Should Preoperative Information Before Impacted Third Molar Extraction?
1 other identifier
interventional
86
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different preoperative information techniques (verbal, written, video with background audio, and silent video with subtitles) on patients' anxiety levels before and after third molar extraction. The secondary objective was to determine the superiority of the information methods evaluated over each other. We hypothesized that the information provided by video with or without background audio would decrease preoperative and postoperative anxiety levels more effectively than information provided by verbal and written methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2022
CompletedSeptember 21, 2022
September 1, 2022
2 months
September 9, 2022
September 17, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Evaluation of anxiety with Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory(STAI-S) between groups preoperatively and postoperatively
STAI-S is a 20-item scale that determines the current anxiety level of the patient with reliability and validity in Turkish. Widely used to assess anxiety, the STAI explores the transient state of anxiety, and patients report how they are feeling at the current time point. It is scored using a 4-level frequency scale ranging from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 20 to 80, higher scores indicates higher anxiety
2 minutes
Evaluation of anxiety with Dental Fear Survey(DFS) between groups preoperatively and postoperatively
DFS is which consists of 20-items is used to determine physiological responses to dental stimuli via a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5. Total scores change from 20 to 100 point. It collects the evaluation of dental anxiety under 3 headings. The first 2 questions assess avoidance of dentistry, questions 3-7 show physiological arousal, and questions 8-20 predict fear of certain situations
2 minutes
Evaluation of anxiety with Modified Dental Anxiety Scale(MDAS) between groups preoperatively and postoperatively
MDAS which is created by adding one question to the Corah Dental Anxiety Scale have 5-item questionnaire with 5-point Likert-type scale. Scale shows points between 5 and 25
1 minute
Evaluation of anxiety with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between groups preoperatively and postoperatively
VAS is a digital and verbal assessment scale used to measure anxiety. A closed-ended scale of 0-100 mm ("0" no anxiety, "100" maximum imaginable anxiety) was used in the study, and participants were asked to put a mark on the VAS scale, which they thought showed the degree of their current anxiety
1 minute
Study Arms (4)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALGroup 1: patients were given information via silent video with subtitle (5-minute)
Group 2
EXPERIMENTALGroup 2: patients were given information via video with background audio (5-minute 34-second)
Group 3
EXPERIMENTALGroup 3: patients were given written information brochure
Group 4
EXPERIMENTALGroup 4: patients were given information verbally
Interventions
STAI is one of the most frequently used scales in anxiety research, although it is not a specific scale for dental anxiety
DFS is a scale developed by Kleinknecht used to determine dental fear in different dimensions. This is a Likert-type scale with a score of 1-5. It has 20 items. It examines the level of fear in terms of dentist avoidance, somatic symptoms of fear, and fear of various applications in dentistry practice
MDAS was developed by Humphris et al. by adding a question related to injection. The scale consists of five-point Likert-type rating with five options. The scoring in this scale varies between 5 and 25
VAS is ideal for evaluating situations that cannot be measured using digital and oral information. In the present study, a scale comprising 100-mm closed-end line was used to measure the anxiety level. One end of the scale was labeled as "no anxiety" and the other end as "maximum anxiety imaginable
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who did not have pain
- Signs of infection related to the third molar were included
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score I and II
- The absence of any systemic disease and regular medication use
You may not qualify if:
- Patients have the presence of an existing psychiatric disorder, psychiatric disorders, anxiolytic or antidepressant drug treatment
- Patients who were pregnant or lactated
- Patients who couldn't understand or fill out questionnaires, had presence of visual or auditory deficits, refuse to watch the video or join the study, had incomplete data
- Patients who had a previous negative experience with dental treatment were excluded from the study, as it may cause higher anxiety levels
- Those who watched a video on the subject before were not included in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Yıldırım beyazıt University, Faculty of Dentistry
Ankara, 06790, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Muglali M, Komerik N. Factors related to patients' anxiety before and after oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 May;66(5):870-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.662.
PMID: 18423273BACKGROUNDLaskin DM, Priest JH, Alfaqih S, Carrico CK. Does Viewing a Third Molar Informed Consent Video Decrease Patients' Anxiety? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;76(12):2515-2517. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
PMID: 30193118BACKGROUNDSirin Y, Humphris G, Sencan S, Firat D. What is the most fearful intervention in ambulatory oral surgery? Analysis of an outpatient clinic. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;41(10):1284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
PMID: 22832662BACKGROUNDde Jongh A, Olff M, van Hoolwerff H, Aartman IH, Broekman B, Lindauer R, Boer F. Anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms following wisdom tooth removal. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Dec;46(12):1305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
PMID: 18954863BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
kevser sancak
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- oral and maxillofacial surgery, principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2022
First Posted
September 21, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
September 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09