NCT05558163

Brief Summary

The main goals of this study are to examine the superiority of this novel technique and its acceptance by patients with ED candidate for PPI and compare these results with data available in the literature for ordinary peno-scrotal incision.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2022

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 25, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

erectyle dysfunctionpenile prothesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Subjective cure rate

    will be judged according to rate of wound healing, cosmotic final results, scar tension and scar pain.

    3 to 4 weaks

  • Objective cure rate

    should include rate of complications as fistula, scar, extensive fibrosis, infection rate, incidence of prosthetic removal.

    4-12 weaks

Study Arms (2)

PPI through traditional penoscrotal approach

OTHER

cases of erectyl dysfunction who underwent PPI throug penoscrotal approach

Procedure: penoscrotal approach for PPI

PPI through novel transverse scrotal approach

OTHER

cases of erectyl dysfunction who underwent PPI throug novel transverse scrotal approach

Procedure: transverse scrotal approach for PPI

Interventions

penile prothesis implantation through penoscrotal approach outcome

PPI through novel transverse scrotal approach

penile prothesis implantation through penoscrotal approach outcome

PPI through traditional penoscrotal approach

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 60 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • The study participants are male patients who are candidate for penile prosthesis implantation and will accept to do minimal scrotal incision procedure for treatment of ED.

You may not qualify if:

  • male patients with active scrotal infection.
  • contraindicaions to anasthesia.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

InfectionsInflammation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients who will undergo scrotal approach will be compared with a case-matched of patients who underwent PPI through peno-scrotal approach in our institution during the last 5 years.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
clinical professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2022

First Posted

September 28, 2022

Study Start

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion

November 1, 2023

Study Completion

December 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09