NCT05523284

Brief Summary

Endometriosis is a benign gynecological disease characterized by uterine-like cells growing outside the uterus, leading to pain, infertility, and inflammation. Endometriosis most commonly occurs in the forms of Superficial Endometriosis (SE), Deep Endometriosis and Ovarian Endometriosis (Endometrioma) (OE). Ultrasound diagnosis of DE and OE has become more reliable with advances in ultrasound technology, technique and expertise, leading to decreased diagnosis time for patients and allowing for better optimization of surgeries if required. SE, however, lacks any reliable non-invasive diagnosis methods. SE is the most common form of endometriosis and is defined as a disease that lines the peritoneum and is small and superficial in nature, leading to chronic inflammation, infertility, and pain. SE is difficult to visualize on ultrasound due to its size and alignment with tissue, requiring fluid to expand the pelvis and partially suspend these small lesions, allowing them to be diagnosed through ultrasound. Leonardi et al. observed that in some patients, a physiologic change occurs whereby fluid fills the pouch of Douglas (POD), allowing increased visualizing during ultrasound. This led to the development of Saline-infused sonoPODgraphy (SPG), a novel method utilizing modified commonly used ultrasound techniques called saline-infusion sonohysterography (SIS) and hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy), to reliably visualize the POD (Leonardi et al, 2019). Visualizing the POD is important as SE is often deposited in the POD. This diagnostic accuracy pilot study aims to pioneer the technique whereby SPG will be evaluated as a novel, rapid, non-invasive diagnostic tool for SE. The injected fluid from the POD will be withdrawn and evaluated for novel biomarkers, allowing us to further develop rapid diagnostics and better understand disease mechanisms. We hypothesize that SPG will allow for the diagnosis of SE with a diagnostic accuracy parallel to the current invasive gold standard, laparoscopy.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
8mo left

Started Nov 2023

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress79%
Nov 2023Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 31, 2022

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 15, 2023

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

August 29, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

EndometriosisDiagnosisUltrasoundBiomarkers

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Determine the diagnostic accuracy of SPG as a non-invasive diagnostic modality for superficial endometriosis, in the absence of DE, OE, and POD obliteration.

    The diagnostic accuracy of SPG and biomarkers will be compared to the current gold standard, laparoscopy and histology.

    2022-2024

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • 1. Characterize superficial endometriosis under TVS using modified descriptors from the Leonardi et al (2020) SPG study.

    2022-2024

  • 2. Determine the association between TVS and surgical characteristics of superficial endometriosis using the accepted World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) guidelines

    2022-2024

  • 3. Assess the tolerability and acceptance of SPG as a rapid, non-invasive diagnostic technique for SE among those with endometriosis using a questionnaire

    2022-2024

  • 4. Externally validate the Determine the rate of success rate of SPG (fluid filling the POD) from a technicity perspective

    2022-2024

Interventions

SonoPODographyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

SonoPODography (SPG) is a novel ultrasound-guided technique whereby saline is injected through the cervix and flushed into the POD, creating an acoustic window for diagnosing superficial endometriosis.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

All participants will be recruited from the McMaster Women's Health Clinic during routine pelvic evaluation using transvaginal ultrasound to assess the pelvic and abdominal cavity for any pathologies. Only participants with a uterus (assigned female at birth) will be eligible to join the study.

You may qualify if:

  • Years of Age
  • Assigned Female at Birth
  • Confirmed or Suspected Case of Superficial Endometriosis
  • Willing and Able to Provide Informed Written Consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Pre-Menarche or Post-Menopausal
  • No History of Vaginal Penetration / Intercourse
  • Concern for pre-malignancy or presence/history of malignancy
  • Known Bleeding Disorder
  • Presence of Deep or Ovarian Endometriosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Leonardi M, Robledo KP, Espada M, Vanza K, Condous G. SonoPODography: A new diagnostic technique for visualizing superficial endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.051. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

  • Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, Bourdon M, Lafay-Pillet MC, Millischer AE, Streuli I, Borghese B, Petraglia F, Santulli P. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1393-1401. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex088.

  • Cheong YC, Shelton JB, Laird SM, Richmond M, Kudesia G, Li TC, Ledger WL. IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-alpha concentrations in the peritoneal fluid of women with pelvic adhesions. Hum Reprod. 2002 Jan;17(1):69-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.1.69.

  • Deslandes A, Parange N, Childs JT, Osborne B, Bezak E. Current Status of Transvaginal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Before Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Aug;39(8):1477-1490. doi: 10.1002/jum.15246. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

  • Forster R, Sarginson A, Velichkova A, Hogg C, Dorning A, Horne AW, Saunders PTK, Greaves E. Macrophage-derived insulin-like growth factor-1 is a key neurotrophic and nerve-sensitizing factor in pain associated with endometriosis. FASEB J. 2019 Oct;33(10):11210-11222. doi: 10.1096/fj.201900797R. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

  • Goncalves MO, Siufi Neto J, Andres MP, Siufi D, de Mattos LA, Abrao MS. Systematic evaluation of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound can accurately replace diagnostic laparoscopy, mainly for deep and ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2021 May 17;36(6):1492-1500. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab085.

  • Leonardi M, Espada M, Lu C, Stamatopoulos N, Condous G. A Novel Ultrasound Technique Called Saline Infusion SonoPODography to Visualize and Understand the Pouch of Douglas and Posterior Compartment Contents: A Feasibility Study. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Dec;38(12):3301-3309. doi: 10.1002/jum.15022. Epub 2019 May 15.

  • Piessens S, Edwards A. Sonographic Evaluation for Endometriosis in Routine Pelvic Ultrasound. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Feb;27(2):265-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.027. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

  • Reis FM, Santulli P, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Lafay-Pillet MC, Chapron C. Superficial Peritoneal Endometriosis: Clinical Characteristics of 203 Confirmed Cases and 1292 Endometriosis-Free Controls. Reprod Sci. 2020 Jan;27(1):309-315. doi: 10.1007/s43032-019-00028-1. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

  • Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 May;10(5):261-75. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.255. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

  • Vitonis AF, Vincent K, Rahmioglu N, Fassbender A, Buck Louis GM, Hummelshoj L, Giudice LC, Stratton P, Adamson GD, Becker CM, Zondervan KT, Missmer SA; WERF EPHect Working Group. World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project: II. Clinical and covariate phenotype data collection in endometriosis research. Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1244. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

  • Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1244-1256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1810764. No abstract available.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

SPG fluid (flushed saline) will be aspirated from the POD and evaluated using full proteomic and genomic analysis.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

EndometriosisDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2022

First Posted

August 31, 2022

Study Start

November 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

February 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-05

Locations