The Effectiveness of HBM-based Education Program on Improve Knowledge and Behaviors
The Effectiveness of Health Belief Model Based Education Program on Improve Knowledge and Behaviors Related to Undernutrition Among Mothers With Children Under Two Years in Indonesia
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The randomized controlled trial design with one intervention arm (nutrition education and complementary feeding) and one control (usual care) arm (1:1 ratio). Randomization of each participant to the groups will be carried out using Random Allocation Software 1.0 (https://random-allocation-oftware.software.informer.com/1.0/) to intervention or control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The sample size to be recruited is 80 participants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2022
CompletedJune 4, 2024
June 1, 2024
4 months
August 19, 2022
June 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Knowledge of Undernutrition
The Mother's Knowledge of Child Undernutrition questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess mother knowledge related to children undernutrition (Mardani et al., 2014), with Cronbach alpha 0.87. This questionnaire consists of 26 items of questions referring to the definition, types, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, management, and prevention of malnutrition in children. Each question has four answer options (A, B, C, D). A correct answer is scored at one point, while a wrong answer is scored at zero. The sum of answers will be calculated to obtain the total knowledge scores for that participant. The item score ranged from 0 to 26. The higher the score, the greater the understanding related to children's undernutrition
before intervention
Knowledge of Undernutrition
The Mother's Knowledge of Child Undernutrition questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess mother knowledge related to children undernutrition (Mardani et al., 2014), with Cronbach alpha 0.87. This questionnaire consists of 26 items of questions referring to the definition, types, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, management, and prevention of malnutrition in children. Each question has four answer options (A, B, C, D). A correct answer is scored at one point, while a wrong answer is scored at zero. The sum of answers will be calculated to obtain the total knowledge scores for that participant. The item score ranged from 0 to 26. The higher the score, the greater the understanding related to children's undernutrition
at two weeks after intervention
Complementary Feeding Practice
The complementary feeding practice questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess mother's knowledge and competence related to complementary feeding (Hajri et al., 2016), with Cronbach alpha 0.92. This questionnaire contains 29 questions referring to the practice of breastfeeding/complementary feeding, feeding practices based on food safety, responsive feeding practices, and practice of adequate feeding. The answers to this questionnaire are based on two kinds of interval scales: (1) score 0 = if the answer is not recommended, 1 = recommended; and (2) an interval scale with scores of 1 = never, 2 = rarely (1-2 times/week), 3 = sometimes (3-4 times/week), 4 = frequently (5-6 times/week), and 5 = always (every day). The high score indicates that mothers have greater understanding refer to complementary feeding in children. The high score indicates that mothers have greater understanding refer to complementary feeding in children.
before intervention
Complementary Feeding Practice
The complementary feeding practice questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess mother's knowledge and competence related to complementary feeding (Hajri et al., 2016), with Cronbach alpha 0.92. This questionnaire contains 29 questions referring to the practice of breastfeeding/complementary feeding, feeding practices based on food safety, responsive feeding practices, and practice of adequate feeding. The answers to this questionnaire are based on two kinds of interval scales: (1) score 0 = if the answer is not recommended, 1 = recommended; and (2) an interval scale with scores of 1 = never, 2 = rarely (1-2 times/week), 3 = sometimes (3-4 times/week), 4 = frequently (5-6 times/week), and 5 = always (every day). The high score indicates that mothers have greater understanding refer to complementary feeding in children. The high score indicates that mothers have greater understanding refer to complementary feeding in children.
at two weeks after intervention
Self-efficacy
The self-efficacy questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess a mother's self-efficacy in feeding children (Hajri et al., 2016), with Cronbach alpha 0.93. This questionnaire includes 28 questions about a healthy diet and food variety; the amount of food; meal cues; meals based on child development; and general efficacy for feeding children. Each question has scale 0-10. The item score ranged from 0 to 280. The higher the number indicates, the more confident. Research assistants will collect the data before and after the intervention
before intervention
Self-efficacy
The self-efficacy questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess a mother's self-efficacy in feeding children (Hajri et al., 2016), with Cronbach alpha 0.93. This questionnaire includes 28 questions about a healthy diet and food variety; the amount of food; meal cues; meals based on child development; and general efficacy for feeding children. Each question has scale 0-10. The item score ranged from 0 to 280. The higher the number indicates, the more confident. Research assistants will collect the data before and after the intervention
at two weeks after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight)
before intervention
Undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight)
at three months after intervention
Undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight)
at six months after intervention
Study Arms (2)
health nutrition education
EXPERIMENTALThe participants in intervention group will receive health nutrition education based on a health belief model including nutrition health education (booklet), and telephone call support.
usual care
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group will only receive usual care. Usual care is routine measurement of children including height, length, weight, head circumference, monitoring children's activities, and monitoring the immunization status of children.
Interventions
The participants in intervention group will receive health nutrition education based on a health belief model including nutrition health education (booklet), and telephone call support.
Control group will only receive usual care. Usual care is routine measurement of children including height, length, weight, head circumference, monitoring children's activities, and monitoring the immunization status of children.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mothers who have children under 2 years of ages with undernutrition categories residences in Lombok Barat or Lombok Tengah District,
- Mothers who are able to speak Bahasa or Sasak languages,
- Mothers who are able to use a telephone.
You may not qualify if:
- Mothers with impaired cognitive function, and psychiatric diseases,
- Children suffering from severe/chronic diseases, mental retardation, physical disability,
- Children with hospitalization within six months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Medical University
Taipei County, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hui-Chuan Huang, Ph.D
Taipei Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The randomization will be performed by a research assistant with no access to participant information and who did not participate in the enrolment process. The person performing the intervention will be blinded to group allocation. Outcome data will be collected by another two blinded research assistants, one for the intervention group and one for the control group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2022
First Posted
August 26, 2022
Study Start
September 10, 2022
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 30, 2022
Last Updated
June 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
all IPD that underlie results in a publication