NCT05543694

Brief Summary

To estimate the dose of bupivacaine required to achieve initial effective comfort in 90% of patients (ED90) via the epidural (DPE or EPL) technique in women undergoing labor after receiving a lidocaine "test dose"

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 14, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 14, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Dural puncture epiduralNeuraxial AnalgesiaBupivacaineLocal Anesthetic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Verbal Numerical Pain Rating Score

    (0-10, with higher scores meaning more pain); goal with analgesia is \< 3/10

    30 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique

EXPERIMENTAL

Laboring women receiving the Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) Technique, after a lidocaine "test dose", with dose of Bupivacaine 0.25% diluted to 20 mL with isotonic sterile 0.9% saline. The first subject in the DPE group will receive an initial dose of bupivacaine 25 mg, with an endpoint being the achievement of an NRS \< 3 at 30 min. Subsequent patients are administered bupivacaine doses determined by the response of the previous subject, as per the biased coin method. The subsequent up and down interval doses are bupivacaine 2.5 mg (1 mL) increments, with an anticipated dose range from 20 mg to 40 mg.

Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Epidural Technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Laboring women receiving the Conventional Epidural Technique (EPL), after receiving a lidocaine "test dose" with dose of Bupivacaine 0.25% diluted to 20 mL with isotonic sterile 0.9% saline. The first subject in the EPL group will receive an initial dose of bupivacaine 25 mg, with an endpoint being the achievement of an NRS \< 3 at 30 min. Subsequent patients are administered bupivacaine doses determined by the response of the previous subject, as per the biased coin method. The subsequent up and down interval doses are bupivacaine 2.5 mg (1 mL) increments, with an anticipated dose range from 20 mg to 40 mg.

Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Interventions

Subjects will receive a dose of bupivacaine as described in the arm section of this trial

Dural Puncture Epidural TechniqueEpidural Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Parturient with no major co-morbidities
  • Singleton, vertex gestation at term (37-42 weeks)
  • Less than or equal to 5 cm dilation
  • Desire to receive epidural labor analgesia
  • Numerical Rating Scale greater or equal to 5 (NRS 0-10, where 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst pain imaginable), at time of epidural labor analgesia request.

You may not qualify if:

  • Current or historical evidence of clinically significant disease or condition, including diseases of pregnancy (i.e preeclampsia, gestational diabetes)
  • Any contraindication to the administration of an epidural technique
  • History of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to an amide local anesthetic agent
  • Current or historical evidence of a disease which may result in the risk of a cesarean delivery (i.e. history of uterine rupture). NB: Exception-trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) will be eligible.
  • Evidence of anticipated fetal anomalies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Ngan Kee WD, Ng FF, Khaw KS, Lee A, Gin T. Determination and comparison of graded dose-response curves for epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in laboring nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):445-53. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bdf9da.

    PMID: 20613484BACKGROUND
  • Benhamou D, Ghosh C, Mercier FJ. A randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor. Anesthesiology. 2003 Dec;99(6):1383-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200312000-00022.

    PMID: 14639153BACKGROUND
  • Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, Elterman KG, Cappiello EC, Robinson JN, Tsen LC. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.

    PMID: 28067707BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Labor PainAgnosia

Interventions

Bupivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Central Study Contacts

Lawrence C Tsen, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The biased-coin allocation after each successful response will be implemented by flipping a virtual biased coin (10% vs. 90% probability of randomizing the next patient to the lower vs. same dose than received by the last patient with the same epidural technique) using R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Care Provider (Clinical Anesthesiologist) will administer the identified dose, then summon blinded observer.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized Controlled Trial Using Biased Coin Design to Determine Effective Dose for 90% (ED90) of Subjects
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Anesthesia

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2022

First Posted

September 16, 2022

Study Start

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion

October 1, 2024

Study Completion

October 1, 2024

Last Updated

February 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations