ISNT Rule in Normal Population
Is the ISNT Rule Still a Rule : a Study to Determine Prevalence of the ISNT Rule and Its Variants in the Normal Population
1 other identifier
observational
116
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study sought to determine the percentage of normal eyes that followed the ISNT rule by retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and neuroretinal rim thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography (OCT) , and secondarily, whether alternative rules may be more applicable or easily generalized.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2022
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2023
CompletedOctober 12, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.1 years
October 9, 2021
October 8, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ISNT rule prevalence in normal population
the percentage of normal eyes that followed the ISNT rule by retinal nerve fiber layer and neuroretinal rim thickness measurements using (OCT)
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
variants of ISNT rule
Baseline
Interventions
measuring retinal nerve fiber layer and neuroretinal rim thickness
Eligibility Criteria
Normal population
You may qualify if:
- a normal eye examination without ocular diseases except for cataracts
- best corrected vision of \> 6/12
- a normal VF test result defined by a pattern standard deviation value of \> 5% compared to age matched controls in the perimeter's normative database and a glaucoma hemifield test within normal limits
- a spherical equivalent of between -5 and +5 diopters.
You may not qualify if:
- unreliable VF testing with \> 33% fixation losses, \> 20% false positives, or \> 20% false negatives.
- any history of ocular hypertension or intraocular pressures \> 21mmHg at the time of the visit;
- inter-eye cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) asymmetry of \> 0.2;CDR of \> 0.4
- history of a neurologic disease or systemic medication that could produce VF defects.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (18)
Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;86(2):238-42. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.2.238.
PMID: 11815354BACKGROUNDQuigley HA. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1367-77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61423-7. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
PMID: 21453963BACKGROUNDBourne RR, Taylor HR, Flaxman SR, Keeffe J, Leasher J, Naidoo K, Pesudovs K, White RA, Wong TY, Resnikoff S, Jonas JB; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Number of People Blind or Visually Impaired by Glaucoma Worldwide and in World Regions 1990 - 2010: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 20;11(10):e0162229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162229. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27764086BACKGROUNDTham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
PMID: 24974815BACKGROUNDKeltner JL, Johnson CA, Anderson DR, Levine RA, Fan J, Cello KE, Quigley HA, Budenz DL, Parrish RK, Kass MA, Gordon MO; Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.061.
PMID: 16949445BACKGROUNDBroadway DC, Nicolela MT, Drance SM. Optic disk appearances in primary open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;43 Suppl 1:S223-43. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00007-7.
PMID: 10416767BACKGROUNDJonas JB, Budde WM. Diagnosis and pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy: morphological aspects. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000 Jan;19(1):1-40. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(99)00002-6.
PMID: 10614679BACKGROUNDJonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 Jul;29(7):1151-8.
PMID: 3417404BACKGROUNDJonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan-Feb;43(4):293-320. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(98)00049-6.
PMID: 10025513BACKGROUNDVarma R, Skaf M, Barron E. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology. 1996 Dec;103(12):2114-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30381-3.
PMID: 9003346BACKGROUNDDichtl A, Jonas JB, Naumann GO. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in human eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;237(6):474-9. doi: 10.1007/s004170050264.
PMID: 10379607BACKGROUNDJonas JB, Budde WM, Lang P. Neuroretinal rim width ratios in morphological glaucoma diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Dec;82(12):1366-71. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.12.1366.
PMID: 9930265BACKGROUNDHarizman N, Oliveira C, Chiang A, Tello C, Marmor M, Ritch R, Liebmann JM. The ISNT rule and differentiation of normal from glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;124(11):1579-83. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.11.1579.
PMID: 17102005BACKGROUNDLaw SK, Kornmann HL, Nilforushan N, Moghimi S, Caprioli J. Evaluation of the "IS" Rule to Differentiate Glaucomatous Eyes From Normal. J Glaucoma. 2016 Jan;25(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000072.
PMID: 24844540BACKGROUNDMorgan JE, Bourtsoukli I, Rajkumar KN, Ansari E, Cunliffe IA, North RV, Wild JM. The accuracy of the inferior>superior>nasal>temporal neuroretinal rim area rule for diagnosing glaucomatous optic disc damage. Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):723-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.004. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
PMID: 22365059BACKGROUNDDave P, Shah J. Applicability of ISNT and IST rules to the retinal nerve fibre layer using spectral domain optical coherence tomography in early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;99(12):1713-7. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306331. Epub 2015 May 28.
PMID: 26021327BACKGROUNDPradhan ZS, Braganza A, Abraham LM. Does the ISNT Rule Apply to the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer? J Glaucoma. 2016 Jan;25(1):e1-4. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000064.
PMID: 24777047BACKGROUNDSihota R, Srinivasan G, Dada T, Gupta V, Ghate D, Sharma A. Is the ISNT rule violated in early primary open-angle glaucoma--a scanning laser tomography study. Eye (Lond). 2008 Jun;22(6):819-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702798. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
PMID: 17435693BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Abd-Elnasser A Mohamed, PhD
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident ophthalmologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2021
First Posted
October 12, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 30, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2023
Last Updated
October 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10