Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and the Various Forms of Atrial Fibrillation
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a global pandemic which affects around 26 million people worldwide and develops in 10% of people over 70 years . According to the results of the EPOCHA-CHF study, CHF is detected in 7-10% of cases in the Russian Federation . Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with both preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) heart failure. The prognostic impact of AF on CHF is negative, including the significant increase in mortality and hospitalization. One of the common causes of decompensation of CHF is AF. The debut of AF in CHF is one of the markers of disease progression. Rapid development in interventional cardiology due to the invention of cardiac catheter technologies during the last decades provided a new option for non-pharmacological treatment of CHF. Nowadays the use of electrophysiological methods of treatment can significantly improve the prognosis of CHF. Pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization devices, and cardioverter defibrillators are the most commonly implanted devices in patients with CHF. In 2014, the European Society of Cardiology presented a report of the European Heart Rhythm Association on the use of new devices for CHF, including the Optimizer device for delivery of cardiac contractility modulation therapy (CCM) . It is worth noting that CCM is a new step in the CHF treatment. This device is of proven benefit to patients with symptomatic heart failure on optimal medical therapy who do not qualify for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Multiple studies of CCM show clinical improvement with this therapy, including metrics such as peak VO2, 6MW, and NYHA functional class. However, the vast majority of patients enrolled in these studies were patients in sinus rhythm. As the technology progressed and the need for the trial sensing led wanted, further experiences incorporated patients with AF. A new generation of devices (Optimizer Smart®), which does not require the implantation of an atrial electrode made it possible to implant CCM in patients with AF. The present trial demonstrates the results of a pilot study conducted in National Medical Research Center of Cardiology Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation which compares the efficacy of CCM in patients with AF and ischemic and non-ischemic CHF compared to patients who received only optimal drug therapy CHF
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Aug 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 31, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2022
CompletedSeptember 22, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.3 years
January 26, 2022
September 20, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
cardiovascular death + hospitalization due to decompensation of HF
Number of Participants with cardiovascular death + hospitalization due to decompensation of HF
12 month
Secondary Outcomes (5)
death from all causes
12 month
hospitalization for any reason
12 month
development of AF paroxysm in patients with paroxysmal AF
12 month
worsening of the course of CHF, which required an outpatient visit and increased doses of diuretics
12 month
complications that required removal of the MCC
12 month
Study Arms (2)
Optimizer device
ACTIVE COMPARATOR100 patients were enrolled sequentially, 100 patients were implanted with an optimizer smart against the background of optimal drug therapy for heart failure 100 patients were implanted with a CCM Optimizer device without an atrial lead, per the protocol specifications recived optimal drug therapy CHF The following studies were performed in the 100 patients with CHF and AF before implantation of the MCC device and after 2 and 6 и 12 months of follow-up: 12-channel ECG with an estimate of the width of the QRS complex, transthoracic EchoCG,Speckle-tracking EchoCG,Myocardial work, 6-minute walk test, determination of the level of Pro-natriuretic N-terminal peptide (NT-proBNP), Holter ECG, and a questionnaire based on the Minnesota quality of life questionnaire for patients with CHF (MHFLQ).
Without Optimizer device
NO INTERVENTION100 patients were enrolled sequentially,100 patients received only optimal drug therapy for chronic heart failure 100 patients ( Without Optimizer device ) with CHF and AF before study and after 2 and 6 и 12 months of follow-up: 12-channel ECG with an estimate of the width of the QRS complex, transthoracic EchoCG,Speckle-tracking EchoCG,Myocardial work, 6-minute walk test, determination of the level of Pro-natriuretic N-terminal peptide (NT-proBNP), Holter ECG, and a questionnaire based on the Minnesota quality of life questionnaire for patients with CHF (MHFLQ).
Interventions
The CCM implantation procedure was performed in the right precordial region of the chest (the right subclavian area). Two active fixation Ingevity leads (Boston Scientific) were advanced via the right subclavian vein into the right ventricle (RV) and actively fixed to the right ventricular septum for ventricular sensing and delivery of CCM signals.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Documented HFrEF (20-40%)
- NYHA FC II-III for at least 3 months before screening
- Optimal CHF therapy and the absence of decompensations in ≥ 1 month.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Placement on the heart transplant waiting list, or post heart transplantation
- Terminal CHF
- Co-morbid diseases that may adversely affect the safety and / or efficacy of treatment
- Recent surgical intervention or trauma
- Medical conditions that limit life expectancy to 1 year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Alfiya Safiullina
Moscow, 121552, Russia
Related Publications (2)
Uskach TM, Safiullina AA, Sapel'nikov OV, Amanatova VA, Nikolaeva OA, Grishin IR, Nazarov BM, Tereshchenko SN. [Modulation of cardiac contractility in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation]. Ter Arkh. 2020 Oct 14;92(9):8-14. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2020.09.000598. Russian.
PMID: 33346425RESULTDobrovolskaya SV, Saidova MA, Safiullina AA, Uskach TM, Tereshchenko SN. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of the chronic heart failure therapy using the device cardiac contractility modulation according to the new non-invasive method of the myocardium work analysis]. Kardiologiia. 2021 Dec 31;61(12):31-40. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.12.n1849. Russian.
PMID: 35057719RESULT
Related Links
- Dynamics of Holter electrocardiogram monitoring in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation on the background of cardiac contractility modulation
- The assessment of left ventricular myocardial work in patients with chronic heart failure receiving cardiac contractility modulation therapy
- A comprehensive approach to the treatment of a patient with chronic heart failure with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction
- Possibilities of Evaluating the Dynamics of Left Ventricular Perfusion and Contractility in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure after Implantation of a Heart Contractility Modulator Using Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- Implantation of a cardiac contractility modulator in chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation: results of a 6-month follow-up of one hundred patients
- Hibernating myocardium volume in patients with chronic ischemic heart failure under modulation of myocardial contractility
- Modulation of cardiac contractility in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation
- P1491Cardiac contractility modulation in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation: 6 months of follow-up
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alfiya Safiullina, phd
National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- sub-Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2022
First Posted
September 22, 2022
Study Start
August 31, 2018
Primary Completion
December 10, 2019
Study Completion
March 30, 2022
Last Updated
September 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share