NCT05574660

Brief Summary

In this randomized, single-blinded basic research study, healthy normal-weight human participants are exposed to a high-fat/high-sugar (HF/HS) snack or a low-fat/low-sugar (LF/LS) snack twice a day for eight weeks in addition to their regular diet. All participants are tested at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of dietary intervention. At all time points the investigators acquire the following parameters:

  • Body weight and composition,
  • Blood parameters to control for metabolic changes,
  • Visual analog scales (hunger, satiety, tiredness, etc.),
  • Fat and sugar concentration preference,
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during a learning and a gustatory perception task. The investigators hypothesize that the habitual consumption of a small HF/HS snack will reduce the preference for low-fat concentrations and will have an impact on brain response to the anticipation and consumption of palatable food. Moreover, the investigators hypothesize, that HF/HS diet will have an impact neuronal encoding of learning independent of food cues. The investigators expect these alterations independent of body weight gain suggesting a direct effect of HF/HS diet on neuronal circuits.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 9, 2016

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 24, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 24, 2018

Completed
4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 5, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 10, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 10, 2022

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

October 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 7, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in fat taste preference after 8-weeks dietary intervention

    In the fat and sugar concentration preference task, the preference and perception are evaluated using a series of puddings with varying fat content (0%, 3.1%, 6.9%, and 15.6 %), and sugar concentration using apple juice with varying sucrose content (0 M, 0.1 M, 0.56 M, and 1 M). Each pudding and juice concentration is tested 12 times and the average is calculated. "Wanting" and "Liking" are assessed for all concentrations and the change between baseline and the post-intervention is assessed in both HF/HS and LF/LS groups.

    Preference (wanting and liking) for different fat and sugar concentrations was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.

  • Change brain response to milkshake anticipation and milkshake consumption after 8-weeks dietary intervention

    To test the effect of the dietary intervention on brain responses to milkshake anticipation (milkshake predicting cue) and consumption (milkshake delivery), the investigators performed a gustatory perception task. The BOLD response while milkshake cue presentation and milkshake delivery was compared between baseline and postintervention and compared between groups.

    BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) response to milkshake anticipation and consumption was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.

  • Change in neuronal encoding of prediction error processing after 8-weeks dietary intervention.

    A short version of the sensory learning task as described in detail by Iglesias et al. (2019) was performed to assess associative learning independent of food rewards, while undergoing fMRI. Within this model, the investigators computed the (signed) adaptive precision error relating to the precision-weighted choice prediction error about visual outcome, that is, the product of choice prediction error (a) and the adaptive learning rate (b). The investigators tested the BOLD response related to choice prediction error and compared it between baseline and post-intervention and between the HF/HS and LF/LS group.

    BOLD response related to choice prediction error was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. (http://www.vislab.ucl.ac.uk/Cogent/index.html).For further analysis, the investigators calculated the average rating across the total 12.

Study Arms (2)

High-Fat/High-Sugar (HF/HS) Diet

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized to consume an HF/HS yoghurt (40.8 % kcal from fat, 45.6 % kcal from carbohydrates, 13 % kcal from protein of 79.5 total kcal) two times a day for eight weeks in addition to their normal diet.

Dietary Supplement: High-Fat/High-Sugar (HF/HS) Diet

Low-Fat/Low-Sugar (LF/LS) Diet

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized to consume an LF/LS yoghurt (17.1 % kcal from fat, 29.1 % kcal from carbohydrates, 51.9 % kcal from protein of 78 total kcal) two times a day for eight weeks in addition to their normal diet.

Dietary Supplement: Low-Fat/Low-Sugar (LF/LS) Diet

Interventions

High-Fat/High-Sugar (HF/HS) Diet
Low-Fat/Low-Sugar (LF/LS) Diet

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • right handed
  • non-smoker (for the last 1 year not smoked more than 2 cigarettes per month)
  • Body Mass Index between 20-27 kg/m2 (healthy weight)

You may not qualify if:

  • serious or unstable medical illness (e.g., cancer);
  • past or current history of alcoholism or consistent drug use;
  • current and history of major psychiatric illness as defined by the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) criteria including eating disorders,
  • medications that affect alertness (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines, chloral hydrate, haloperidol, lithium, carbamazepine, phenytoin, etc.) and any psychoactive drugs or anti-obesity agents;
  • history of major head trauma with loss of consciousness;
  • ongoing pregnancy;
  • known taste or smell dysfunction;
  • a diagnosis of diabetes;
  • any known food allergy, certain food sensitivities (lactose);
  • pregnant or nursing women,
  • history of metalworking, injury with shrapnel or metal slivers, and major surgery;
  • history of pacemaker or neurostimulator implantation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Feeding Behavior

Interventions

Diet

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior, AnimalBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Jens C Bruening, MD

    Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Dana M Small, PhD

    Yale University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Marc Tittgemeyer, PhD

    Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2022

First Posted

October 10, 2022

Study Start

March 9, 2016

Primary Completion

October 24, 2018

Study Completion

October 24, 2018

Last Updated

October 10, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10