NCT06244797

Brief Summary

After wisdom teeth are extracted, the patient may have some complaints in the post-operative period. Pain, swelling and edema are some of them. These inflammatory complications are important for patients and surgeons to reduce the risk of complications and ensure postoperative recovery and develop customized strategy. Many studies have been conducted in the literature to minimize these situations encountered after tooth extraction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 18, 2023

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 11, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2024

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 14, 2024

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 23, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 11, 2024

Results QC Date

May 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Impacted Third Molar Tooth, PRF

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Postoperative Facial Swelling (Sum of 3 Linear Distances, mm)

    Swelling was evaluated by measuring three linear facial distances: LC-M (lateral canthus to mandibular angle), T-CL (tragus to labial commissure), and T-P (tragus to soft tissue pogonion). The sum of these distances (in mm) was calculated for each participant preoperatively and on postoperative Days 2 and 7. Mean values are reported. Higher values indicate greater swelling. Time Frame: Postoperative Day 2 and Day 7 Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm) Measure Type: Mean Measure of Dispersion/Precision: Standard Deviation

    Postoperative day 2 and day 7

  • Maximum Interincisal Distance (Mouth Opening, mm)

    Trismus was assessed by measuring the maximum interincisal distance (mouth opening) with a calibrated ruler. Measurements were recorded on postoperative Days 2 and 7. Lower values indicate more restricted mouth opening.

    postoperative day 2 and day 7

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Soft Tissue Healing (Landry Index, 5-point Scale)

    Postoperative Day 2 and Day 7

  • Postoperative Pain (Visual Analog Scale, 0-10)

    6 hours after surgery and postoperative Days 1 through 7

  • Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (Majid Questionnaire, Total Score 0-42)

    Postoperative Day 4

  • Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (Majid Questionnaire Subscales; Days With Symptoms, 0-7)

    Postoperative Day 7

  • Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (Majid - Eating & Drinking; Days With Symptoms, 0-7)

    Postoperative Day 7

Study Arms (3)

CONTROL GROUP

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patient group in which no material is placed in the extraction socket after impacted tooth extraction. There will be 25 patients in this group.

Procedure: L-PRF and H-PRFProcedure: Impacted Tooth Removal

L-PRF (leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin):

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patient group in which L-PRF will be placed in the extraction socket after impacted tooth extraction. There will be 25 patients in this group. Device information to be used: Electromag M815P centrifuge device.

Procedure: L-PRF and H-PRFProcedure: Impacted Tooth Removal

H-PRF (horizontal-platelet rich fibrin)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patient group in which H-PRF will be placed in the extraction socket after impacted tooth extraction. There will be 25 patients in this group. Device information to be used: Electromag M815A2 centrifuge device.

Procedure: L-PRF and H-PRFProcedure: Impacted Tooth Removal

Interventions

Blood (10 ml) will be taken from the patient with the help of an intraket in the arm or hand of appropriate size and size. Then, the blood sample taken will be placed in the PRF device for centrifugation and the sample will be centrifuged. According to the type of PRF, the centrifuge settings will be changed.

CONTROL GROUPH-PRF (horizontal-platelet rich fibrin)L-PRF (leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin):

All patients will be operated on by the same surgeon using the same procedure in order to ensure standardization. Following the administration of 2% articaine with 1:200,000 adrenalin for the inferior alveolar and buccal nerve blocks, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be raised, and the tooth will be extracted. Following the extraction of the tooth, sterile saline irrigation will be used in the socket, and bleeding control measures will be taken.

CONTROL GROUPH-PRF (horizontal-platelet rich fibrin)L-PRF (leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin):

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Volunteer ASA I individuals between the ages of 18-40

You may not qualify if:

  • Those who are pregnant or lactating
  • Those receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug therapy
  • Those who received radiotherapy to the head and face area
  • Those who are allergic to local anesthetics and prescribed medications

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi

Tokat Province, Kaleardı Neighbourhood, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Majid OW. Submucosal dexamethasone injection improves quality of life measures after third molar surgery: a comparative study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Sep;69(9):2289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.037. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

    PMID: 21514710BACKGROUND
  • Landry RG, Turnbull RS, Howley T: Effectiveness of benzydamyne HCl in the treatment of periodontal post- surgical patients. Res Clin Forums. 1988, 10:105-18

    BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr.Esengul Sen
Organization
Dr.Lecturer

Study Officials

  • Esengül ŞEN

    Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assisstant Prof. DDS, Phd, Head of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2024

First Posted

February 6, 2024

Study Start

December 18, 2023

Primary Completion

March 1, 2024

Study Completion

May 14, 2024

Last Updated

January 23, 2026

Results First Posted

January 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations