NCT05560425

Brief Summary

Lifetime risk for developing an alcohol use disorder increases with earlier onset of alcohol consumption. This risk may reflect a tendency for escalated alcohol intake among youth due to immature executive control, leading to more frequent binge drinking, which is associated with more alcohol-related problems. Binge drinking is associated with deficits in behavioral flexibility, which may suggest impaired control networks that contribute to automatic behavior. Individuals with an alcohol or substance use disorder (A/SUD) exhibit attentional bias toward drug- or alcohol-related stimuli that have attained salience through consistent use. Reward history increases attention towards non-drug stimuli, even among individuals with no lifetime A/SUD. Preliminary data (from Dr. Boettiger's lab) from a nationally representative US adult sample using data collected via Prolific found that a questionnaire measure of mindfulness moderates the relationship between alcohol misuse and attention to reward. Given evidence that heavy alcohol drinking impairs behavioral flexibility, which in turn promotes escalating intake, insight into the relationship between mindfulness and behavioral flexibility could inspire new strategies to prevent alcohol and substance use disorders in people at elevated risk.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2022

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 11, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 26, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 26, 2022

Results QC Date

September 9, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Attentional BiasAlcohol MisuseEmerging AdultsMindfulness Meditation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Participant Retention

    Participant retention will be measured by the percentage of enrolled participants remaining in the study after 6 visits.

    10 weeks

  • Compliance With Independent Training of Skills

    To determine participant compliance with training skills learned during each of the 4 virtual visits, the average number of journal entries logged during the 4 weeks of training, for each group, is calculated as a total score (6 times/week x 4 weeks = 24). Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater compliance with independent training.

    6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Average CEQ Ratings - Credibility Subscale

    1 week

  • Average CEQ Ratings - Expectancy Subscale

    1 week

  • Mean Change in Emotional Distress Scores

    Baseline, Week 6

  • Participant Satisfaction

    5 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Navigating College (NC) Training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control Group

Behavioral: Navigating College (NC) Training

Koru Mindfulness (KM) Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Study Group

Behavioral: Koru Mindfulness (KM) Training

Interventions

The Koru Basic curriculum consists of four weekly interactive 75-minute classes delivered online through Zoom. Each class consists of an overview of 2-3 skills, group practice of the skills, and group reflection. Topics discussed during each training visit include: belly breathing, dynamic breathing, body scan (week 1); walking meditation, gatha (week 2); guided imagery, labeling thoughts (week 3); eating meditation, and labeling feelings (week 4). Participants are instructed to practice a skill for 10 minutes/day and log any reflection on that practice using the Koru phone application.

Also known as: Koru Basic
Koru Mindfulness (KM) Training

With topics discussed from the Freshman Survival Guide book, this training provides a closely matched active control group for KM Training. The training consists of four weekly 75-minute classes delivered online through Zoom. Each class consists of lecture and group discussions on topics related to navigating college. Topics discussed during each training visit include: habits, roommate issues, homesickness, the internet (week 1); strategies when sinking, study skills, getting involved, habit formation (week 2); HALT, gateway habit (week 3); and academic success tips, taking notes, and procrastination (week 4). Participants are instructed to journal about learned information and skills for 10 minutes/day.

Navigating College (NC) Training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 19 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • High school educated; college enrolled first-year student
  • Medically healthy
  • Ages 18-19
  • Native-English speaker (or fluent \< 7 years old)
  • Self-report of \>4 lifetime binge drinking episodes (\>4 drinks/2hours for females, \>5 drinks/2 hours for males).

You may not qualify if:

  • Psychiatric disease (such as depression or psychosis) using the MINI \[25\]
  • Systemic disease such as cancer, cardiovascular or inflammatory disease which could influence cognitive functioning
  • Motor or visual disturbance (e.g., colorblind)
  • Current use of psychoactive drugs (aside from moderate caffeine or alcohol), including prescription medications, or individuals with a known history of any substance use disorders (not including alcohol; including nicotine) or desire to seek treatment for excess substance (not including alcohol) use.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-3270, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Spear LP. Effects of adolescent alcohol consumption on the brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Apr;19(4):197-214. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2018.10. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

    PMID: 29467469BACKGROUND
  • Mehrabian A, Russell JA. A questionnaire measure of habitual alcohol use. Psychol Rep. 1978 Dec;43(3 Pt 1):803-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3.803. No abstract available.

    PMID: 740823BACKGROUND
  • Gass JT, Glen WB Jr, McGonigal JT, Trantham-Davidson H, Lopez MF, Randall PK, Yaxley R, Floresco SB, Chandler LJ. Adolescent alcohol exposure reduces behavioral flexibility, promotes disinhibition, and increases resistance to extinction of ethanol self-administration in adulthood. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Oct;39(11):2570-83. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.109. Epub 2014 May 13.

    PMID: 24820536BACKGROUND
  • Sey NYA, Gomez-A A, Madayag AC, Boettiger CA, Robinson DL. Adolescent intermittent ethanol impairs behavioral flexibility in a rat foraging task in adulthood. Behav Brain Res. 2019 Nov 5;373:112085. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112085. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

    PMID: 31319133BACKGROUND
  • Chanon VW, Sours CR, Boettiger CA. Attentional bias toward cigarette cues in active smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Oct;212(3):309-20. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1953-1. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

    PMID: 20668841BACKGROUND
  • Field M, Marhe R, Franken IH. The clinical relevance of attentional bias in substance use disorders. CNS Spectr. 2014 Jun;19(3):225-30. doi: 10.1017/S1092852913000321. Epub 2013 May 13.

    PMID: 23663386BACKGROUND
  • Field M, Werthmann J, Franken I, Hofmann W, Hogarth L, Roefs A. The role of attentional bias in obesity and addiction. Health Psychol. 2016 Aug;35(8):767-80. doi: 10.1037/hea0000405.

    PMID: 27505196BACKGROUND
  • Masiero M, Lucchiari C, Maisonneuve P, Pravettoni G, Veronesi G, Mazzocco K. The Attentional Bias in Current and Former Smokers. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jul 10;13:154. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00154. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31354446BACKGROUND
  • Meyer KN, Sheridan MA, Hopfinger JB. Reward history impacts attentional orienting and inhibitory control on untrained tasks. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Nov;82(8):3842-3862. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02130-y.

    PMID: 32935290BACKGROUND
  • Greeson JM, Juberg MK, Maytan M, James K, Rogers H. A randomized controlled trial of Koru: a mindfulness program for college students and other emerging adults. J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(4):222-33. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.887571.

    PMID: 24499130BACKGROUND
  • Anderson BA, Laurent PA, Yantis S. Value-driven attentional capture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 21;108(25):10367-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

    PMID: 21646524BACKGROUND
  • Anderson BA, Kim H, Britton MK, Kim AJ. Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ). Psychol Res. 2020 Nov;84(8):2122-2137. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01212-3. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

    PMID: 31190092BACKGROUND
  • Carmody J, Baer RA. Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. J Behav Med. 2008 Feb;31(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9130-7. Epub 2007 Sep 25.

    PMID: 17899351BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alcoholism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Alcohol-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Elena Vidrascu, PhD, MSc
Organization
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Study Officials

  • Charlotte Boettiger, PhD

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: parallel assignment randomized controlled trial feasibility study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Posted

September 29, 2022

Study Start

September 11, 2023

Primary Completion

December 20, 2023

Study Completion

December 20, 2023

Last Updated

November 26, 2024

Results First Posted

November 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina (UNC).

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
Access Criteria
Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Locations