Is Gait Analysis for Proposed Rotational Deformities a Useful Resource
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rotational deformities, such as femoral (thigh bone) and tibial (leg bone) torsion, are established causes of patellofemoral (kneecap joint) pain and instability. Currently, computerized tomography (CT) remains the gold standard assessment tool for measuring the degree of rotational deformity. However, there is disagreement as to the thresholds for surgical correction as it is suggested that some individuals compensate for the deformity better than others. Gait (walking) analysis provides important information of the biomechanical parameters undertaken in the knee joint during dynamic movement. In patients with rotational deformities, several variations from normal gait patterns have previously been described by several authors. Therefore, it is questioned whether these parameters can be correlated with the static features of CT scans, in individuals with rotational deformities. This study aims to determine whether gait analysis is a useful tool in the diagnosis and treatment pathway for rotational abnormalities in patellofemoral pain or instability. A secondary aim of this study will be to assess whether gait analysis can detect a rotational deformity in the lower limb and determine whether the changes seen are proportionate to the level of deformity. Patients to be included in this retrospective study are, adult patients, with presumed rotational deformity of the lower limb, with anterior knee pain, who have been referred to the gait laboratory for assessment, and for CT rotational profiles. Only patients who have given consent to the gait laboratory for their information to be utilised in research will be included. Two researchers will record measures of rotational deformity from the CT images. The gait laboratory assessment includes measurements of biomechanical parameters based on joint movement through the gait cycle - these parameters will be assessed and compared with CT measures for correlation. All research will be conducted at the hospital where the gait laboratory assessment has been performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2025
CompletedJune 4, 2025
May 1, 2025
Same day
October 7, 2022
May 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Is gait analysis a useful tool to determine rotational deformity?
The study aims to determine gait analysis is a useful tool in the diagnosis and treatment pathway for rotational abnormalities in patellofemoral pain or instability.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Can gait analysis predict the same rotational deformity as CT
3 months
Interventions
Analysis of gait profile and measures by gait laboratory on patients with suspected lower limb rotational deformities and anterior knee pain
Eligibility Criteria
Study population will include patients over 16 years of age who have previously had assessment of their gait and who have been diagnosed with suspected rotational deformity and patellofemoral pain/anterior knee pain. All genders will be accepted.
You may qualify if:
- All patients who have previously undergone gait analysis for assessment of patellofemoral pain and or instability
- Have a rotational CT scan available for assessment of femoral and tibial torsion
- Signed research consent form
You may not qualify if:
- No available CT scan available
- No gait analysis data available
- No signed gait research consent form
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital
Oswestry, United Kingdom
Related Publications (8)
Arazpour M, Bahramian F, Abutorabi A, Nourbakhsh ST, Alidousti A, Aslani H. The Effect of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome on Gait Parameters: A Literature Review. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016 Oct;4(4):298-306.
PMID: 27847840BACKGROUNDLankhorst NE, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Middelkoop M. Factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;47(4):193-206. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090369. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
PMID: 22815424BACKGROUNDRothermich MA, Glaviano NR, Li J, Hart JM. Patellofemoral pain: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options. Clin Sports Med. 2015 Apr;34(2):313-27. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
PMID: 25818716BACKGROUNDSaevarsson SK, Romeo CI, Anglin C. Are static and dynamic kinematics comparable after total knee arthroplasty? J Biomech. 2013 Apr 5;46(6):1169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
PMID: 23394715BACKGROUNDSmith BE, Selfe J, Thacker D, Hendrick P, Bateman M, Moffatt F, Rathleff MS, Smith TO, Logan P. Incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190892. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29324820BACKGROUNDSnow M. Tibial Torsion and Patellofemoral Pain and Instability in the Adult Population: Current Concept Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Feb;14(1):67-75. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09688-y. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
PMID: 33420589BACKGROUNDTan SS, van Linschoten RL, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koopmanschap MA. Cost-utility of exercise therapy in adolescents and young adults suffering from the patellofemoral pain syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Aug;20(4):568-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00980.x. Epub 2009 Aug 23.
PMID: 19706002BACKGROUNDWitvrouw E, Callaghan MJ, Stefanik JJ, Noehren B, Bazett-Jones DM, Willson JD, Earl-Boehm JE, Davis IS, Powers CM, McConnell J, Crossley KM. Patellofemoral pain: consensus statement from the 3rd International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat held in Vancouver, September 2013. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;48(6):411-4. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093450. No abstract available.
PMID: 24569145BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martyn Snow
The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2022
First Posted
October 12, 2022
Study Start
April 21, 2023
Primary Completion
April 21, 2023
Study Completion
April 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05