Digital Epidemiology Study on Brain Functioning
EPIDIA4Kids
2 other identifiers
interventional
736
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Neurobiology has improved the integrative understanding of brain development. With digital technologies, digital (bio)markers would be relevant variables for a better understanding of the heterogeneity of cognitive and behavioral functioning in developing children. However, the dominant statistical approach of group comparison tends to ignore intragroup variability. Applying high-dimensional data sets through multivariate methods and then combining their scores via predictive model learning algorithms would allow the identification of subtypes. Thus, EPIDIA4KIDS wants to understand the brain functioning of children aged 7 to 12 years old from heterogeneous data sources collected from a touchscreen tablet.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedOctober 19, 2023
April 1, 2023
1.3 years
September 16, 2022
October 18, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (39)
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Measure number of criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet Total errors, Number of errors in total, False responses
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Measure number of criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet False responses
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Measure number of criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet Number of responses other than omission
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Measure number of criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet Hits/Accuracy, Number of correct responses, Hits of correct responses
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Measure number of criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet Standard deviation of the 3 standard errors calculated for each task block
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Measure number of criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet Order of combination of responses
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Time criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of typically developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet Hits of Reaction time (RT), Median of reaction times for correct responses, Hits RT SE Standard error of Hits RT, Hits RT block change
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Time criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of typically developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet Slope of change in RT between blocks, Slope of change in RT standard errors between blocks
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Time criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of typically developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet SE variability Standard deviation of the 3 standard errors calculated for each task block
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Time criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of typically developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet Order of combination of responses by reaction time
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Eye-movement criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet \- Eye-tracking associated with O-Kidia battery: Number of saccade (pro/anti-), Number of blinks
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Eye-movement for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet \- Eye-tracking associated with O-Kidia battery: near-point convergence, Near-point contact point
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Eye-movement criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet \- Eye-tracking associated with O-Kidia battery: amplitude, direction, direction interval,
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Time of eye-movement criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet \- Eye-tracking associated with O-Kidia battery: reaction time, fixation, time interval
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Digit-movement criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet \- Digit-tracking associated with O-Kidia battery : direction, cumulated distance, distance to the proper trajectory
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Time of digit-movement criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet \- Digit-tracking associated with O-Kidia battery : exploration time, time to the proper trajectory
24 months
Create a Normative Database for emotional, behavioral and cognitive performance
Velocity of digit-movement criteria for motor skills, emotions, cognition and behavior, and therefore a neurodevelopmental presentation of developing children when playing with the O-Kidia battery on a touchscreen tablet
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : WISC-V subtests, including Verbal concept, Fluid Reasoning scale, Working Memory measures, Processing Speed abilities \- Accuracy measures are :Total errors, Number of errors in total
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : WISC-V subtests, including Verbal concept, Fluid Reasoning scale, Working Memory measures, Processing Speed abilities \- False responses, Number of responses other than omission
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : WISC-V subtests, including Verbal concept, Fluid Reasoning scale, Working Memory measures, Processing Speed abilities \- Number of correct responses, Hits of correct responses
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : WISC-V subtests, including Verbal concept, Fluid Reasoning scale, Working Memory measures, Processing Speed abilities \- SE variability Standard deviation of the 3 standard errors calculated for each task block
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : WISC-V subtests, including Verbal concept, Fluid Reasoning scale, Working Memory measures, Processing Speed abilities \- Order of combination of responses
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : WISC-V subtests, including Verbal concept, Fluid Reasoning scale, Working Memory measures, Processing Speed abilities \- Reaction time (RT) median for correct responses, Hits RT SE Standard error of Hits RT, Hits RT block change
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : WISC-V subtests, including Verbal concept, Fluid Reasoning scale, Working Memory measures, Processing Speed abilities \- Slope of change in RT between blocks, Slope of change in RT standard errors between blocks
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : WISC-V subtests, including Verbal concept, Fluid Reasoning scale, Working Memory measures, Processing Speed abilities \- SE variability Standard deviation of the 3 standard errors calculated for each task block, Order of combination of responses by reaction time
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Event planification abilities, the Tower of London Determination of performance at the test of the Tower of London coupled with eye-tracking. * Tower of London: analysed variables are: Number of problems solved (maximum duration is one minute) Failure if three successive problems are unsolved Types of error : systematic rule violation, back-and-forth Percentage of problems solved with the execution (minimal) number of moves. * Hits/Accuracy Number of correct responses The higher score is the better outcome.
18 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Event planification abilities, the Tower of London Time for the performance at the test of the Tower of London coupled with eye-tracking. * Duration for planification and execution * Reaction Time, Total errors * Hits RT Median of reaction times for correct responses, Hits RT SE Standard error of Hits RT
18 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Children Behavior Check List (short version, 32 items) 32 items rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "never" (0) to "very often" (3) for the anxiety scale. The higher score is the worse outcome.
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Children Behavior Check List (short version, 32 items) 32 items rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "never" (0) to "very often" (3) for the evitant/depression scale. The higher score is the worse outcome.
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Children Behavior Check List (short version, 32 items) 32 items rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "never" (0) to "very often" (3) for the social problem scale. The higher score is the worse outcome.
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Behavioral assessment of executive function scoring (BRIEF, 72 items) 72 items rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "never" (1) to "often" (3).The clinical scale gives a well-rounded picture of the behavior of the child or adolescent being rated.
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : (Keith Conners-3, 108 items) -108-items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "never" (0) to "often" (3) to give insight into ADHD assessment as well as comorbid disorders such as Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder. The higher score is the worse outcome
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Autism Quotient List version scoring (10 items) -10-items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "Strongly agree" (1) to "definitely disagree" (3). Only one point can be awarded for each question. Give 1 point for "Strongly agree" or "Definitely disagree " for questions 1, 5, 7, and 10. Award 1 point for "Strongly Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" for each of questions 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9. If the person scores 6 or higher, he or she probably has social difficulties requiring referral for a specialized diagnostic assessment.
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : QTAC scoring, coordination acquisition disorder (15 items) 15-items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "not alike" (1) to "extremyly alike disagree" (5). The higher the scores the higher coordination acquisition disorder is suspected.
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity components with the ADHD-Rating Scale (18 items) \- Measure of number of criteria for inattention, hyperactivity-impulsivity and therefore clinical presentation of ADHD (Predominant Inattentive, Predominant Hyperactive-Impulsive, Combined )
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity components with the ADHD-Rating Scale (18 items) \- ADHD Rating Scale: 9 inattention items and 9 hyperactivity-impulsivity items rated on a 0-3 scale (range 0-27), therefore the total score is on a 0-54 range. The higher the scores the higher the inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Perseverance \- the Grit-Scale for Children (GSCA, 12 items), items rated on a 1-5 scale, therefore the total score is on a 0-60 range, then divided by 12. The maximum score on this scale is 5 (extremely gritty), and the lowest scale on this scale is 1 (not at all gritty).
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Motivation \- the School Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ, 10 min), 30 items on a Five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "never" (1) to "very often" (5). The SMQ maximum total score is 150 and the minimum is 30 with solid loading scores: Self-Determination (SD), Self-Efficacy (SE), Intrinsic Motivation (IM), and Grade Motivation (GM)
24 months
Convergence validity for the O-Kidia battery
Describe the subgroup and compare it to pattern of comorbidities : Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, 11 items) \- The PSQI consists of 11 self-report questions that combine to give 7 "components" of the overall score, with each component receiving a score from 0 to 3. In all cases, a score of 0 indicates no difficulty while a score of 3 indicates severe difficulty. The 7 components of the score are added together to give an overall score ranging from 0 to 21 points, with 0 indicating no difficulty and 21 indicating major difficulty. A global score is the addition of these 7 components.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Description of participants' characteristics
24 months
Description of participants' characteristics
24 months
Description of participants' characteristics
24 months
Description of participants' characteristics
24 months
Description of participants' characteristics
24 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
O-Kidia battery
OTHERA one-time visit will be performed in children aged 7 to 12 years old as follow : Children will be playing on a series of games with a touch screen tablet while video, EEGs and digit trajectories data will be collected from this mobile device 1. Video recording of the participants during the tablet testing via the intrinsic camera - 30 min 2. Assessments - Paper and tablet psychometric tests will be used during the administrations, 1h45 3. Child health questionnaires - Questionnaires will be completed by children and parents during the visit, 20 min for each
Interventions
Children will be playing on a series of games with a touch screen tablet while video and digit trajectories data will be collected from this mobile device to analyze eye-, face-, sound-recognition.
Electrical recordings and measurements - A mobile EEG headset will be used during the visit - 30 min
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Boys or girls
- Aged 7 to 12 years
- Fluent in the French language
- Agreement and signature of informed consent by the child
- Agreement and signature of informed consent by one of the legal representatives
- Estimated intelligence quotient \> 85
You may not qualify if:
- No biological parent or legal guardian is able to give permission for the minor and agrees to participate in parental assessments
- Prematurity or other perinatal complications that required significant intervention
- History of neurological disorders, including seizure disorders, cerebral palsy, or other conditions requiring neurological or medical care :
- History of head injury:
- Head trauma more than one year old with loss of consciousness \>30 minutes, OR
- Had to be hospitalized for head trauma, OR
- Amnesia \> 24 hours, OR
- Confusion or loss of orientation \>24 hours, OR
- A brain scan revealed problems following a head injury, OR
- Head trauma within the past year with loss of consciousness \>10 minutes. Current or persistent major Axis I psychiatric disorder that may interfere with successful completion of the protocol (e.g., psychosis and bipolar disorder), or substance use disorder.
- Current use of medications with significant effects on brain function or blood flow (e.g., antipsychotics, mood stabilizers); Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) medications and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are not excluded as the use of these medications is associated with certain neurodevelopmental disorders and assessment of these individuals will provide useful data to the community Not fluent in French (all youth materials are in French) Uncorrectable visual, hearing, or sensorimotor impairment, as the protocol items may not be valid.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- O-Kidialead
Study Sites (2)
Association la Busserine
Marseille, Provence Alpes Cotes d'Azur, 13014, France
O-Kidia
Gardanne, Provence-Alpes-CĂ´te d'Azur Region, 13120, France
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vanessa Douet Vannucci, PhD
O-Kidia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2022
First Posted
October 13, 2022
Study Start
March 21, 2023
Primary Completion
July 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04