Effect of High-fat/High-sugar Diet on Food Reward Signaling
Influence of High Fat Feeding on Brain and Behaviour in Individuals at Genetic Risk of Obesity
1 other identifier
interventional
82
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In this randomized, single-blinded basic research study, healthy normal-weight human participants are exposed to a high-fat/high-sugar (HF/HS) snack or a low-fat/low-sugar (LF/LS) snack twice a day for eight weeks in addition to their regular diet. All participants are tested at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of dietary intervention. At all time points the investigators acquire the following parameters:
- Body weight and composition,
- Blood parameters to control for metabolic changes,
- Visual analog scales (hunger, satiety, tiredness, etc.),
- Fat and sugar concentration preference,
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during a learning and a gustatory perception task. The investigators hypothesize that the habitual consumption of a small HF/HS snack will reduce the preference for low-fat concentrations and will have an impact on brain response to the anticipation and consumption of palatable food. Moreover, the investigators hypothesize, that HF/HS diet will have an impact neuronal encoding of learning independent of food cues. The investigators expect these alterations independent of body weight gain suggesting a direct effect of HF/HS diet on neuronal circuits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2022
CompletedOctober 10, 2022
October 1, 2022
2.6 years
October 5, 2022
October 7, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in fat taste preference after 8-weeks dietary intervention
In the fat and sugar concentration preference task, the preference and perception are evaluated using a series of puddings with varying fat content (0%, 3.1%, 6.9%, and 15.6 %), and sugar concentration using apple juice with varying sucrose content (0 M, 0.1 M, 0.56 M, and 1 M). Each pudding and juice concentration is tested 12 times and the average is calculated. "Wanting" and "Liking" are assessed for all concentrations and the change between baseline and the post-intervention is assessed in both HF/HS and LF/LS groups.
Preference (wanting and liking) for different fat and sugar concentrations was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
Change brain response to milkshake anticipation and milkshake consumption after 8-weeks dietary intervention
To test the effect of the dietary intervention on brain responses to milkshake anticipation (milkshake predicting cue) and consumption (milkshake delivery), the investigators performed a gustatory perception task. The BOLD response while milkshake cue presentation and milkshake delivery was compared between baseline and postintervention and compared between groups.
BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) response to milkshake anticipation and consumption was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
Change in neuronal encoding of prediction error processing after 8-weeks dietary intervention.
A short version of the sensory learning task as described in detail by Iglesias et al. (2019) was performed to assess associative learning independent of food rewards, while undergoing fMRI. Within this model, the investigators computed the (signed) adaptive precision error relating to the precision-weighted choice prediction error about visual outcome, that is, the product of choice prediction error (a) and the adaptive learning rate (b). The investigators tested the BOLD response related to choice prediction error and compared it between baseline and post-intervention and between the HF/HS and LF/LS group.
BOLD response related to choice prediction error was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. (http://www.vislab.ucl.ac.uk/Cogent/index.html).For further analysis, the investigators calculated the average rating across the total 12.
Study Arms (2)
High-Fat/High-Sugar (HF/HS) Diet
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to consume an HF/HS yoghurt (40.8 % kcal from fat, 45.6 % kcal from carbohydrates, 13 % kcal from protein of 79.5 total kcal) two times a day for eight weeks in addition to their normal diet.
Low-Fat/Low-Sugar (LF/LS) Diet
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to consume an LF/LS yoghurt (17.1 % kcal from fat, 29.1 % kcal from carbohydrates, 51.9 % kcal from protein of 78 total kcal) two times a day for eight weeks in addition to their normal diet.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- right handed
- non-smoker (for the last 1 year not smoked more than 2 cigarettes per month)
- Body Mass Index between 20-27 kg/m2 (healthy weight)
You may not qualify if:
- serious or unstable medical illness (e.g., cancer);
- past or current history of alcoholism or consistent drug use;
- current and history of major psychiatric illness as defined by the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) criteria including eating disorders,
- medications that affect alertness (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines, chloral hydrate, haloperidol, lithium, carbamazepine, phenytoin, etc.) and any psychoactive drugs or anti-obesity agents;
- history of major head trauma with loss of consciousness;
- ongoing pregnancy;
- known taste or smell dysfunction;
- a diagnosis of diabetes;
- any known food allergy, certain food sensitivities (lactose);
- pregnant or nursing women,
- history of metalworking, injury with shrapnel or metal slivers, and major surgery;
- history of pacemaker or neurostimulator implantation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Researchlead
- Yale Universitycollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jens C Bruening, MD
Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dana M Small, PhD
Yale University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Tittgemeyer, PhD
Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2022
First Posted
October 10, 2022
Study Start
March 9, 2016
Primary Completion
October 24, 2018
Study Completion
October 24, 2018
Last Updated
October 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10