Immersive Virtual Reality in Functional Motor Disorders
FMD
Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Program to Reduce Symptoms Severity and Improve Quality of Life in Patients With Functional Motor Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of a 5-day immersive VR-rehabilitation treatment versus a 5-day conventional rehabilitation treatment in reducing FMDs symptoms severity, assessed by the Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S- FMDRS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 29, 2023
CompletedOctober 14, 2022
October 1, 2022
11 months
October 1, 2022
October 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) score
Objective-rated validated scale to rate the duration and severity of functional motor symptoms (range: 0-54; higher = worse).
Before the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T0), after the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T1), and after 12 weeks (T2).
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Change in the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory Scale (MFI-20) score
Before the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T0), after the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T1), and after 12 weeks (T2).
Change in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score
Before the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T0), after the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T1), and after 12 weeks (T2).
Change in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score
Before the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T0) and after 12 weeks (T2).
Change in the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) score
Before the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T0) and after 12 weeks (T2).
Change in the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) score
Before the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T0) and after 12 weeks (T2).
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Number of drop-out
Before the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T0), after the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T1)
number of patients who refuse the treatment
Before the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T0), after the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T1)
number of falls or event near falling
after the intensive 5-day rehabilitation program (T1)
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Virtual Reality Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients will attend the in-person 5-day rehabilitation program (2 h/day) to re-establish normal movement patterns in a dynamic and challenging VR environment. During each session, the patients will be supervised by the physiotherapist. The immersive VR system will simultaneously deliver visual and auditory distractors during the exercises.
Control Group Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will attend the in-person 5-day rehabilitation program (2 h/day) to re-establish normal movement patterns within a multidisciplinary etiological framework according to a validated rehabilitation protocol for FMDs.The conventional group will undergo the same dose, frequency, and intensity of rehabilitation treatment as the VR group consisting of rehabilitation without VR exercises.
Interventions
Virtual reality (VR) is a powerful tool to create an illusory state in which the user can feel that they have been transported to a new location (place illusion), that events happening are real (plausibility illusion), and even that bodies have been substituted by an avatar (embodiment illusion). VR illusions are driven by the same neurological mechanisms of everyday perception of the body in the world and induce realistic responses to VR.
Treatment will follow general treatment principles in physiotherapy for FMDs: (1) education; (2) exploration of how symptoms affect movement and posture; (3) retraining movement using strategies based on redirection of attention; and (4) development of a self-management plan.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona
Verona, 37131, Italy
Related Publications (7)
Nielsen G, Buszewicz M, Stevenson F, Hunter R, Holt K, Dudziec M, Ricciardi L, Marsden J, Joyce E, Edwards MJ. Randomised feasibility study of physiotherapy for patients with functional motor symptoms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;88(6):484-490. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314408. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
PMID: 27694498BACKGROUNDLubetzky AV, Kary EE, Harel D, Hujsak B, Perlin K. Feasibility and reliability of a virtual reality oculus platform to measure sensory integration for postural control in young adults. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Dec;34(12):935-950. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1431344. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
PMID: 29364733BACKGROUNDKim A, Darakjian N, Finley JM. Walking in fully immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of potential adverse effects in older adults and individuals with Parkinson's disease. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Feb 21;14(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0225-2.
PMID: 28222783BACKGROUNDNielsen G, Stone J, Matthews A, Brown M, Sparkes C, Farmer R, Masterton L, Duncan L, Winters A, Daniell L, Lumsden C, Carson A, David AS, Edwards M. Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: a consensus recommendation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;86(10):1113-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309255. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
PMID: 25433033BACKGROUNDPerez DL, Edwards MJ, Nielsen G, Kozlowska K, Hallett M, LaFrance WC Jr. Decade of progress in motor functional neurological disorder: continuing the momentum. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 15:jnnp-2020-323953. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323953. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33722822BACKGROUNDGandolfi M, Sandri A, Geroin C, Bombieri F, Riello M, Menaspa Z, Bonetto C, Smania N, Tinazzi M. Improvement in motor symptoms, physical fatigue, and self-rated change perception in functional motor disorders: a prospective cohort study of a 12-week telemedicine program. J Neurol. 2022 Nov;269(11):5940-5953. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11230-8. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
PMID: 35809125RESULTGandolfi M, Riello M, Bellamoli V, Bombieri F, Geroin C, Di Vico IA, Tinazzi M. Motor and non-motor outcomes after a rehabilitation program for patients with Functional Motor Disorders: A prospective, observational cohort study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;48(3):305-314. doi: 10.3233/NRE-201617.
PMID: 33780378RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marialuisa Gandolfi, PhD
Università di Verona
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- An examiner blinded to group allocation will assess all patients. To keep blindness, the examiner will not ask for information about the treatment to the patients or the caregivers, and this last will be instructed not to give any extra information outside of the examiner's questions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2022
First Posted
October 14, 2022
Study Start
September 29, 2022
Primary Completion
August 30, 2023
Study Completion
September 29, 2023
Last Updated
October 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10