Percutaneous Intervention Versus Observational Trial of Arterial Ductus in Low Weight Infants
PIVOTAL
2 other identifiers
interventional
240
1 country
24
Brief Summary
Patent Ductus Arteriosus is a developmental condition commonly observed among preterm infants. It is a condition where the opening between the two major blood vessels leading from the heart fail to close after birth. In the womb, the opening (ductus arteriosus) is the normal part of the circulatory system of the baby, but is expected to close at full term birth. If the opening is tiny, the condition can be self-limiting. If not, medications/surgery are options for treatment. There are two ways to treat patent ductus arteriosus - one is through closure of the opening with an FDA approved device called PICCOLO, the other is through supportive management (medications). No randomized controlled trials have been done previously to see if one of better than the other. Through our PIVOTAL study, the investigators aim to determine is one is indeed better than the other - if it is found that the percutaneous closure with PICCOLO is better, then it would immediately lead to a new standard of care. If not, then the investigators avoid an invasive costly procedure going forward.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedMarch 30, 2025
March 1, 2025
3 years
August 30, 2022
March 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of days free of ventilatory support requirement (ventilator-free days; VFDs)
Ventilator free days (VFDs) are defined as the number of days that a subject is alive and free from mechanical ventilatory support. VFDs are an established respiratory outcome measure in pediatric clinical trials, and are a strong predictor of short-term and longer-term oucomes, including length of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay, morbidities, and mortality.
30 days post-randomization
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Positive-pressure dependency or death
36 weeks post-menstrual age
Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension or death
36 weeks post-menstrual age
Total days on mechanical ventilation
4 months corrected age
Days requiring positive-pressure assisted breathing
Randomization through 4 months corrected age
Days on supplemental oxygen
Randomization through 4 months corrected age
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Determine whether neurodevelopment at 3-4 months CA is mediated by improved neurodevelopmental profiles at 34-36 weeks PMA.
34-36 weeks post-menstrual age and 3 - 4 months corrected age
Evaluation of effect modifiers on primary and secondary outcomes
Birth to 4 months of corrected age
Study Arms (2)
Primary Comparator
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventional groups that subject will be randomly assigned to include Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure (PPC) or Responsive Management. Those assigned to PPC will undergo active intervention to close a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (HSPDA) whereas those assigned to Responsive Management will be treated to manage the symptoms of the HSPDA and permit natural closure over time.
Secondary Intervention
OTHERSub-group of patients initially randomized to Responsive Management who may suffer a decline in health status that can be attributed to the presence of a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (HSPDA). These patients, upon meeting pre-specified clinical criteria, will undergo active treatment via Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure (PPC) as in the active comparator arm.
Interventions
Infants in this group will undergo catheter-based PPC closure ≤48 hours following randomization and within 7-days of qualifying ECHO. All participants assigned to PPC will receive the Amplatzer Piccolo™ Occluder which will be implanted within the duct (intraductal placement). The Piccolo™ occluder is approved by the US FDA for this purpose.
Interventional PDA-closure, including PPC or surgical ligation and post-randomization pharmacologic (NSAID or acetaminophen) (enteral or intravenous) PDA treatment, are not allowed unless secondary treatment thresholds (see below) are met. Healthcare decisions for Responsive Management will be made at the discretion of the treatment team, while the infant is carefully monitored for any decline in status that may be attributed to the presence of PDA, in which case, Secondary Intervention (described below) may be considered. Despite widespread acceptance of responsive PDA management, no consensus definition exists. The following Responsive Management interventions are permitted but not required per clinician discretion: 1) fluid restriction between 120-140 mL/kg/day; 2) diuretics (per local practice); 3) increases in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).
An echocardiogram, also known as "ECHO", is an ultrasound image of the heart. Echocardiography is a common test used for the diagnosis and management of cardiac diseases or conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- EPIs born between 22-weeks+0 days (220/7 wks) and 27-weeks+6 days (276/7 wks) gestation, inclusive
- Admitted to a study NICU
- Birth weight ≥700-grams
- Mechanically ventilated at time of consent and randomization
- HSPDA ("PDA Score" ≥6) noted on echocardiogram (ECHO)
- Randomization is able to be performed within 5 days of the qualifying ECHO and when infant is 7-32 days postnatal
You may not qualify if:
- Life-threatening congenital defects (including congenital heart disease such as aortic coarctation or pulmonary artery stenosis). PDA and small atrial/ventricular septal defects are permitted;
- Congenital lung abnormalities, (e.g. restrictive lung disease);
- Pharyngeal or airway anomalies (tracheal stenosis, choanal atresia);
- Treatment for acute abdominal process (e.g., necrotizing enterocolitis);
- Infants with planned surgery;
- Active infection requiring treatment;
- Chromosomal defects (e.g., Trisomy 18);
- Neuromuscular disorders;
- Infants whose parents have chosen to allow natural death (do not resuscitate order) or for whom limitation of intensive care treatment is being considered (e.g. severe intraventricular hemorrhage)
- Pulmonary hypertension (defined by ductal right to left shunting for \>33% of the cardiac cycle) in which early PDA closure may increase right ventricular afterload and compromise pulmonary and systemic blood flow;
- Evidence of cardiac thrombus that might interfere with device placement;
- PDA diameter larger than 4 mm at the narrowest portion (consistent with FDA-approved instructions for Piccolo™ device use).
- PDA length smaller than 3 mm (consistent with FDA-approved instructions for Piccolo™ device use).
- \. Parents or legal guardian do not speak English or Spanish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nationwide Children's Hospitallead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- Abbottcollaborator
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
- University of Bristolcollaborator
- Dartmouth Collegecollaborator
- University of Iowacollaborator
- Emory Universitycollaborator
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Centercollaborator
- Children's Hospital Los Angelescollaborator
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)collaborator
Study Sites (24)
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Lucille Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
UC Davis Children's Hospital
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital
Hollywood, Florida, 33021, United States
Orlando Health
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
C.S. Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
University of Minnesota, Masonic Children's Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York-Presbyterian
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center
Memphis, Tennessee, 38103, United States
Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Medical City Children's Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States
UT Southwestern Children's Medical Center of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
Texas Children's
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Seattle Children's
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Children's Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (28)
Benitz WE; Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3730. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
PMID: 26672023BACKGROUNDBenitz WE. Patent ductus arteriosus: to treat or not to treat? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Mar;97(2):F80-2. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300381. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
PMID: 22174019BACKGROUNDLiebowitz M, Katheria A, Sauberan J, Singh J, Nelson K, Hassinger DC, Aucott SW, Kaempf J, Kimball A, Fernandez E, Carey WA, Perez J, Serize A, Wickremasinghe A, Dong L, Derrick M, Wolf IS, Heuchan AM, Sankar M, Bulbul A, Clyman RI; PDA-TOLERATE (PDA: TOLEave it alone or Respond And Treat Early) Trial Investigators. Lack of Equipoise in the PDA-TOLERATE Trial: A Comparison of Eligible Infants Enrolled in the Trial and Those Treated Outside the Trial. J Pediatr. 2019 Oct;213:222-226.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.05.049. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
PMID: 31255386BACKGROUNDDonovan JL, Rooshenas L, Jepson M, Elliott D, Wade J, Avery K, Mills N, Wilson C, Paramasivan S, Blazeby JM. Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Trials. 2016 Jun 8;17(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1391-4.
PMID: 27278130BACKGROUNDWilson C, Rooshenas L, Paramasivan S, Elliott D, Jepson M, Strong S, Birtle A, Beard DJ, Halliday A, Hamdy FC, Lewis R, Metcalfe C, Rogers CA, Stein RC, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework. Trials. 2018 Jan 19;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2413-6.
PMID: 29351790BACKGROUNDDonovan JL, Lane JA, Peters TJ, Brindle L, Salter E, Gillatt D, Powell P, Bollina P, Neal DE, Hamdy FC; ProtecT Study Group. Development of a complex intervention improved randomization and informed consent in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;62(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
PMID: 18619811BACKGROUNDHamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
PMID: 27626136BACKGROUNDRooshenas L, Scott LJ, Blazeby JM, Rogers CA, Tilling KM, Husbands S, Conefrey C, Mills N, Stein RC, Metcalfe C, Carr AJ, Beard DJ, Davis T, Paramasivan S, Jepson M, Avery K, Elliott D, Wilson C, Donovan JL; By-Band-Sleeve study group; CSAW study group; HAND-1 study group; Optima prelim study group; Romio feasibility study group. The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention supported five randomized trials to recruit to target: a mixed-methods evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;106:108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
PMID: 30339938BACKGROUNDDonovan JL, Paramasivan S, de Salis I, Toerien M. Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2014 Jan 6;15:5. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-5.
PMID: 24393291BACKGROUNDRooshenas L, Elliott D, Wade J, Jepson M, Paramasivan S, Strong S, Wilson C, Beard D, Blazeby JM, Birtle A, Halliday A, Rogers CA, Stein R, Donovan JL; ACST-2 study group; By-Band-Sleeve study group; Chemorad study group; CSAW study group; Optima prelim study group; POUT study group. Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians' Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials. PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002147. eCollection 2016 Oct.
PMID: 27755555BACKGROUNDMills N, Donovan JL, Wade J, Hamdy FC, Neal DE, Lane JA. Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):1127-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.017. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
PMID: 21477994BACKGROUNDJepson M, Elliott D, Conefrey C, Wade J, Rooshenas L, Wilson C, Beard D, Blazeby JM, Birtle A, Halliday A, Stein R, Donovan JL; CSAW study group; Chemorad study group; POUT study group; ACST-2 study group; OPTIMA prelim study group. An observational study showed that explaining randomization using gambling-related metaphors and computer-agency descriptions impeded randomized clinical trial recruitment. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;99:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
PMID: 29505860BACKGROUNDDonovan JL, de Salis I, Toerien M, Paramasivan S, Hamdy FC, Blazeby JM. The intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):912-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 May 5.
PMID: 24811157BACKGROUNDRooshenas L, Paramasivan S, Jepson M, Donovan JL. Intensive Triangulation of Qualitative Research and Quantitative Data to Improve Recruitment to Randomized Trials: The QuinteT Approach. Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):672-679. doi: 10.1177/1049732319828693. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
PMID: 30791819BACKGROUNDCoyne IT. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs. 1997 Sep;26(3):623-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x.
PMID: 9378886BACKGROUNDGlaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Vol. ed.: Aldine; 1967.
BACKGROUNDUS Food and Drug Administration. Use of electronic informed consent, questions and answers: Guidance for institutional review boards, investigators, and sponsors. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration. 2016.
BACKGROUNDLawrence CE, Dunkel L, McEver M, Israel T, Taylor R, Chiriboga G, Goins KV, Rahn EJ, Mudano AS, Roberson ED, Chambless C, Wadley VG, Danila MI, Fischer MA, Joosten Y, Saag KG, Allison JJ, Lemon SC, Harris PA. A REDCap-based model for electronic consent (eConsent): Moving toward a more personalized consent. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Apr 3;4(4):345-353. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.30.
PMID: 33244416BACKGROUNDParamasivan S, Strong S, Wilson C, Campbell B, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. A simple technique to identify key recruitment issues in randomised controlled trials: Q-QAT - Quanti-Qualitative Appointment Timing. Trials. 2015 Mar 11;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0617-1.
PMID: 25873096BACKGROUNDWatterberg KL, Walsh MC, Li L, Chawla S, D'Angio CT, Goldberg RN, Hintz SR, Laughon MM, Yoder BA, Kennedy KA, McDavid GE, Backstrom-Lacy C, Das A, Crawford MM, Keszler M, Sokol GM, Poindexter BB, Ambalavanan N, Hibbs AM, Truog WE, Schmidt B, Wyckoff MH, Khan AM, Garg M, Chess PR, Reynolds AM, Moallem M, Bell EF, Meyer LR, Patel RM, Van Meurs KP, Cotten CM, McGowan EC, Hines AC, Merhar S, Peralta-Carcelen M, Wilson-Costello DE, Kilbride HW, DeMauro SB, Heyne RJ, Mosquera RA, Natarajan G, Purdy IB, Lowe JR, Maitre NL, Harmon HM, Hogden LA, Adams-Chapman I, Winter S, Malcolm WF, Higgins RD; Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Hydrocortisone to Improve Survival without Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1121-1131. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114897.
PMID: 35320643BACKGROUNDGordon Lan KK, DeMets DL. Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika. 1983;70(3):659-663.
BACKGROUNDO'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979 Sep;35(3):549-56.
PMID: 497341BACKGROUNDL Orton J, McGinley JL, Fox LM, Spittle AJ. Challenges of neurodevelopmental follow-up for extremely preterm infants at two years. Early Hum Dev. 2015 Dec;91(12):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
PMID: 26513630BACKGROUNDBaron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
PMID: 3806354BACKGROUNDWasserstein RL, Schirm AL, Lazar NA. Moving to a world beyond "p< 0.05". In. Vol 73: Taylor & Francis; 2019:1-19.
BACKGROUNDSzklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics. Vol. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2014.
BACKGROUNDJensen EA, DeMauro SB, Kornhauser M, Aghai ZH, Greenspan JS, Dysart KC. Effects of Multiple Ventilation Courses and Duration of Mechanical Ventilation on Respiratory Outcomes in Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Nov;169(11):1011-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2401.
PMID: 26414549BACKGROUNDVliegenthart RJS, van Kaam AH, Aarnoudse-Moens CSH, van Wassenaer AG, Onland W. Duration of mechanical ventilation and neurodevelopment in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Nov;104(6):F631-F635. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315993. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
PMID: 30894396BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Pediatrics, Departments of Neonatology and Cardiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2022
First Posted
September 21, 2022
Study Start
February 21, 2023
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
March 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share