NCT05584384

Brief Summary

The trial´s main goal is to explore the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment option for persons suffering from orofacial pain. The aim of the trial is to further investigate the efficacy and longevity of tDCS in treating chronic pharmacoresistant orofacial pain. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, two-arm, sham-controlled design will be utilized. Primarily, the analgesic effect's intensity and duration will be assessed. Secondarily, the associated reduction of symptoms of anxiety and depression will be investigated, as well as the impact on the general quality of life. Anodal stimulation (6 sessions in 2 weeks, 2mA, 20 min, cathode over the opposite Fp area) of M1 contralateral to the pain location will be employed. Washout periods of 48-72 hours will be kept between applications to improve neuroplasticity changes' induction, which is estimated to reflect in the effect retention. Eight major evaluation points will be employed in 26 weeks, and a daily numeric rating scale (NRS) self-assessment. The trial will potentially improve the quality of life, reduce the health burden caused by chronic orofacial pain, and provide further data on the use of tDCS in this setting, thus, enabling an additional route to manage the symptoms of pain in the future.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 3, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 14, 2022

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 18, 2022

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 21, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

October 14, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Orofacial PaintDCStrancranial DIrect Current StimulationNIBSnon-invasive brain stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (26)

  • The McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form).

    The Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire is a standardized questionnaire assessing pain's sensory and affective dimensions. The types of pain are scaled as to their intensity between 1-4 (a higher value denotes higher intensity), the overall intensity is scaled between 0-5 (a higher value denotes higher intensity), and VAS is used to visualize the notion of pain (evaluated on a scale of 0-10, a higher value denotes higher intensity).

    The measurement will be established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)

  • Changes in The McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form) at T2.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in The McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form) at T3.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in The McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form) at T4.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T4 (10 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in The McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form) at T5.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T5 (14 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in The McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form) at T6.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T6 (18 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in The McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form) at T7.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T7 (22 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in The McGill Pain Questionnaire (short form) at T8.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T8 (26 weeks since T1)

  • The numeric rating scale (NRS) as part of "pain diary"

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable.

    The measurement will be established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)

  • Changes in the numeric rating scale (NRS) every day of them follow-up period.

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured every day since T1 up until T8. (for 26 weeks in total)

  • The Margolis Pain Diagram

    The Margolis pain diagram weights the extension and distribution of pain, expressed as the percentage of body surface in pain and its location. The tool consists of a dorsal and a ventral drawing of the body. The subjects are asked to shade areas in which they have experienced pain.

    The measurement will be established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)

  • Changes in the Margolis Pain Diagram at T2.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the Margolis Pain Diagram at T3.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the Margolis Pain Diagram at T4.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T4 (10 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the Margolis Pain Diagram at T5.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T5 (14 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the Margolis Pain Diagram at T6.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T6 (18 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the Margolis Pain Diagram at T7.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T7 (22 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the Margolis Pain Diagram at T8.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T8 (26 weeks since T1)

  • The questionnaire of interference with daily activities

    A standardized questionnaire to evaluate the interference of pain with daily activities. Minimum=0 points, maximum=5 points. A higher score generally means more severe interference.

    The measurement will be established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)

  • Changes in the questionnaire of interference with daily activities at T2.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the questionnaire of interference with daily activities at T3.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the questionnaire of interference with daily activities at T4.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T4 (10 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the questionnaire of interference with daily activities at T5.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T5 (14 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the questionnaire of interference with daily activities at T6.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T6 (18 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the questionnaire of interference with daily activities at T7.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T7 (22 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in the questionnaire of interference with daily activities at T8.

    Changes compared to the baseline (T1) will be calculated and further statistically compared between the groups. A negative difference to the baseline means an improvement

    Measured at T8 (26 weeks since T1)

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI)

    The measurement will be established as a baseline prior to the stimulation series. (at T1)

  • Changes in Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) at T2.

    Measured at T2 (after the 6th stimulation, 2 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) at T3.

    Measured at T3 (6 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) at T4.

    Measured at T4 (10 weeks since T1)

  • Changes in Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) at T5.

    Measured at T5 (14 weeks since T1)

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active group

EXPERIMENTAL

The investigators aim for six sessions of anodal stimulation over the right primary motor area contralateral to the orofacial pain (C3 or C4 in 10-20 EEG system) with cathode above the frontal area ipsilateral to the orofacial pain (Fp1 or Fp2) using HDCstim by Newronika S.r.l., Italy. The therapy will be administered over two weeks (Mon, Wed, Fri) to ensure a washout period of 48 to 72 hours between applications. The current of 2 mA will be delivered via silicone electrodes inserted into saline (0.9%) filled cellulose sponges, anode 5x5cm, cathode 6x8cm, for 20 minutes with 20 seconds of both ramp-up and ramp-down. An International 10-20 EEG system will be used to determine the stimulation location, and dedicated EEG caps will be used to ensure consistency between applications.

Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Sham group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The sham (placebo) will be administered using the same devices with a preprogrammed sham protocol (using HDCprog by Newronika S.r.l., Italy) of 20 minutes to be virtually indistinguishable from the active stimulation.

Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory method utilizing weak electrical currents to elicit short and long-term central nervous system changes.

Also known as: tDCS
Active group

The sham was administered using the same tDCS devices as in the active group with a preprogrammed sham protocol of 20 minutes to be virtually indistinguishable from the active stimulation.

Also known as: Sham tDCS
Sham group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of Orofacial Pain by a pain medicine specialist according to ICOP (International classification of orofacial pain) and ICHD3 (International classification of headache disorder)
  • Stable analgesic therapy one month before the stimulation series

You may not qualify if:

  • Changes to the analgesic therapy in 6 months following the stimulation series
  • Non-compliance with the follow-ups
  • General contraindications to tDCS - pregnancy, unstable cardiovascular disorders, epilepsy and intracranial masses

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pain Management Centre, General University Hospital in Prague; Charles University in Prague

Prague, 12000, Czechia

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Facial Pain

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Study Officials

  • Jitka Fricova, M.D., Ph.D.

    General University Hospital in Prague; Charles University in Prague

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Tadeas Mares, M.D.

    General University Hospital in Prague; Charles University in Prague

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Martin Anders, M.D., Ph.D.

    General University Hospital in Prague; Charles University in Prague

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Jozef Buday, M.D., Ph.D.

    General University Hospital in Prague; Charles University in Prague

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Jitka Fricova, M.D., Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The participants will be distributed between 2 arms using an aperiodic, nondeterministic, atmospheric random noise randomization algorithm. The stimulation type will be unblinded upon completing all the follow-ups or dropping out. The blinding will be ensured by a dedicated team member with no direct access to the participants or their data.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-arm trial.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of tDCS lab

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2022

First Posted

October 18, 2022

Study Start

October 3, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

February 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD is to be shared on request by a verified researcher. The study director´s discretion is reserved.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
When the results are published, indefinitely.
Access Criteria
Verified researchers only.

Locations