ROBERT® as an Intervention to Enhance Muscle Strength After Spinal Cord Injury
Feasibility and Effect Size of an Intervention to Enhance Muscle Strength Assisted by Robotic Technology (ROBERT®) in Subacute Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating life event with long term consequences both physically and mentally. SCI is defined as either complete or incomplete according to the International Standards of the Neurological Classification of SCI. The primary consequence of a SCI is paralysis/partial paralysis affecting the person's ability to independently functioning in everyday life e.g. in and out of bed, sit to stand and walking. To regain the ability to transfer and walk the most important prerequisite is to rebuild as much strength as possible in the lower extremities. The optimal training paradigm to increase strength in partial paralysed muscles is unclear. Rehabilitation robots are upcoming methods to treat sensorimotor deficits after SCI. The rehabilitation robot ROBERT might contribute to enhance muscle strength for people with very weak strength following an incomplete SCI. The overall objective of this Ph.D project is to investigate the feasibility and effect size of a muscle strength training intervention assisted by ROBERT® for patients with SCI and severe paresis (muscle strength 1-3 in hip flexion).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedApril 17, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.7 years
November 12, 2021
April 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Muscle strength in Newton
Change in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in isometric muscle strength (N) of hip flexion (8 weeks - baseline)
At baseline and at 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Chance in EMG activity
At baseline and at 8 weeks
Change in repetitions
At baseline and at 8 weeks
Difference between legs in numbers of hip flexion
At 4 weeks
Change in spasticity
At baseline and at 8 weeks
Change in muscle thickness
At baseline and at 8 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Acceptability and suitability of the intervention - patients' perspective
At 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
ROBERT
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention group will receive usual practice. As add-on, the intervention leg will receive 3-4 sets of 15-20 repetitions (30 seconds rest between each set) of muscle strength training for hip flexion with ROBERT® three times a week.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONUsual practice in the control group consist of 3-5 times physiotherapy a week for 8 weeks. A session last 45 minutes. The sessions are individually adapted and can contain exercise therapy, functional training, assistive devices, electrical stimulation, hydrotherapy and tread mill training.
Interventions
Intervention: Training will be conducted with the robot ROBERT®. 3 times a week for 8 weeks the patient will conduct 60 repetitions of hip flexion of one leg. The patient is lying supine. ROBERT is attached to the patient's lower leg. The physiotherapist guides the patient's leg in hip flexion and ROBERT record the movement. The ROBERT is attached to the patient's lower leg and thereby eliminating the gravity of the leg. The physiotherapist guides the patient's leg in hip flexion and ROBERT record the movement. ROBERT is set in active or guided mode and will be individually adjusted. When practice starts the patient get visual feedback to the range of movement of the hip flexion plus the amount of repetitions conducted and persisting.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- SCI (\< 12 month),
- Age ≥ 18 year
- Muscle strength 1 - 3 in hip flexion in both legs measured by manual muscle testing.
- Sufficient Danish or English to be able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous cerebral injury or SCI
- Previous damage to peripheral nervous system in lower extremities
- Instable fractures in thorax or lower extremities
- Muscle strength 0, 4 or 5 in hip flexion
- Weight \> 150 kg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark
Viborg, Central Jutland, 8800, Denmark
Related Publications (3)
Sorensen SL, Poulsen I. Patients' and physiotherapists' experiences with robotic technologies for lower extremity rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: a reflexive thematic analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Oct 17:1-14. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2573170. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41105483DERIVEDLillelund Sorensen S, Lipperts M, Nielsen JF, Naess-Schmidt E. Clinical validation of a rule-based decision tree algorithm for classifying hip movements in people with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 Mar 31:1-10. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2025.2472096. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40163036DERIVEDSorensen SL, Poulsen I, Harvey LA, Biering-Sorensen F, Nielsen JF. Robotic technology (ROBERT(R)) to enhance muscle strength in the hip flexor muscles following spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2024 Apr 10;10(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41394-024-00630-9.
PMID: 38600074DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susanne Lillelund, MSc, PT
Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Randomization is performed after baseline assesment. The outcomes assessor will be blinded to treatment/control group at follow-up assesment
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2021
First Posted
September 28, 2022
Study Start
September 21, 2022
Primary Completion
May 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
April 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share