Improving CRT Outcome With Non-Invasive Cardiac Mapping
ICONIC-M
ICONIC-M: Improving CRT Outcome With Non-Invasive Cardiac Mapping. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study To Assess Patient Response to CRT Comparing ECGI Map Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement With Empirical Lead Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
330
4 countries
11
Brief Summary
The ICONIC-M study is a multicenter randomized controlled study to assess patient response to CRT comparing ECGI map guided left ventricular lead placement with empirical lead placement. The hypothesis of the investigation is to demonstrate that CRT LV lead implantation guided by a map obtained with the Amycard 01C System and showing LV Latest Electrical Activated Site (LEAS) in combination with a CT cardiac venogram improves CRT outcome. An improved CRT outcome is defined as a ≥30% increase in LVESVi reduction compared to empiric CRT LV lead implantation. The sample size will be 136 in the Control arm and 194 in the Active arm. A total of 330 subjects. The study follows an adaptive design, in where one interim analysis at 70% enrollment will be performed. The sponsor may stop enrollment when either one of the following conditions apply:
- Statistical significant difference between groups in the primary endpoint has been reached confirming a difference in reduction of the LVESVi of ≥30% in the Active arm compared to the Control arm
- There is no trend or reason to believe statistical significance will be reached with a higher sample size. Statistical significance (primary endpoint) is reached at interim (70%) or at total (100%) of enrollment with a significance value P lower than 0.025.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
August 7, 2025
August 1, 2025
3.7 years
September 29, 2022
August 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi)
Reduction versus baseline of LVESVi as measured by transthoracic echocardiography
6 months post CRT implantation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Successfully placed LV leads
6 months post CRT implantation
Correctly predicted distance between latest activation site and LV lead
6 months post implantation
Other Outcomes (4)
Clinical Composite Score
6 months post CRT implantation
ECGi acquisition procedural failure rate
6 months post CRT implantation
Subgroup analysis
6 months post CRT implantation
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe CRT device is implanted according to clinical practice, without pre-implantation planning. The outcome of the procedure is assessed via echography as per clinical practice. In addition to clinical practice, the subjects are required to fill in a quality-of-life questionnaire and are subject to an ECG mapping procedure with the Amycard 01C device, including non-contrast CT, to assess the distance between left ventricular lead placement and the latest electrical activation site in the absence of planning information.
Active
EXPERIMENTALA pre-implantation ECG mapping with the Amycard 01C device, including CT, is performed prior to the CRT device implantation. The resulting target area for the left ventricular lead placement is communicated to the implanting physician, who will attempt to reach a point close to the target, using the available venous access. At six-month follow-up, response to the therapy is assessed using echocardiography, and a second ECG mapping with Amycard 01C is performed, to assess the distance between actual implantation site and target in the presence of pre-implantation planning information.
Interventions
ECGi mapping using the CE marked Amycard 01C device and a contrast enhanced CT
ECGi mapping using the CE marked Amycard 01C device and a non-contrast CT
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Appropriately signed and dated informed consent.
- Age ≥18 years at time of consent.
- Received optimal medical therapy for HF for at least 3 months before screening
- Patient in sinus rhythm at the time of screening fulfilling Class I or IIa criteria per ESC CRT guidelines 2013 .
- Patient is intended for placement of a CRT device with biventricular (BiV) pacing.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous cardiac pacemaker/CRT/ICD implantation
- Acute diseases or exacerbations of chronic diseases (as per the investigator's discretion)
- Contraindications to CT scanning
- Contraindications to body surface ECG mapping: (ongoing wound healing on the chest (e.g. recent surgery), skin diseases, allergic reactions to surface mapping electrodes and medical band-aid)
- Pregnant, or subjects planning to become pregnant within 6 months after signing informed consent (a documented negative pregnancy test (serum or blood) is required for women of childbearing potential)
- Incapacitated individuals, defined as persons who are mentally ill, mentally handicapped, or individuals without legal authority, are excluded from the study population
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- EP Solutions SAlead
- QserveCROcollaborator
Study Sites (11)
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Groningen University Medical Center
Groningen, Netherlands
Leids Universitair Medical Center
Leiden, Netherlands
Maastricht University Hospital
Maastricht, Netherlands
Utrecht University Medical Center
Utrecht, Netherlands
Hospital da Luz
Lisbon, Portugal
Lund University Hospital
Lund, Sweden
Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
Bart's Hospital
London, United Kingdom
King's College
London, United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospital
Oxford, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Niraj Varma, Prof.
The Cleveland Clinic
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2022
First Posted
October 4, 2022
Study Start
December 20, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08