Comparative Effect of MEP With or Without Current Emission in the Treatment of Cervical Pain in MTrPs of the Trapezius
Comparative Effect of Percutaneous Microelectrolysis With or Without Current Emission in the Treatment of Cervical Pain in Myofascial Trigger Points of the Trapezius
1 other identifier
interventional
95
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is initial to other pathologies such as neck pain or tension headaches; the symptoms that are located on the area of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) of specific references in different muscles. MTrPs are palpable, tense bands found in stiff muscle that cause pain and swelling. They affect the disruptive soft tissues, resulting in deterioration of the muscle and fascia; effects that can be transferred further, through the myofascial chain to distant tissues, inducing the referred pain that is the main feature of MPS. MTrPs are treated with stretching, massage, analgesics, acupuncture, dry needling, electrical stimulation, and ultrasound. Percutaneous microelectrolysis (MEP®) is a new technique that uses galvanic current of low intensity and high density. Based on the previous reviews, the investigators consider that the use of MEP in individuals who have MTrPs in the trapezius is more effective than acupuncture treatment. Objectives: To assess the effect of MEP as a technique for treating pain in MTrPs of the trapezius muscle compared to without current emission, analyzing function, pain and strength in MTrPs before and after both treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 13, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2023
CompletedApril 19, 2023
April 1, 2023
4 months
August 13, 2022
April 18, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire
The validated and adapted Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) relates to activities of daily living. The outcome measure is in Points per NPQ protocol. The questionnaire will be completed prior to treatment. Nominal variables were described by of proportions with a confidence interval of 95%; Chi-Square test (Pearson's test), based on a significance level of p˂0.05 in all cases.
will take place over 3 weeks, with one session per week.
Mobility with a goniometer
The range of joint mobility of flexion, extension, inclination and rotation movements will be measured with a goniometer. The outcome measure is in degrees, before and after treatment. Evaluating the comparative effect of percutaneous microelectrolysis with or without current emission in the treatment of cervical pain in trapezius myofascial trigger points.
will take place over 3 weeks, with one session per week.
Objective pain measurement with a dynamometer
It is the objective measurement of pain, through the measurement of results in the Newton (N) unit to perform force measurements and objectively evaluate the pain threshold at strategic points of the trapezius muscle, using the DINATOR® portable dynamometer. It will be measured with the dynamometer before and after treatment with or without current. Evaluated comparative effect of percutaneous microelectrolysis with or without current emission in the treatment of cervical pain in myofascial trigger points of the trapezius.
will take place over 3 weeks, with one session per week.
visual analogue scale
The evaluation is carried out through the visual analogue scale (VAS) with the outcome measure from 0 to 10 (10 the worst pain experienced and 0 no pain); change from pain level to baseline pain level before and after treatment. The Chi-Square test (Pearson's test) will be implemented for the analysis of categorical data and the "t" test for paired data for quantitative data, based on a significance level of p˂0.05 in all cases. Evaluated comparative effect of percutaneous microelectrolysis with or without current emission in the treatment of cervical pain in myofascial trigger points of the trapezius.
will take place over 3 weeks, with one session per week.
Study Arms (2)
without current emission in the treatment
SHAM COMPARATORpercutaneous microelectrolysis without current emission in the treatment of cervical pain in myofascial trigger points of the trapezius. Both will take place over 3 weeks, with one session per week.
wit current emission in the treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORpercutaneous microelectrolysis with current emission in the treatment of cervical pain in myofascial trigger points of the trapezius. oth will take place over 3 weeks, with one session per week.
Interventions
percutaneous microelectrolysis with or without current emission in the treatment of cervical pain in myofascial trigger points of the trapezius
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- with medical referral for pain of at least 1 month of evolution
- presenting on both sides of the trapezius MTrPs muscle
You may not qualify if:
- neck pain who do currently receive physiotherapeutic treatment of at least 1 month of evolution
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro de Investigación, Extensión y Capacitación de la Escuela de Kinesiología y Fisioterapia
Córdoba, 5000, Argentina
Related Publications (1)
Margalef R, Bosque M, Monclus P, Flores P, Minaya-Munoz F, Valera-Garrido F, Santafe MM. Percutaneous Application of Galvanic Current in Rodents Reverses Signs of Myofascial Trigger Points. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 May 28;2020:4173218. doi: 10.1155/2020/4173218. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32565858RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Vilma Campana, Dr
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Both groups do not know if the treatment has emission or not while the sessions are carried out.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator (Bachelor of Kinesiology and Physiotherapy)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2022
First Posted
September 1, 2022
Study Start
August 16, 2022
Primary Completion
November 30, 2022
Study Completion
March 30, 2023
Last Updated
April 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share