Effect of Lidocaine and Ozone in Injection for Myofascial Pain
Comparison of the Efficacy of Lidocaine and Ozone in Masticatory Muscle Injections for Patients With Myofascial Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a chronic soft tissue rheumatism characterized by tense, painful muscle bands, known as trigger points, located within the muscle or fascia. These trigger points typically lead to pain during movement, limiting muscle extension and reducing mobility. While various treatments exist for MPS, the most common approach is injecting local anesthetic agents directly into the trigger points to relieve pain. Recently, systemic and local ozone therapy has also gained popularity as an alternative treatment for MPS. Ozone can be injected directly into muscles in areas such as the back and waist to target pain and inflammation. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of ozone therapy with lidocaine injection in patients diagnosed with MPS.The aim of this study was to compare 2% non-vasoconstrictor lidocaine and ozone injections in the treatment of patients presenting to the clinic with myofascial pain syndrome and to determine the more therapeutic method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2025
CompletedJanuary 10, 2025
January 1, 2025
2.8 years
December 19, 2024
January 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
1. The pain assessment after injections
The primary outcome was the Visual Analog Score (VAS), a simple tool that allows the patient to express pain visually and numerically and is particularly effective in measuring subjective sensations. The patient is asked to choose a number between 0 and 10 indicating the pain level, with 0 indicating the least pain and 10 indicating the most pain.
Three months
2. Headache evaluation after injections
The second outcome was the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), which is used to assess headaches. 6 indicates the lowest score, and 13 indicates the highest score.
Three months
3. Sleep quality evaluation after injections
The third outcome was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), consists of 7 main components and a total of 19 questions. Each component is scored from 0 to 3; the total PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21. High scores indicate a decrease in quality of life while descending scores indicate an increase.
Three months
Study Arms (2)
Streaming of patients and administration of substances
EXPERIMENTAL60 patients with myofascial pain syndrome who met the inclusion criteria were divided into four groups into isotonic saline, lidocaine, ozone gas and ozonated isotonic saline. Then the injections were done for each group.
Repetition of tests at certain intervals
EXPERIMENTALQuality of life was evaluated by administering PSQI and HIT-6 tests at postoperative 1st and 3rd months.
Interventions
Patients who had injections were asked to mark their headache severities with a survey includes six questions about their past 4 weeks. The test applied preoperatively, postoperatively 1st and 3rd months.
Patients who had injections were asked to reply some questions about their sleeping habits for past 4 weeks. The test applied preoperatively, postoperatively 1st and 3rd months.
Patients who had injections are asked to state their pain with a 10 cm visual analogue scale preoperatively and postoperatively 1st,2nd weeks and 1st and 3rd months.
1 ml of insulin needle with a 27-gauge ½ inch 13 mm needle tip will be injected into up to 4 trigger points in the taut bands that cause the most pain in the masseter muscle. Injections were done at most 3 times. As the control group, the first group was injected with isotonic saline; the second group was injected with 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor; the third group with ozone gas; and the fourth group with ozonated isotonic saline.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- No temporomandibular joint treatment within the last year.
- Presence of palpable trigger points in the unilateral/bilateral masseter muscle.
- Classified as ASA 1 or ASA 2.
- Chronic pain in the masseter muscle for at least the past three months.
- Presence of at least two palpable trigger points in the unilateral or bilateral masseter muscle, with a pain score of ≥ 3 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) upon palpation
You may not qualify if:
- History of allergy to any anesthetic agent.
- Use of anticoagulant medications.
- Use of analgesics, muscle relaxants, or antidepressants within the last month.
- Diagnosed with specific conditions such as migraine, neuromuscular junction disorders, fibromyalgia, depression, or schizophrenia.
- History of trauma, tumor, or surgery in the head-neck region.
- Presence of skin infection in the relevant area.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yağmur Malkoclead
- Istanbul Medipol University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University
Istanbul, Fatih, 34083, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Albagieh H, Aloyouny A, Alshehri N, Alsammahi N, Almutrafi D, Hadlaq E. Efficacy of lidocaine versus mepivacaine in the management of myofascial pain. Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Oct;28(10):1238-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
PMID: 33132718BACKGROUNDYilmaz O, Sivrikaya EC, Taskesen F, Pirpir C, Ciftci S. Comparison of the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin, Local Anesthesia, and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Patients With Myofascial Trigger Points in the Masseter Muscle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;79(1):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
PMID: 33045182BACKGROUNDKamanli A, Kaya A, Ardicoglu O, Ozgocmen S, Zengin FO, Bayik Y. Comparison of lidocaine injection, botulinum toxin injection, and dry needling to trigger points in myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2005 Oct;25(8):604-11. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0485-6. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
PMID: 15372199BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
ÇAĞRI DELİLBAŞI, PROF.
Medipol universitesi diş hastanesi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2024
First Posted
January 10, 2025
Study Start
March 25, 2021
Primary Completion
January 14, 2024
Study Completion
September 27, 2024
Last Updated
January 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share