The U.S. PDA Registry
The United States Patent Ductus Arteriosus Registry
1 other identifier
observational
5,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the continued safety and efficacy in a real-world setting of transcatheter device closure of the PDA in premature infants less than 2kg in weight at the time of device implant using the Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder device and other devices performed in the USA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2031
December 20, 2019
December 1, 2019
10 years
December 16, 2019
December 17, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Vascular Access Complications (Safety)
Access vessel complications include femoral arterial or femoral/jugular venous complications noted during the procedure, immediately after the procedure or delayed (\>24 hours). They range from bleeding from access sites, arterial or venous thrombosis with or without the need for treatment to loss of limb secondary to arterial occlusion.
6 months
Valvular Injury (Safety)
Valvular injury includes damage to the tricuspid valve or other cardiac valve resulting in immediate post-procedural valvular dysfunction.
6 months
Device Embolization (Safety)
Device embolization includes malposition of the device either during or after the procedure or delayed (\>24 hours). The outcome of device embolization ranges from observation, transcatheter retrieval at time of procedure or at a separate time, surgical retrieval, other end organ damage, to mortality.
6 months
Pulmonary or Aortic Vessel Stenosis (Safety)
Adjacent vessel stenosis includes a narrowing of the aorta or the left pulmonary artery directly as a consequence of device implantation for PDA closure. Vessel stenosis could happen either during or after the procedure or delayed (\>24 hours). The outcome of vessel stenosis ranges from no intervention needed to repeated transcatheter and surgical therapies.
6 months
Rate of Effective PDA Closure (Effectiveness)
The effectiveness endpoint is the rate of effective closure of the PDA using a transcatheter device within six months post procedure. If more than one attempt is required, or multiple devices are required during the same procedure, it is still considered effective if there is Grade 0 or Grade 1 shunt, as defined below, at follow-up by transthoracic echocardiography or if a second procedure is not required following the initial attempt. If there is device embolization, adjacent vessel stenosis that required retrieval of the device and replacement during the same procedure with less than Grade 1 shunt during follow-up, it is still considered effective. Conversely, if an AE is noted after the procedure that requires a second procedure for treatment that results in greater than Grade 1 shunt, then the procedure is considered not effective, even if the initial attempt was effective. See protocol for PDA shunt definitions.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Significant obstruction of the left pulmonary artery
6 months
Significant obstruction of the aorta
6 months
Study Arms (1)
Registry Group
All participants will have the same data collected at the same time points.
Interventions
Device utilized for closure of PDA, study is to help assure continued safety and effectiveness of FDA approved Amplatzer Piccolo Occluder device as well as other devices used off label for PDA closure in premature infants less than 2 kg at the time of device implant.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population is patients with diagnosis of PDA with clinical indication for transcatheter PDA closure, and weigh less than 2 kg at the time of device implant.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of PDA.
- Clinical indication for transcatheter PDA closure (discretion of the physician).
- Weight \<2 kg at the time of device implant.
You may not qualify if:
- Weight \<700 gm or greater than or equal to 2 kg at the time of device implant.
- Age \< 3 days at the time of device implant.
- Pre-existing coarctation of the aorta.
- Pre-existing left pulmonary artery stenosis.
- Cardiac output that is dependent on right to left shunt through the PDA due to pulmonary hypertension.
- Intracardiac thrombus that interferes with device implant.
- Active infection requiring treatment at the time of impant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Le Bonheur Children's Hospitallead
- Abbottcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
LeBonheur Children's Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38103, United States
Related Publications (19)
Tashiro J, Perez EA, Sola JE. Reduced Hospital Mortality With Surgical Ligation of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Premature, Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Propensity Score-matched Outcome Study. Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):608-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001228.
PMID: 25822689RESULTSchneider DJ. The patent ductus arteriosus in term infants, children, and adults. Semin Perinatol. 2012 Apr;36(2):146-53. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.09.025.
PMID: 22414886RESULTMahoney LT, Coryell KG, Lauer RM. The newborn transitional circulation: a two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Sep;6(3):623-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80123-6.
PMID: 4031274RESULTPhilip R, Waller BR 3rd, Agrawal V, Wright D, Arevalo A, Zurakowski D, Sathanandam S. Morphologic characterization of the patent ductus arteriosus in the premature infant and the choice of transcatheter occlusion device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 1;87(2):310-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26287. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
PMID: 26525611RESULTKrichenko A, Benson LN, Burrows P, Moes CA, McLaughlin P, Freedom RM. Angiographic classification of the isolated, persistently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Apr 1;63(12):877-80. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90064-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 2929450RESULTPass RH. Amplatzer Duct Occluder device: a new technology for the closure of the moderate-to-large-sized patent ductus arteriosus. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006 May;3(3):291-6. doi: 10.1586/17434440.3.3.291.
PMID: 16681450RESULTMoore JW, Levi DS, Moore SD, Schneider DJ, Berdjis F. Interventional treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in 2004. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Jan;64(1):91-101. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20243.
PMID: 15619281RESULTPerlo f, Joseph K.The Clinical Recognition of Congenital Heart Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders. Print.
RESULTGross RE, Hubbard JP. Landmark article Feb 25, 1939: Surgical ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus. Report of first successful case. By Robert E. Gross and John P. Hubbard. JAMA. 1984 Mar 2;251(9):1201-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.251.9.1201. No abstract available.
PMID: 6363741RESULTKabra NS, Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Doyle LW, Papile L, Fanaroff A; Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms Investigators. Neurosensory impairment after surgical closure of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low birth weight infants: results from the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms. J Pediatr. 2007 Mar;150(3):229-34, 234.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.11.039.
PMID: 17307535RESULTChorne N, Leonard C, Piecuch R, Clyman RI. Patent ductus arteriosus and its treatment as risk factors for neonatal and neurodevelopmental morbidity. Pediatrics. 2007 Jun;119(6):1165-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3124.
PMID: 17545385RESULTTeixeira LS, Shivananda SP, Stephens D, Van Arsdell G, McNamara PJ. Postoperative cardiorespiratory instability following ligation of the preterm ductus arteriosus is related to early need for intervention. J Perinatol. 2008 Dec;28(12):803-10. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.101. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
PMID: 18615091RESULTPorstmann W, Wierny L, Warnke H, Gerstberger G, Romaniuk PA. Catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus. 62 cases treated without thoracotomy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1971 Aug;9(2):203-18. No abstract available.
PMID: 4938290RESULTWeisz DE, McNamara PJ. Patent ductus arteriosus ligation and adverse outcomes: causality or bias? J Clin Neonatol. 2014 Apr;3(2):67-75. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.134670.
PMID: 25024972RESULTGruenstein DH, Ebeid M, Radtke W, Moore P, Holzer R, Justino H. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using the AMPLATZER duct occluder II (ADO II). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):1118-1128. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26968. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
PMID: 28258658RESULTKenny D, Morgan GJ, Bentham JR, Wilson N, Martin R, Tometzki A, Oslizlok P, Walsh KP. Early clinical experience with a modified Amplatzer ductal occluder for transcatheter arterial duct occlusion in infants and small children. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;82(4):534-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24522. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
PMID: 22718329RESULTSungur M, Karakurt C, Ozbarlas N, Baspinar O. Closure of patent ductus arteriosus in children, small infants, and premature babies with Amplatzer duct occluder II additional sizes: multicenter study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug 1;82(2):245-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24905. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
PMID: 23460349RESULTBruckheimer E, Godfrey M, Dagan T, Levinzon M, Amir G, Birk E. The Amplatzer Duct Occluder II Additional Sizes device for transcatheter PDA closure: initial experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):1097-101. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25445. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
PMID: 24532416RESULTBaspinar O, Sahin DA, Sulu A, Irdem A, Gokaslan G, Sivasli E, Kilinc M. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in under 6 kg and premature infants. J Interv Cardiol. 2015 Apr;28(2):180-9. doi: 10.1111/joic.12196. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
PMID: 25832591RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shyam Sathanandam, MD
National Principal Investigator
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee. Director of Cath Lab, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2019
First Posted
December 20, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2031
Last Updated
December 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data will become available when it is collected and added to the national database. It will be available for 12 years.
- Access Criteria
- Investigators will submit proposal to request data to the Proposal Review Committee. If approved, de-identified data will be shared.
A Data Management Plan (DMP) will describe procedures used for data review, database cleaning, and issuing and resolving data queries. If appropriate, the DMP may be updated throughout the clinical investigation duration. All revisions will be tracked and document controlled. Subject data will be captured in a validated electronic data capture (EDC) system. Only authorized site personnel will be permitted to enter the CRF data through the EDC system. An electronic audit trail will be used to track any subsequent changes of the entered data.