High Intensity Functional Training in the Rehabilitation of Cancer Survivors
2 other identifiers
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to investigate changes in health related quality of life (HRQoL) and cancer-related fatigue (CRF) following a 16-weeks of HIFT as a part of the rehabilitation of cancer survivors. Additionally, we will investigate the continuation of participation in any High Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) program, three as well as 12 months following completion of the exercise intervention. The intervention containing high intensity functional training will take place in a pragmatic clinical setting at the Center for Cancer and Health in Copenhagen. We hypothesize that the HIFT will be be associated with improved HRQoL and CRF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer
Started Aug 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 6, 2020
November 1, 2020
7 months
June 19, 2019
November 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Health related quality of life
Change in HRQoL from baseline to end point and from end point to follow up at 3 and 12 months, will be evaluated using the Global Health Status/Quality of Life item from the EORTC QLQ-C-30 questionnaire. EORTC QLQ-C-30 includes five functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social, where higher scores represent greater function or quality of life) and three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea). Functional and symptom scales range from 0 to 100. Higher values on functional scales equal a higher level of functioning. Higher values on symptom scales equal higher symptom burden. EORTC QLQ-C-30 is chosen for it's established reliability and validity with specific emphasis on use in cancer populations
For each participant at baseline + end point at 16 weeks + follow up at 3 month and 12 months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Symptoms and function
For each participant at baseline + end point at 16 weeks + follow up at 3 month and 12 months)
Leisure time physical activity level
Time frame for each participant: Baseline + end point at 16 weeks + follow up at 3 months and 12 months
Continued participation in high intensity functional training (post-intervention)
Time frame: for each participant at follow up at 3 month and 12 months
Study Arms (1)
High Intensity Functional Training
EXPERIMENTALIntervention group assigned to 16 weeks of group-based high intensity functional training supervised by physiotherapists.
Interventions
The exercise intervention for this study will be HIFT, defined as a style of training that incorporates functional, multimodal movements, performed at relatively high intensity, and designed to improve parameters of general physical fitness and performance. The program design and template will be based on the principles of the HIFT program called CrossFit®. CrossFit is described as a strength and conditioning program that focuses on "constantly varying functional movements, performed at a relatively high intensity". CrossFit training includes a variety of elements from gymnastics (e.g., floor, bar and ring exercises), weightlifting exercises (e.g., squats, cleans, snatches and presses with a barbell, dumbbell or kettlebell), and cardiovascular activities (e.g., running or rowing).
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients must be at least 18 years old
- Patients referred to the centre for cancer rehabilitation from any hospital or private practising general practitioner in the Capital Region in Denmark
- Patients who choose to participate in group based high intensity functional training that is offered at CCHC as part of their physical rehabilitation.
- Eligibility for participation in this study will be regardless of cancer treatment and the stage of the cancer. Thus, both patients undergoing active cancer treatment, patient who have completed active treatment as well as chronic cancer survivors will be considered eligible for participation in this study.
- Patients not able to reply to the questionnaire due to mental impairment
- Patients who are not able to read and understand Danish
- Patients who does not have an e-mail address because of the application of online-based questionnaires.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Center for Cancer and Health Copenhagen
Copenhagen, København N, 2200, Denmark
Related Publications (11)
Cramp F, James A, Lambert J. The effects of resistance training on quality of life in cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2010 Nov;18(11):1367-76. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0904-z. Epub 2010 May 26.
PMID: 20502922BACKGROUNDCheema B, Gaul CA, Lane K, Fiatarone Singh MA. Progressive resistance training in breast cancer: a systematic review of clinical trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 May;109(1):9-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9638-0. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
PMID: 17624588BACKGROUNDSpence RR, Heesch KC, Brown WJ. Exercise and cancer rehabilitation: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010 Apr;36(2):185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
PMID: 19962830BACKGROUNDFuller JT, Hartland MC, Maloney LT, Davison K. Therapeutic effects of aerobic and resistance exercises for cancer survivors: a systematic review of meta-analyses of clinical trials. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;52(20):1311. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098285. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
PMID: 29549149BACKGROUNDFeito Y, Heinrich KM, Butcher SJ, Poston WSC. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT): Definition and Research Implications for Improved Fitness. Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 7;6(3):76. doi: 10.3390/sports6030076.
PMID: 30087252BACKGROUNDHeinrich KM, Patel PM, O'Neal JL, Heinrich BS. High-intensity compared to moderate-intensity training for exercise initiation, enjoyment, adherence, and intentions: an intervention study. BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 3;14:789. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-789.
PMID: 25086646BACKGROUNDClaudino JG, Gabbett TJ, Bourgeois F, Souza HS, Miranda RC, Mezencio B, Soncin R, Cardoso Filho CA, Bottaro M, Hernandez AJ, Amadio AC, Serrao JC. CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2018 Feb 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5.
PMID: 29484512BACKGROUNDGodin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
PMID: 4053261BACKGROUNDAaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PMID: 8433390BACKGROUNDBechke E, Kliszczewicz B, Feito Y, Kelemen H, Nickerson B. Resting cardiac autonomic activity and body composition following a 16-week high-intensity functional training intervention in women: A pilot study. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise. 2017 Jul;12(3):680-8.
BACKGROUNDHeinrich KM, Becker C, Carlisle T, Gilmore K, Hauser J, Frye J, Harms CA. High-intensity functional training improves functional movement and body composition among cancer survivors: a pilot study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Nov;24(6):812-7. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12338. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
PMID: 26094701BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No masking.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2019
First Posted
June 27, 2019
Study Start
August 6, 2019
Primary Completion
March 15, 2020
Study Completion
April 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11