NCT05541679

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate the superiority of chronic left bundle branch area pacing compared to traditional right ventricular (RV) septal pacing in patients with high-grade conduction disease after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this investigator initiated, multicenter, prospective, double-blinded, crossover study, chronic left bundle branch area pacing will be compared to chronic right ventricular septal pacing using echocardiographic measures of left ventricular systolic function in patients with a high cumulative ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 28, 2022

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in global longitudinal strain (GLS%)

    Primary efficacy outcome

    9 months

  • Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%)

    Primary efficacy outcome

    9 months

  • Composite of left bundle branch area pacing lead septal myocardial or coronary artery perforation, lead dislodgment, and repeat procedures related to left bundle branch area lead implantation

    Primary safety endpoint

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Adverse events related to device function

    18 months

  • Quality of life measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHQ)

    9 months

  • Functional capacity measured using the New York Heart Association functional classification (NYHA)

    9 months

  • Six minute walk test score

    9 months

  • Hospitalizations for heart failure

    18 months

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Right ventricular septal pacing followed by left bundle branch area pacing

Group B

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Left bundle branch area pacing followed by right ventricular septal pacing

Interventions

All patients will undergo implantation of right ventricular septal lead, left bundle branch area lead, and atrial lead in the absence of permanent atrial fibrillation with a CRT-pacing generator. Patients will be randomized to pacing protocols based on group assignment and crossover during the study.

Group A

All patients will undergo implantation of right ventricular septal lead, left bundle branch area lead, and atrial lead in the absence of permanent atrial fibrillation with a CRT-pacing generator. Patients will be randomized to pacing protocols based on group assignment and crossover during the study.

Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject has at least one of these conduction disturbances:
  • Symptomatic (or hemodynamically significant) bradycardia or symptomatic persistent atrioventricular block including first-degree and Mobitz I (Wenckebach) or Mobitz type II atrioventricular bock
  • High-grade atrioventricular block
  • Third-degree atrioventricular block
  • Subject has undergone TAVR (any valve system) in the last four weeks
  • Subject is receiving a first-time pacemaker implant
  • Subject's most recent documented ejection fraction (by any method) within the past 90 days prior to study enrollment is \> 50% (≥45% if visually estimated at the time of enrollment)
  • Subject is a male or female at least 18 years old at the time of consent
  • Subject is able to receive a left sided pectoral implant

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has ever had a previous or has an existing implantable pulse generator (IPG), implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) or biventricular (BiV) implant
  • Subject has more than mild para-valvular regurgitation following TAVR implantation.
  • Subject has LVEF \< 45% if visually estimated at the time of enrollment
  • Subject is indicated for a biventricular pacing device (CRT-P or CRT-D).
  • Subject is enrolled in a concurrent study that may confound the results of this study
  • Subject has a mechanical heart valve
  • Subject is pregnant, or of childbearing potential and not on a reliable form of birth control
  • Subject status post heart transplant
  • Subject life expectancy less than 2 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

Overland Park, Kansas, 66211, United States

Location

Valley Health System

Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450, United States

Location

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Lankenau Medical Center

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Liskov S, Olleik F, Jarrett H, Abramson S, Kowey P, Schaller RD, Vijayaraman P, Habibi M, Bansal S, Heimann M, Cox S, Keramati AR. Comparing Left Bundle Branch Area vs Right-Ventricular Septal Pacing in High-Degree Conduction Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Randomized Trial Study Protocol. CJC Open. 2024 May 18;6(9):1058-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.05.006. eCollection 2024 Sep.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aortic Valve DiseaseHeart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow Obstruction

Study Officials

  • Ali Keramati, MD

    Lankenau Heart Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2022

First Posted

September 15, 2022

Study Start

December 28, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

December 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Locations