Immediate vs. On-demand Endoscopic Necrosectomy in Infected Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis
Immediate Endoscopic Necrosectomy vs. On-demand Necroectomy in Infected Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common diagnoses made in gastroenterology wards worldwide which causes a great deal of pain and expense along with fatal complications. Approximately, 10-20% of patients progress to necrotizing pancreatitis that result in significant morbidity and mortality. Initial conservative management may be feasible in necrotizing pancreatitis, however the majority of patients with infected necrosis or persistent symptoms will eventually require a drainage procedure. Drainage procedures for necrotizing pancreatitis include open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, percutaneous drainage, and endoscopic drainage. In the recent years, minimally invasive approaches have largely replaced open surgical necrosectomy. Endoscopic drainage of walled off pancreatic necrosis involves creation of a transmural fistula between the enteral lumen and WOPN cavity with stent placement under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. Furthermore, direct endoscopic necrosectomy can be performed through the fistula track. The best timing for endoscopic necrosectomy is not yet defined. A recent retrospective study suggested that immediate necrosectomy after stent placement results in earlier resolution of WOPN with fewer sessions of endoscopic necrosectomy. The aim of this study is to compare immediate vs. on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with infected WOPN who undergo EUS-guided transmural drainage of WOPN.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedOctober 14, 2025
October 1, 2025
2.7 years
September 2, 2022
October 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical success rate
Clinical success rate is compared between the two groups. Clinical success is defined as complete resolution of WOPN without residual fluid component along with resolution of symptoms three months after stent placement
Three months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
procedure-related adverse events
Three months
Length of hospital stay
Three months
Number of necrosectomy sessions
Three months
Total duration of necrosectomies (in miniute)
Three months
Rate of new onset diabetes mellitus
Three months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Immediate endoscopic Necrosectomy
EXPERIMENTALThe subject will have endoscopic necrosectomy at the time of the EUS-guided transmural stent placement. The necrotic collection is identified with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Transmural placement of stent under EUS guidance is performed. The type of stent is at the discretion of endoscopist. It could be either lumen apposing metallic stent or double pigtail plastic stent. Immediately after stent placement, the cystoenterostomy track is dilated with a 15 mm through the scope (TTS) balloon. Then, direct endoscopic necrosectomy is performed with CO2 insufflation. The duration of necrosectomy will be 30 to 90 minutes. If complete clearance of the cavity is achieved before 30 minutes, the duration of necrosectomy may be less than 30 minutes in the given session. Also, if any complication occurs during necrosectomy, appropriate management will be done, and the procedure may be concluded earlier.
On-demand endoscopic necrosectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe subject will have EUS-guided transmural drainage of the necrotic collection The necrotic collection is identified with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Transmural placement of stent under EUS guidance is performed. The type of stent is at the discretion of endoscopist. It could be either lumen apposing metallic stent or double pigtail plastic stent. In this group, endoscopic necrosectomy is not performed at the time of index procedure. Such patients may undergo endoscopic necrosectomy during follow up if clinically indicated.
Interventions
Initially, a tract is created between the stomach or duodenum with the walled-off pancreatic necrotic collection through placement of a stent. Then, the endosocpe is entered the necrotic cavity with CO2 insufflation, and the necrotic materials are removed with snare, grasper, or suctioning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Documented history of acute pancreatitis
- Necrotic collection with partial or complete wall diagnosed on CT or MRI
- Necrotic collection of any size with any number of loculations with more than 20% of solid/necrotic component
- Necrotic collection is accessible and amenable for EUS-guided drainage
- Age \>= 18 years
- Suspected or confirmed infection in the necrotic collection
- The patient understands and accepts to sign the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Irreversible coagulopathy with INR\>1.5 or platelet counts \<50,000
- Necrotic collection is not accessible for EUS-guided drainage
- Females who are pregnant
- Previous intervention (e,g, percutaneous drainage, or surgery) is performed for the patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Ave.,
Tehran, Tehran Province, 1411713135, Iran
Related Publications (7)
Lankisch PG, Apte M, Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):85-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60649-8. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
PMID: 25616312RESULTPeery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, Dellon ES, Eluri S, Gangarosa LM, Jensen ET, Lund JL, Pasricha S, Runge T, Schmidt M, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS. Burden of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1731-1741.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.045. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
PMID: 26327134RESULTBaron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA. American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):67-75.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
PMID: 31479658RESULTMouli VP, Sreenivas V, Garg PK. Efficacy of conservative treatment, without necrosectomy, for infected pancreatic necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):333-340.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
PMID: 23063972RESULTBoxhoorn L, Voermans RP, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Verdonk RC, Boermeester MA, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2020 Sep 5;396(10252):726-734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6.
PMID: 32891214RESULTvan Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Schaapherder AF, van Eijck CH, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Timmer R, Lameris JS, Kruyt PM, Manusama ER, van der Harst E, van der Schelling GP, Karsten T, Hesselink EJ, van Laarhoven CJ, Rosman C, Bosscha K, de Wit RJ, Houdijk AP, van Leeuwen MS, Buskens E, Gooszen HG; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1491-502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908821.
PMID: 20410514RESULTYan L, Dargan A, Nieto J, Shariaha RZ, Binmoeller KF, Adler DG, DeSimone M, Berzin T, Swahney M, Draganov PV, Yang DJ, Diehl DL, Wang L, Ghulab A, Butt N, Siddiqui AA. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy at the time of transmural stent placement results in earlier resolution of complex walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Results from a large multicenter United States trial. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 May-Jun;8(3):172-179. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_108_17.
PMID: 29882517RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Alireza Delavari, MD
Chair, Digestive dieseases research institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor of medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2022
First Posted
September 7, 2022
Study Start
September 12, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
October 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
IPD will be shared with other researchers for collaborative studies upon request from the principle investigator