The Feasibility and Effects of Low-load Blood-flow Restricted Exercise Following Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spinal cord injury (SCI): The World Health Organization estimates an incidence of 250,000 to 500,000 per year worldwide. In Denmark 130 new cases of SCI per year. SCI is a devastating condition: paresis/paralysis of the skeletal muscles below the injury site, partial or complete inability to walk, move and/or feel. Other sequelae are: infections, lifestyle diseases (cardiovascular, diabetes, nephrologic disease), mental wellbeing/suicide-risk profoundly raised , quality of life, next-of-kin affection. Recovery of motor function is high clinical priority and crucial for improved ADL outcomes. Strength training regimens have shown improved muscle strength in healthy subjects using near-maximal voluntary effort contractions, and few studies have demonstrated similar effects in a SCI population. Atrophy and fatigability and spasticity may reduce practical implementation for rehabilitation. Therefore, low-load blood-flow restricted exercise (BFRE) may prove beneficial as supplement to traditional rehabilitation, increasing muscle strength and inducing hypertrophy in healthy persons. BFRE is performed as low-intensity strength training (20-30 % of max) while simultaneously involving the use of circumferential placement of cuffs during exercise, to maintain arterial inflow to the muscle while preventing venous return. Based on existing scientific evidence, BFRE is acknowledged as a safe regime without serious side effects. Previously, the method has shown increased muscle strength and inducing skeletal muscle hypertrophy in addition to improvement in gait performance in individuals with various diseases causing reduced mobility. Purposes of this PhD project: to investigate the feasibility and effects of BFRE in individuals living with the consequences of SCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2024
CompletedMarch 31, 2023
March 1, 2023
3.8 years
September 20, 2018
March 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in MVC
Changes in maximum, voluntary, isometric muscle strength (Muscle torque, MVC) of the m. quadriceps and hamstrings from baseline to follow-up
1 week before treatment; 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after start of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in Rate of force development (RFD)
1 week before treatment; 4-,8- and 12-weeks after start of treatment
Change in muscle and tendon thickness
1 week before treatment; 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after start of treatment
Change in The Spinal Cord Ability Ruler (SCAR)
1 week before treatment; 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after start of treatment
Timed Up & Go Test (TUG)
1 week before treatment; 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after start of treatment
Timed 10 Meter Walk Test
1 week before treatment; 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after start of treatment
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
active BFRE
ACTIVE COMPARATOR14 consecutive SCI patients are block-randomized to active arm
sham BFRE
SHAM COMPARATOR14 consecutive SCI patients are block-randomized to sham arm
Interventions
BFR will be performed in the aBFRE group by use of pneumatic occlusion cuffs placed proximally on the thigh close to the inguinal fold, using an occlusion pressure corresponding to 40 % of seated arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). The individual AOP will be documented at baseline using doppler ultrasound (Siemens ACUSON S2000TM). Previous studies have shown that this pressure level can promote significant muscle adaptations to a similar degree and are associated with significantly less discomfort than higher occlusion pressures. The occlusion pressure of the participants in sham BFRE group will be 10mmHg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Duration of SCI \> 1 year,
- years of age or older
- Exhibit a grade 2, 3 or 4 muscle function of the knee flexors and/or extensors
- Classification of grades A, B, C or D on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) scale
- Cognitive ability to follow instructions
You may not qualify if:
- Substance abuse
- Severe mental illness
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Severe arteriosclerosis, coronary arterial disease
- History of severe autonomic dysreflexia
- Deep venous thrombosis (or severe coagulation dysfunction)
- Collagen diseases such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Marfan's Syndrome
- Severe neuropathies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmarklead
- University of Southern Denmarkcollaborator
- Aarhus University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark
Viborg, 8800, Denmark
Related Publications (27)
Reed R, Mehra M, Kirshblum S, Maier D, Lammertse D, Blight A, Rupp R, Jones L, Abel R, Weidner N; EMSCI Study Group; SCOPE; Curt A, Steeves J. Spinal cord ability ruler: an interval scale to measure volitional performance after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017 Aug;55(8):730-738. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.1. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
PMID: 28322239BACKGROUNDAagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Oct;93(4):1318-26. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00283.2002.
PMID: 12235031BACKGROUNDGregory CM, Bowden MG, Jayaraman A, Shah P, Behrman A, Kautz SA, Vandenborne K. Resistance training and locomotor recovery after incomplete spinal cord injury: a case series. Spinal Cord. 2007 Jul;45(7):522-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102002. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
PMID: 17228358BACKGROUNDHarvey LA, Fornusek C, Bowden JL, Pontifex N, Glinsky J, Middleton JW, Gandevia SC, Davis GM. Electrical stimulation plus progressive resistance training for leg strength in spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord. 2010 Jul;48(7):570-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.191. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
PMID: 20065991BACKGROUNDGorgey AS, Timmons MK, Dolbow DR, Bengel J, Fugate-Laus KC, Michener LA, Gater DR. Electrical stimulation and blood flow restriction increase wrist extensor cross-sectional area and flow meditated dilatation following spinal cord injury. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jun;116(6):1231-44. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3385-z. Epub 2016 May 7.
PMID: 27155846BACKGROUNDPelletier CA, Hicks AL. Muscle fatigue characteristics in paralyzed muscle after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011 Jan;49(1):125-30. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.62. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
PMID: 20531355BACKGROUNDSlysz J, Stultz J, Burr JF. The efficacy of blood flow restricted exercise: A systematic review & meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Aug;19(8):669-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
PMID: 26463594BACKGROUNDLoenneke JP, Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Zourdos MC, Bemben MG. Low intensity blood flow restriction training: a meta-analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 May;112(5):1849-59. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2167-x. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
PMID: 21922259BACKGROUNDTakarada Y, Takazawa H, Sato Y, Takebayashi S, Tanaka Y, Ishii N. Effects of resistance exercise combined with moderate vascular occlusion on muscular function in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Jun;88(6):2097-106. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.2097.
PMID: 10846023BACKGROUNDLoenneke JP, Wilson JM, Wilson GJ, Pujol TJ, Bemben MG. Potential safety issues with blood flow restriction training. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Aug;21(4):510-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01290.x. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
PMID: 21410544BACKGROUNDCook SB, LaRoche DP, Villa MR, Barile H, Manini TM. Blood flow restricted resistance training in older adults at risk of mobility limitations. Exp Gerontol. 2017 Dec 1;99:138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
PMID: 28987643BACKGROUNDFerraz RB, Gualano B, Rodrigues R, Kurimori CO, Fuller R, Lima FR, DE Sa-Pinto AL, Roschel H. Benefits of Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction in Knee Osteoarthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 May;50(5):897-905. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001530.
PMID: 29266093BACKGROUNDJorgensen AN, Aagaard P, Nielsen JL, Frandsen U, Diederichsen LP. Effects of blood-flow-restricted resistance training on muscle function in a 74-year-old male with sporadic inclusion body myositis: a case report. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016 Nov;36(6):504-509. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12259. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PMID: 26095885BACKGROUNDItzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Glaser E, Zeilig G, Aito S, Scivoletto G, Mecci M, Chadwick RJ, El Masry WS, Osman A, Glass CA, Silva P, Soni BM, Gardner BP, Savic G, Bergstrom EM, Bluvshtein V, Ronen J, Catz A. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1926-33. doi: 10.1080/09638280601046302. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
PMID: 17852230BACKGROUNDKirshblum SC, Waring W, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Johansen M, Schmidt-Read M, Donovan W, Graves D, Jha A, Jones L, Mulcahey MJ, Krassioukov A. Reference for the 2011 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):547-54. doi: 10.1179/107902611X13186000420242.
PMID: 22330109BACKGROUNDKalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, Duff S, Popovic MR, Rudhe C, Fehlings MG, Verrier MC. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 20;29(5):905-14. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1504. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
PMID: 21568688BACKGROUNDWhitehurst DG, Engel L, Bryan S. Short Form health surveys and related variants in spinal cord injury research: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Mar;37(2):128-38. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000159. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
PMID: 24559417BACKGROUNDWressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure--Swedish version. Can J Occup Ther. 2002 Feb;69(1):40-8. doi: 10.1177/000841740206900104.
PMID: 11852689BACKGROUNDStark T, Walker B, Phillips JK, Fejer R, Beck R. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review. PM R. 2011 May;3(5):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.025.
PMID: 21570036BACKGROUNDGorgey AS, Timmons MK, Michener LA, Ericksen JJ, Gater DR. Intra-rater reliability of ultrasound imaging of wrist extensor muscles in patients with tetraplegia. PM R. 2014 Feb;6(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.607. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
PMID: 24041587BACKGROUNDPhadke CP, Robertson CT, Condliffe EG, Patten C. Upper-extremity H-reflex measurement post-stroke: reliability and inter-limb differences. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Aug;123(8):1606-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
PMID: 22277759BACKGROUNDAnsari NN, Naghdi S, Arab TK, Jalaie S. The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of muscle spasticity: limb and muscle group effect. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(3):231-7.
PMID: 18560139BACKGROUNDKlomjai W, Katz R, Lackmy-Vallee A. Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Sep;58(4):208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
PMID: 26319963BACKGROUNDMaxwell L, Santesso N, Tugwell PS, Wells GA, Judd M, Buchbinder R. Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews. J Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;33(11):2304-11.
PMID: 17086611BACKGROUNDStavres J, Singer TJ, Brochetti A, Kilbane MJ, Brose SW, McDaniel J. The Feasibility of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury. PM R. 2018 Dec;10(12):1368-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 23.
PMID: 29802910BACKGROUNDJonsson AB, Krogh S, Lillelund S, Aagaard P, Kasch H, Nielsen JF. Efficacy of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise for Improving Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Function in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Dec;34(12):e14759. doi: 10.1111/sms.14759.
PMID: 39636092DERIVEDJonsson AB, Krogh S, Severinsen KE, Aagaard P, Kasch H, Nielsen JF. Feasibility and safety of two weeks of blood flow restriction exercise in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2026 Jan;49(1):58-67. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2408052. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
PMID: 39392467DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen, MD,PhD,Prof.
Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Prior to the first training session, participants will be block-randomized to either active BFRE (n=12) or sham BFRE (n=12), (control for gender). The participants will be blinded from the randomization
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Director, Professor; PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2018
First Posted
October 1, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 28, 2024
Study Completion
October 31, 2024
Last Updated
March 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share