Feasibility of the YATAC Programme
YATAC
The 'Young Adult Taking Action' Programme for Young Adult Cancer Survivors: a Feasibility Study Evaluating Content and Delivery
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Young adult cancer survivors (YACS) aged 18-39 report physical and psychosocial late effects following cancer treatment, impairing quality of life and participation in everyday life. To address such multifactorial challenges complex or multicomponent rehabilitation interventions are needed. Based on this, the 'Young Adult Taking Action' (YATAC) programme was developed to increase participation in everyday life and improve health-related quality of life. The development of the intervention is guided by the British Medical Research Council's guidance (MRC) and the framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions by Hawkins et al. The present study will investigate the acceptability and fidelity of the intervention at the research clinic of REHPA, the Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care in Nyborg, Denmark. A mixed method one-armed feasibility study will be conducted and the results of the study will be used to revise version 1.0 of the programme.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer
Started Aug 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2023
CompletedMarch 29, 2023
March 1, 2023
3 months
September 8, 2022
March 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Acceptability; Affective attitude
The participants feelings about the intervention. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating better feeling.
10 weeks
Fidelity
Defined as the consistency of whether the intervention was implemented as intended. The professionals register to what extent they have implemented the session as intended on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher consistency.
10 weeks
Dose
Defined as the quantity of intervention implemented. The professionals will report the number of elements implemented and the time used. In addition, the professional will give information on reasons for deviation from the manual.
10 weeks
Adaptions
Defined as any adjustments made to the intervention. The professionals register and describe any adaptions they make and the reasons for this.
10 weeks
Acceptability; burden
The participants perceived amount of effort required to participate. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating high degree of effort.
10 weeks
Acceptability; Ethicality
The participants opinion about the intervention's fit with their individuals value system. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher consistency with value system.
10 weeks
Acceptability; intervention cohesion
The participants understanding of the intervention and how it works. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher understanding of the intervention.
10 weeks
Acceptability; opportunity costs
The participants experience of opportunity costs, like benefits, values, or profits that must be given up to engage in the intervention. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher degree of giving up on opportunity costs, like benefits, values, or profits.
10 weeks
Acceptability; Perceived effectiveness
The participants experience of perceived effectiveness of the intervention. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher degree of perceived effectiveness of the intervention.
10 weeks
Acceptability; Self-efficacy
The participants confidence that they can perform the behavior(s) required to participate in the intervention. Scores between 0-5, with higher scores indicating higher confidence that they can perform the behavior(s) required to participate in the intervention.
10 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Young Adults Taking Action
EXPERIMENTALThe programme is person-centered, goal-oriented, and peer-based and is structured around a 5-day residential stay, an online follow-up after five weeks and a 2-day residential follow-up stay after ten weeks.
Interventions
The programme consists of 22 sessions focusing on; 1) everyday life (energy conservation, cognitive challenges, fatigue); 2) Physical activity; 3) psychological issues; 4) work and study d; 5) sexuality and relationship; 7) rights and finance, and 8) goal setting. The sessions include both education, workshops, and engagement in different activities and will be delivered by a multidisciplinary team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being between 18-39 years old at baseline
- Have had any type of cancer
- Have completed primary/active cancer directed treatment (cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation therapy and/or definitive surgical intervention, while current hormonal treatments or maintenance therapies are permissible)
- Determined a need for rehabilitation determined by the REHPA scale (a linear analogue scale, where the participants indicate how close they are to living the life they desire after ending cancer treatment). The scale ranges from 0= 'goal reached' to 9= 'infinitely far from'
- Have access to a device with Internet options (i.e., smartphone or tablet)
You may not qualify if:
- Dependent in basic personal activities of daily living (personal care, dressing and eating)
- No permanent residence in Denmark
- Not able to speak and understand Danish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care
Nyborg, The Region of Southern Denmark, 5800, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria Aagesen, PhD student
The University of Southern Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2022
First Posted
September 22, 2022
Study Start
August 30, 2022
Primary Completion
November 30, 2022
Study Completion
February 28, 2023
Last Updated
March 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share