A Clinical Trial Comparing FS With ZOE and Non-eugenol Based Materials in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies
A Comparative Assessment Clinical Trial Comparing Ferric Sulfate With Zinc-oxide Eugenol and Non-eugenol Based Materials for Pulpotomy in Primary Molar Teeth
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Internal resorption in the most common cause of failure in FS pulpotomies in primary molars. This has been attributed to the release of free eugenol from the zinc and eugenol mixture of the base material over the pulp tissue. Zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) paste is the most common base material placed over the infected pulp tissues during pulpotomies of primary molars, however the evidence suggests that the eugenol component has been associated with the failure of the vital pulp treatment in primary molars. Cavit (3M, US) is another base material that contains Zinc-oxide, zinc sulphate, and calcium salts without eugenol. The effectiveness of non-eugenol based Zinc oxide as a base material over ferric sulphate treated pulp has not been explored. The hypothesis is that the non-eugenol based ZOE could be used as an alternate to eugenol based ZOE and thereby avoid the radiological failures. Therefore, this randomized controlled clinical split-mouth trial aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of eugenol and non-eugenol based ZOE on the success of primary tooth pulpotomies where FS is used as a medicament.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1
Started Feb 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedFebruary 26, 2025
February 1, 2025
2 years
September 7, 2022
February 25, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical success rate
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if there were no pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion, abscess or abnormal mobility.
36 months
Radiographic success rate
1. Normal periodontal ligament space 2. No inter-radicular or periapical radiolucency 3. No internal or external root resorption
36 months
Study Arms (2)
non-eugenol based ZOE and Ferric Sulfate
EXPERIMENTALnon-eugenol based ZOE and Ferric Sulfate in primary molar pulpotomy procedures.
eugenol based zinc oxide and Ferric Sulfate
EXPERIMENTALeugenol based zinc oxide and Ferric Sulfate in primary molars pulpotomies procedures.
Interventions
non-eugenol based ZOE base material placed over ferric sulphate, during vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy) in primary molars
eugenol based zinc oxide base material placed over Ferric Sulfate medicament, during vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy) in primary molars
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 3 to 7 years old.
- Carious teeth with clinical and radiographic diagnosis of reversible pulpitis
- Only teeth having no more than one third of their roots undergoing physiologic resorption were included.
- Restorable with stainless steel crown
You may not qualify if:
- clinical or radiographic evidence of pulp degeneration
- excessive bleeding
- pathologic mobility
- swelling or fistula
- history of spontaneous and nocturnal pain
- tenderness to percussion or palpation
- external or internal root resorption : {The primary teeth undergo resorption due to developing permanent teeth which is considered normal. Presence of internal root resorption will be considered as a failure (pathological change). Alternatively external root resorption will not be considered as a failure (physiological change}
- inter radicular or periapical radiolucency.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jayakumar Jayaraman, BDS MDS PhD
Virginia Commonwealth University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2022
First Posted
September 28, 2022
Study Start
February 2, 2023
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share