Piperacillin-tazobactam and Temocillin as Carbapenem-alternatives for the Treatment of Severe Infections Due to Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-Producing Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae in the Intensive Care Unit
PITAGORE
1 other identifier
interventional
600
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are a major public health concern, in particular in the intensive care unit (ICU), due to the increase in their incidence. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice of these infections, but their increased use may select for carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacilli, which currently represents the greatest threat in terms of antibiotic resistance. Several retrospective studies have shown that the use of non-carbapenem antibiotics (mainly the association of piperacillin/tazobactam, but also cefepime and temocillin) may be safe alternatives to carbapenems to treat these pathogens when the strain is susceptible to the corresponding antibiotic. However, one recent randomized controlled study, the Merino trial, failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of piperacillin/tazobactam, as compared to meropenem, in patients with Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia resistant to third generation cephalosporins (mainly ESBL producers). However, the patients included in that study were not ICU patients, dosing and modalities of piperacillin/tazobactam administration were not optimal (30-min infusion whereas 4-hours infusion may be associated with better outcome), and cause of death of patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam arm were not due to antimicrobial treatment failure (mostly death due to care withdrawal in cancer patients). Recently, a retrospective bicenter study performed in ICU patients showed that outcome of patients with severe infection (i.e. sepsis and septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 definition) due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to non-carbapenem agents treated with a non-carbapenem agent was similar to that of patients treated with carbapenems. Given the scarcity of data in ICU patients, the disputable results of the Merino trial, we will therefore conduct a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of non-carbapenem beta-lactam (piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin) treatment vs. meropenem treatment for ESBL-producing Enterobaceriaceae severe infection in ICU patients. Our hypothesis is that a non-carbapenem beta-lactam treatment is non-inferior to carbapenem treatment in patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae severe infection in the ICU.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 sepsis
Started Mar 2023
Typical duration for phase_3 sepsis
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedApril 18, 2023
April 1, 2023
3.1 years
September 26, 2022
April 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality
Day 30
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Mortality
Day 90
Relapses rates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase infection
Day 30
Clinical failure rate
Day 30
Rate of antibiotic allergy
Day 30
Incidence of adverse drug reactions
Between randomization and Day 90
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin
EXPERIMENTALPiperacillin/tazobactam, 4.5 g by intravenous route every 6 hours (adjusted in case of renal failure). Piperacillin/tazobactam will be infused over 4 hours. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection Temocillin, 6g/24 hours infused continuously by intravenous route after 2 g loading dose (adjusted in case of renal failure). Temocillin will be infused continuously. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection
Meropenem
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2 g every 8 hours by intravenous route (adjusted in case of renal failure). Meropenem will be infused over 2 hours. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection
Interventions
Piperacillin/tazobactam : 4.5 g by intravenous route every 6 hours (adjusted in case of renal failure). Temocillin : 6g/24 hours infused continuously by intravenous route after 2 g loading dose (adjusted in case of renal failure)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients ≥ 18-year-old
- Hospitalized in the ICU
- Severe infection, eg sepsis or septic shock (according to the Sepsis-3 definition) Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, characterized by an increase of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 points or more. This increase in 2 points will be calculated the day infection is diagnosed (day of positive culture serving as reference for the infection) as compared to the day before infection onset.
- Septic shock is defined as sepsis and persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg and having a serum lactate level \>2 mmol/l despite adequate volume resuscitation.
- This criterion (sepsis or septic shock) has to be fulfilled within a time frame of +/- 24 hours from the day of infection diagnosis (i.e. the day of positive bacteriological sample).
- Pathogen responsible for infection is an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to meropenem and either to piperacillin/tazobactam (minimum inhibitory concentration \<8 mg/L) or to temocillin (minimum inhibitory concentration ≤8 mg/L)
You may not qualify if:
- Affiliation to social security (AME excluded)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Known allergy to beta-lactam
- Patient with severe neutropenia, as defined by absolute neutrophil count \<0.5x109/L
- Infection requiring prolonged antimicrobial treatment (endocarditis; mediastinitis; osteomyelitis/septic arthritis; undrainable/undrained abscess; unremovable/unremoved prosthetic-associated infection)
- Decision of withholding/withdrawing care
- Patient with concomitant infection requiring antibiotics with activity against Gram-negative bacilli, including patient with polymicrobial infection with pathogen resistant to study drugs
- Hypersensitivity to any components of the formulations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
LUYT Charles -Edouard
Paris, 75013, France
MAYAUX Julien
Paris, 75013, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2022
First Posted
October 4, 2022
Study Start
March 11, 2023
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04