NCT05530772

Brief Summary

Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common diagnoses made in gastroenterology wards worldwide which causes a great deal of pain and expense along with fatal complications. Approximately, 10-20% of patients progress to necrotizing pancreatitis that result in significant morbidity and mortality. Initial conservative management may be feasible in necrotizing pancreatitis, however the majority of patients with infected necrosis or persistent symptoms will eventually require a drainage procedure. Drainage procedures for necrotizing pancreatitis include open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, percutaneous drainage, and endoscopic drainage. In the recent years, minimally invasive approaches have largely replaced open surgical necrosectomy. Endoscopic drainage of walled off pancreatic necrosis involves creation of a transmural fistula between the enteral lumen and WOPN cavity with stent placement under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. Furthermore, direct endoscopic necrosectomy can be performed through the fistula track. The best timing for endoscopic necrosectomy is not yet defined. A recent retrospective study suggested that immediate necrosectomy after stent placement results in earlier resolution of WOPN with fewer sessions of endoscopic necrosectomy. The aim of this study is to compare immediate vs. on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with infected WOPN who undergo EUS-guided transmural drainage of WOPN.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 7, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 12, 2022

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

October 14, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

September 2, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical success rate

    Clinical success rate is compared between the two groups. Clinical success is defined as complete resolution of WOPN without residual fluid component along with resolution of symptoms three months after stent placement

    Three months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • procedure-related adverse events

    Three months

  • Length of hospital stay

    Three months

  • Number of necrosectomy sessions

    Three months

  • Total duration of necrosectomies (in miniute)

    Three months

  • Rate of new onset diabetes mellitus

    Three months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Immediate endoscopic Necrosectomy

EXPERIMENTAL

The subject will have endoscopic necrosectomy at the time of the EUS-guided transmural stent placement. The necrotic collection is identified with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Transmural placement of stent under EUS guidance is performed. The type of stent is at the discretion of endoscopist. It could be either lumen apposing metallic stent or double pigtail plastic stent. Immediately after stent placement, the cystoenterostomy track is dilated with a 15 mm through the scope (TTS) balloon. Then, direct endoscopic necrosectomy is performed with CO2 insufflation. The duration of necrosectomy will be 30 to 90 minutes. If complete clearance of the cavity is achieved before 30 minutes, the duration of necrosectomy may be less than 30 minutes in the given session. Also, if any complication occurs during necrosectomy, appropriate management will be done, and the procedure may be concluded earlier.

Device: Endoscopic necrosectomy

On-demand endoscopic necrosectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The subject will have EUS-guided transmural drainage of the necrotic collection The necrotic collection is identified with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Transmural placement of stent under EUS guidance is performed. The type of stent is at the discretion of endoscopist. It could be either lumen apposing metallic stent or double pigtail plastic stent. In this group, endoscopic necrosectomy is not performed at the time of index procedure. Such patients may undergo endoscopic necrosectomy during follow up if clinically indicated.

Device: Endoscopic necrosectomy

Interventions

Initially, a tract is created between the stomach or duodenum with the walled-off pancreatic necrotic collection through placement of a stent. Then, the endosocpe is entered the necrotic cavity with CO2 insufflation, and the necrotic materials are removed with snare, grasper, or suctioning.

Immediate endoscopic NecrosectomyOn-demand endoscopic necrosectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Documented history of acute pancreatitis
  • Necrotic collection with partial or complete wall diagnosed on CT or MRI
  • Necrotic collection of any size with any number of loculations with more than 20% of solid/necrotic component
  • Necrotic collection is accessible and amenable for EUS-guided drainage
  • Age \>= 18 years
  • Suspected or confirmed infection in the necrotic collection
  • The patient understands and accepts to sign the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Irreversible coagulopathy with INR\>1.5 or platelet counts \<50,000
  • Necrotic collection is not accessible for EUS-guided drainage
  • Females who are pregnant
  • Previous intervention (e,g, percutaneous drainage, or surgery) is performed for the patient

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Ave.,

Tehran, Tehran Province, 1411713135, Iran

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Lankisch PG, Apte M, Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):85-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60649-8. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

  • Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, Dellon ES, Eluri S, Gangarosa LM, Jensen ET, Lund JL, Pasricha S, Runge T, Schmidt M, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS. Burden of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1731-1741.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.045. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

  • Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA. American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):67-75.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

  • Mouli VP, Sreenivas V, Garg PK. Efficacy of conservative treatment, without necrosectomy, for infected pancreatic necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):333-340.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

  • Boxhoorn L, Voermans RP, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Verdonk RC, Boermeester MA, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2020 Sep 5;396(10252):726-734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6.

  • van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Schaapherder AF, van Eijck CH, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Timmer R, Lameris JS, Kruyt PM, Manusama ER, van der Harst E, van der Schelling GP, Karsten T, Hesselink EJ, van Laarhoven CJ, Rosman C, Bosscha K, de Wit RJ, Houdijk AP, van Leeuwen MS, Buskens E, Gooszen HG; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1491-502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908821.

  • Yan L, Dargan A, Nieto J, Shariaha RZ, Binmoeller KF, Adler DG, DeSimone M, Berzin T, Swahney M, Draganov PV, Yang DJ, Diehl DL, Wang L, Ghulab A, Butt N, Siddiqui AA. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy at the time of transmural stent placement results in earlier resolution of complex walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Results from a large multicenter United States trial. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 May-Jun;8(3):172-179. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_108_17.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PancreatitisPancreatic DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Alireza Delavari, MD

    Chair, Digestive dieseases research institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor of medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2022

First Posted

September 7, 2022

Study Start

September 12, 2022

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

October 14, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD will be shared with other researchers for collaborative studies upon request from the principle investigator

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR

Locations