NCT05565222

Brief Summary

Infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are a major public health concern, in particular in the intensive care unit (ICU), due to the increase in their incidence. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice of these infections, but their increased use may select for carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacilli, which currently represents the greatest threat in terms of antibiotic resistance. Several retrospective studies have shown that the use of non-carbapenem antibiotics (mainly the association of piperacillin/tazobactam, but also cefepime and temocillin) may be safe alternatives to carbapenems to treat these pathogens when the strain is susceptible to the corresponding antibiotic. However, one recent randomized controlled study, the Merino trial, failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of piperacillin/tazobactam, as compared to meropenem, in patients with Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia resistant to third generation cephalosporins (mainly ESBL producers). However, the patients included in that study were not ICU patients, dosing and modalities of piperacillin/tazobactam administration were not optimal (30-min infusion whereas 4-hours infusion may be associated with better outcome), and cause of death of patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam arm were not due to antimicrobial treatment failure (mostly death due to care withdrawal in cancer patients). Recently, a retrospective bicenter study performed in ICU patients showed that outcome of patients with severe infection (i.e. sepsis and septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 definition) due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to non-carbapenem agents treated with a non-carbapenem agent was similar to that of patients treated with carbapenems. Given the scarcity of data in ICU patients, the disputable results of the Merino trial, we will therefore conduct a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of non-carbapenem beta-lactam (piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin) treatment vs. meropenem treatment for ESBL-producing Enterobaceriaceae severe infection in ICU patients. Our hypothesis is that a non-carbapenem beta-lactam treatment is non-inferior to carbapenem treatment in patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae severe infection in the ICU.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
600

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 sepsis

Timeline
0mo left

Started Mar 2023

Typical duration for phase_3 sepsis

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress99%
Mar 2023Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 11, 2023

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

April 18, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

September 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

carbapenem-alternativessevere infections

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mortality

    Day 30

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Mortality

    Day 90

  • Relapses rates of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase infection

    Day 30

  • Clinical failure rate

    Day 30

  • Rate of antibiotic allergy

    Day 30

  • Incidence of adverse drug reactions

    Between randomization and Day 90

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin

EXPERIMENTAL

Piperacillin/tazobactam, 4.5 g by intravenous route every 6 hours (adjusted in case of renal failure). Piperacillin/tazobactam will be infused over 4 hours. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection Temocillin, 6g/24 hours infused continuously by intravenous route after 2 g loading dose (adjusted in case of renal failure). Temocillin will be infused continuously. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection

Drug: Piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin

Meropenem

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

2 g every 8 hours by intravenous route (adjusted in case of renal failure). Meropenem will be infused over 2 hours. Duration of treatment will be adjusted according to the site of infection

Drug: Meropenem

Interventions

Piperacillin/tazobactam : 4.5 g by intravenous route every 6 hours (adjusted in case of renal failure). Temocillin : 6g/24 hours infused continuously by intravenous route after 2 g loading dose (adjusted in case of renal failure)

Piperacillin/tazobactam or temocillin

2 g every 8 hours by intravenous route (adjusted in case of renal failure)

Meropenem

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients ≥ 18-year-old
  • Hospitalized in the ICU
  • Severe infection, eg sepsis or septic shock (according to the Sepsis-3 definition) Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, characterized by an increase of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 points or more. This increase in 2 points will be calculated the day infection is diagnosed (day of positive culture serving as reference for the infection) as compared to the day before infection onset.
  • Septic shock is defined as sepsis and persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg and having a serum lactate level \>2 mmol/l despite adequate volume resuscitation.
  • This criterion (sepsis or septic shock) has to be fulfilled within a time frame of +/- 24 hours from the day of infection diagnosis (i.e. the day of positive bacteriological sample).
  • Pathogen responsible for infection is an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to meropenem and either to piperacillin/tazobactam (minimum inhibitory concentration \<8 mg/L) or to temocillin (minimum inhibitory concentration ≤8 mg/L)

You may not qualify if:

  • Affiliation to social security (AME excluded)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Known allergy to beta-lactam
  • Patient with severe neutropenia, as defined by absolute neutrophil count \<0.5x109/L
  • Infection requiring prolonged antimicrobial treatment (endocarditis; mediastinitis; osteomyelitis/septic arthritis; undrainable/undrained abscess; unremovable/unremoved prosthetic-associated infection)
  • Decision of withholding/withdrawing care
  • Patient with concomitant infection requiring antibiotics with activity against Gram-negative bacilli, including patient with polymicrobial infection with pathogen resistant to study drugs
  • Hypersensitivity to any components of the formulations

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

LUYT Charles -Edouard

Paris, 75013, France

RECRUITING

MAYAUX Julien

Paris, 75013, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisShock, SepticInfections

Interventions

PiperacillinTazobactamtemocillinMeropenem

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AmpicillinPenicillin GPenicillinsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesOrganic ChemicalsSulfur CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPenicillanic AcidSulfonesThienamycinsCarbapenems

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Posted

October 4, 2022

Study Start

March 11, 2023

Primary Completion

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations