NCT05543031

Brief Summary

The aim was to observe the effect of the music integrated phonological awareness program on preschool cochlear implant users and to compare the phonological awareness skills of the study group with the control group before and after the online training.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 18, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 2, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 16, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2022

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

August 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 13, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Phonological awareness trainingmusiccochlear implanttelerehabilitationmismatch negativity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from Baseline in the phonological awareness skills at 3 Months

    The Early Childhood Phonological Awareness Scale (PASECP) was used to measure sound awareness and sound discrimination skills of preschool children whose language age is between 60-72 months. The test has 8 sub-dimensions. There are 8 test items in the first sub-dimension and 10 test items in the other sub-dimensions, with a total of 78 test items. If the answers given by the children to the scale items are correct (1), if incorrect (0), they are coded into the answer key. The test is administered to children individually. The application time for each child takes approximately 15 minutes. High scores of the child indicate that his/her phonological awareness is good.

    baseline and 3 months

  • Change from Electrophysiological at 3 Months

    Mismatch Negativity (MMN) was used to evaluate the central auditory system. Neuron-Spectrum-5 (4/EPM) (Neurosoft, Ivanoco, Russia) was used for the electrophysiological recordings of the study group. Speech stimuli were used as stimuli. Amplitude and latency changes were observed in the Mismatch Negativity test before and after the training. The increase in amplitudes and shortening of latencies after training indicate that the central auditory system has developed.

    baseline and 3 months

  • Change from baseline in the spectral discrimination ability at 3 Months

    Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT) was used to assess the spectral discrimination ability of the study group. The test was performed using SMRT software. Waveform broadband noise with spectral-temporal modulation was used. In each trial, three ripple sounds were presented. Two stimuli were reference signals with an intensity of 20 ripple/octave (rpo) and another stimulus was a target signal with a lower rpo intensity. The initial intensity of the target signal was 0.5 rpo and was replaced by a step size of 0.2 rpo. Adaptive running terminated after ten reverses.Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test was calculated over the last six reversals. Three runs were completed for each child, and the final threshold was determined by averaging the three runs. Having a low rpo value was an indication of good spectral resolution of the children.

    baseline and 3 months

Study Arms (2)

Study group

EXPERIMENTAL

There are 9 (35,8%) female and 14 (64,2%) male preschool cochlear implant users in the study group. Children ranging in age from 5 to 7 who also have 5-6 years old language skills.

Other: Music-Integrated Phonological Awareness training programDiagnostic Test: Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT)Diagnostic Test: The Phonological Awareness Scale of Early Childhood Period (PASECP)Diagnostic Test: Mismatch Negativity TestDiagnostic Test: Early Language Development (TELD-3)

Control group

EXPERIMENTAL

There are 9 (35.8%) female and 14 (64,2%) male preschool children with normal hearing in the control group. Children ranging in age from 5 to 6 who also have age-appropriate language skills.

Diagnostic Test: The Phonological Awareness Scale of Early Childhood Period (PASECP)Diagnostic Test: Early Language Development (TELD-3)

Interventions

We would like to observe the effect of the music integrated phonological awareness program on preschool cochlear implant users and to compare the phonological awareness skills of the study group with the control group before and after the online training. The program is prepared as 10 lessons. Participants were guided through online training for 5 weeks, with 20-minute sessions conducted weekly. The training was carried out via Zoom, a free virtual interview program. Each family had a computer.

Study group

Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT) was used to assess the spectral discrimination ability of the study group.Speech stimuli were presented at a calibrated presentation level of 60 dB SPL in a quiet room. The child was positioned at 0° azimuth and 1-meter from the loudspeaker.

Study group

The Phonological Awareness Scale of Early Childhood Period (PASECP) was used to measure the sound awareness and sound discrimination skills of study group pre-post training. The test has 8 sub-dimensions.

Control groupStudy group

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) was used to evaluate the central auditory system.The test was used for electrophysiological recordings of the study group.The standard stimulus presented as /ba/ (%80), and the rare stimulus presented as /da/ (%20) frequency. The onset (rise) and offset (fall) times of the stimuli are 10 ms, and the plateau time is 50 ms. The interval between stimuli for both responses was 1.1 ms. A 0.1-30 Hz filter was applied. The speech stimuli intensity was 70 dB SPL. Speech stimuli were presented at a 1-meter distance from the participant, with speakers placed at an angle of 0°.

Study group

Test of Early Language Development (TELD-3) measured children's receptive and expressive language skills both group for inclusion criteria.

Control groupStudy group

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • For children with hearing loss
  • Bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss
  • Having unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants,
  • Having a chronological age in the range of 5-7 years,
  • Not having started primary school.
  • Using the cochlear implant and regularly
  • To receive regular training in the auditory rehabilitation center
  • For children with normal hearing:
  • To have normal hearing,
  • To have receptive and expressive language skills compatible with the chronological age in the language test to be performed.
  • Not starting primary school

You may not qualify if:

  • In case of not having any without being accepted for control and study,
  • Having additional disability
  • Using drugs affecting the auditory system

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Istanbul, 34098, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)

Location

Uskudar University

Istanbul, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • Carroll JM, Snowling MJ, Hulme C, Stevenson J. The development of phonological awareness in preschool children. Dev Psychol. 2003 Sep;39(5):913-23. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.5.913.

    PMID: 12952403BACKGROUND
  • Ching TY, Cupples L. Phonological Awareness at 5 years of age in Children who use Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants. Perspect Hear Hear Disord Child. 2015 Sep;25(2):48-59. doi: 10.1044/hhdc25.2.48.

    PMID: 26929789BACKGROUND
  • Ching TY, Dillon H, Katsch R, Byrne D. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear. 2001 Jun;22(3):212-24. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200106000-00005.

    PMID: 11409857BACKGROUND
  • Soleymani Z, Mahmoodabadi N, Nouri MM. Language skills and phonological awareness in children with cochlear implants and normal hearing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;83:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

    PMID: 26968046BACKGROUND
  • Christiner M, Reiterer SM. Early Influence of Musical Abilities and Working Memory on Speech Imitation Abilities: Study with Pre-School Children. Brain Sci. 2018 Sep 1;8(9):169. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8090169.

  • Anvari SH, Trainor LJ, Woodside J, Levy BA. Relations among musical skills, phonological processing, and early reading ability in preschool children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Oct;83(2):111-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00124-8.

  • Choi JE, Won JH, Kim CH, Cho YS, Hong SH, Moon IJ. Relationship between spectrotemporal modulation detection and music perception in normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 15;8(1):800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17350-w.

  • Engstrom E, Kallioinen P, Nakeva von Mentzer C, Lindgren M, Sahlen B, Lyxell B, Ors M, Uhlen I. Auditory event-related potentials and mismatch negativity in children with hearing loss using hearing aids or cochlear implants - A three-year follow-up study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jan;140:110519. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110519. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

  • DiNino M, Arenberg JG. Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518770959. doi: 10.1177/2331216518770959.

  • Fernandes NM, Gil D, Azevedo MF. Mismatch Negativity in Children with Cochlear Implant. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jul;23(3):e292-e298. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688967. Epub 2019 May 28.

  • Ferreira DA, Bueno CD, de Costa SS, Sleifer P. Mismatch Negativity in Children: Reference Values. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Apr;23(2):142-146. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667313. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

  • Gifford RH, Noble JH, Camarata SM, Sunderhaus LW, Dwyer RT, Dawant BM, Dietrich MS, Labadie RF. The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518771176. doi: 10.1177/2331216518771176.

  • Jeddi Z, Lotfi Y, Moossavi A, Bakhshi E, Hashemi SB. Correlation between Auditory Spectral Resolution and Speech Perception in Children with Cochlear Implants. Iran J Med Sci. 2019 Sep;44(5):382-389. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2019.44967.

  • Jing L, Vermeire K, Mangino A, Reuterskiold C. Rhyme Awareness in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Cochlear Implants: An Exploratory Study. Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 12;10:2072. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02072. eCollection 2019.

  • Kraus N, Hornickel J, Strait DL, Slater J, Thompson E. Engagement in community music classes sparks neuroplasticity and language development in children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 16;5:1403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01403. eCollection 2014.

  • Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Martinez AS, Eisenberg LS. Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear. 2018 Jan/Feb;39(1):60-68. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000463.

  • Lee SAS, Hall B, Sancibrian S. Feasibility of a Supplemental Phonological Awareness Intervention via Telepractice for Children with Hearing Loss: A Preliminary Study. Int J Telerehabil. 2017 Jun 29;9(1):23-38. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6216. eCollection 2017 Spring.

  • Linnavalli T, Putkinen V, Huotilainen M, Tervaniemi M. Phoneme processing skills are reflected in children's MMN responses. Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 1;101:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 12.

  • Linnavalli T, Putkinen V, Lipsanen J, Huotilainen M, Tervaniemi M. Music playschool enhances children's linguistic skills. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 8;8(1):8767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27126-5.

  • Naatanen R, Petersen B, Torppa R, Lonka E, Vuust P. The MMN as a viable and objective marker of auditory development in CI users. Hear Res. 2017 Sep;353:57-75. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

  • Ni G, Zheng Q, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Yue T, Han S, Liu H, Ming D. Objective electroencephalography-based assessment for auditory rehabilitation of pediatric cochlear implant users. Hear Res. 2021 May;404:108211. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108211. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

  • Patscheke H, Dege F, Schwarzer G. The Effects of Training in Music and Phonological Skills on Phonological Awareness in 4- to 6-Year-Old Children of Immigrant Families. Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 21;7:1647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01647. eCollection 2016.

  • Scott JA, Goldberg H, Connor CM, Lederberg AR. Schooling Effects on Early Literacy Skills of Young Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children. Am Ann Deaf. 2019;163(5):596-618. doi: 10.1353/aad.2019.0005.

  • Soleimanifar S, Jafari Z, Motasaddi Zarandy M, Asadi H, Haghani H. Relationship between Intelligence Quotient and Musical Ability in Children with Cochlear Implantation. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;28(88):345-352.

  • Torppa R, Faulkner A, Laasonen M, Lipsanen J, Sammler D. Links of Prosodic Stress Perception and Musical Activities to Language Skills of Children With Cochlear Implants and Normal Hearing. Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):395-410. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000763.

  • Wang Y, Liu L, Zhang Y, Wei C, Xin T, He Q, Hou X, Liu Y. The Neural Processing of Vocal Emotion After Hearing Reconstruction in Prelingual Deaf Children: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Brain Imaging Study. Front Neurosci. 2021 Jul 28;15:705741. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.705741. eCollection 2021.

  • Webb MY, Lederberg AR. Measuring phonological awareness in deaf and hard-of-hearing children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Feb;57(1):131-42. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0106).

  • Won JH, Clinard CG, Kwon S, Dasika VK, Nie K, Drennan WR, Tremblay KL, Rubinstein JT. Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;12(3):375-93. doi: 10.1007/s10162-011-0257-4. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

Related Links

Study Officials

  • BĂ¼ÅŸra Yılanlı, Msc

    Uskudar University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
no masking
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study was designed to determine the benefit of music integrated phonological awareness programs for children using cochlear implants. In addition, the phonological skills and language skills of children using cochlear implants and children with normal hearing were compared in the pre and post-training results.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2022

First Posted

September 16, 2022

Study Start

March 18, 2021

Primary Completion

June 2, 2021

Study Completion

July 16, 2021

Last Updated

September 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The IPD available upon reasonable request to the other authors

Available IPD Datasets

Study Protocol Access
Study Protocol Access

Locations