Impact of Real-time Notification of Colonoscopic Optical Diagnosis on Patients' Anxiety and Depression After Polypectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The accuracy of endoscopic optical diagnosis for colorectal polyps has been approaching histological diagnosis after implementation of image enhancement endoscopic technologies. The real-time notification of possible nature of resected polyp after colonoscopy is expected to reduce the anxiety and depression level of the patients before the availability of histological diagnosis and improve their quality of life. We designed and conducted a randomized control trial to confirm this hypothesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedAugust 26, 2022
August 1, 2022
3 years
August 19, 2022
August 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of definite anxiety cases
The level of anxiety of the two study arms will be measured by using the Taiwan version questionnaire of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) right before the next scheduled clinic for histological results. The anxiety score of this questionnaire ranging from 0 to 21. Scored 0 to 7 defined as normal case, scored 8 to 10 defined as doubtful case, and scored 11 to 21 defined as definite case. The proportion of definite anxiety cases of the two study arms will be compared.
This outcome will be assessed right before the next scheduled clinic for histological results (around 1 to 2 weeks after polypectomy)..
Proportion of definite depression cases
The level of depression of the two study arms will be measured by using the Taiwan version questionnaire of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) right before the next scheduled clinic for histological results. The depression score of this questionnaire ranging from 0 to 21. Scored 0 to 7 defined as normal case, scored 8 to 10 defined as doubtful case, and scored 11 to 21 defined as definite case. The proportion of definite depression cases of the two study arms will be compared.
This outcome will be assessed right before the next scheduled clinic for histological results (around 1 to 2 weeks after polypectomy)..
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Anxiety score
This outcome will be assessed right before the next scheduled clinic for histological results (around 1 to 2 weeks after polypectomy)..
Depression score
This outcome will be assessed right before the next scheduled clinic for histological results (around 1 to 2 weeks after polypectomy)..
Study Arms (2)
Ordinary care (OC)
NO INTERVENTIONThe participants of this arm received the endoscopic optical diagnosis, histological diagnosis of the resected colon polyps and the recommended surveillance colonoscopy schedule at next scheduled clinic visit (around 1 to 2 weeks later).
Real-time notification (RTN)
EXPERIMENTALThe participants of this arm received the endoscopic optical diagnosis of the resected colon polyps and the recommended surveillance colonoscopy schedule right after the sedated colonoscopy. Histological diagnosis will be informed at next scheduled clinic visit (around 1 to 2 weeks later).
Interventions
The participants assigned to real-time notification group will received the endoscopic diagnosis of the resected colorectal polyps and recommended surveillance colonoscopy schedule right after the sedated colonoscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of ≥ 40 years and \< 80 years
- Outpatients who prepare receiving sedated colonoscopy
- Subjects who have signed informed consent form of this study
- Informed consensus has been obtained that endoscopic resection should be performed if a colorectal polyp is found
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scale among 0 to 2
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with any of the following prior history or current conditions:
- (a) Contraindications to colonoscopy
- (b) Major mental illnesses, e.g. major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder ...
- (c) Inflammatory bowel disease
- (d) Hereditary or non-hereditary polyposis syndrome, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer
- (e) Uncured colorectal cancer
- (f) Active gastrointestinal bleeding
- (g) Pregnancy
- Subjects who do not received polypectomy during colonoscopy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital
New Taipei City, 24352, Taiwan
Related Publications (11)
Giorgi Rossi P, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, Di Felice E, Caroli S, Ferrari F, Mangone L, Pezzarossi A, Roncaglia F, Campari C, Sassatelli R, Sacchero R, Sereni G, Paterlini L, Zappa M. Impact of Screening Program on Incidence of Colorectal Cancer: A Cohort Study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;110(9):1359-66. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.240. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
PMID: 26303133BACKGROUNDChiu HM, Chen SL, Yen AM, Chiu SY, Fann JC, Lee YC, Pan SL, Wu MS, Liao CS, Chen HH, Koong SL, Chiou ST. Effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing in reducing colorectal cancer mortality from the One Million Taiwanese Screening Program. Cancer. 2015 Sep 15;121(18):3221-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29462. Epub 2015 May 20.
PMID: 25995082BACKGROUNDDenters MJ, Deutekom M, Bossuyt PM, Fockens P, Dekker E. Patient burden of colonoscopy after positive fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy. 2013;45(5):342-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326238. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
PMID: 23483433BACKGROUNDDenters MJ, Deutekom M, Essink-Bot ML, Bossuyt PM, Fockens P, Dekker E. FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct;21(10):2809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1867-7. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
PMID: 23729229BACKGROUNDOba S, Tanaka S, Sano Y, Oka S, Chayama K. Current status of narrow-band imaging magnifying colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia in Japan. Digestion. 2011;83(3):167-72. doi: 10.1159/000321807. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
PMID: 21266811BACKGROUNDSumimoto K, Tanaka S, Shigita K, Hayashi N, Hirano D, Tamaru Y, Ninomiya Y, Oka S, Arihiro K, Shimamoto F, Yoshihara M, Chayama K. Diagnostic performance of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for differentiation among noninvasive, superficially invasive, and deeply invasive colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Oct;86(4):700-709. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
PMID: 28257790BACKGROUNDMatsuda T, Fujii T, Saito Y, Nakajima T, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Ikehara H, Ikematsu H, Fu KI, Emura F, Ono A, Sano Y, Shimoda T, Fujimori T. Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2700-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02190.x. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
PMID: 18853968BACKGROUNDMason SE, Poynter L, Takats Z, Darzi A, Kinross JM. Optical Technologies for Endoscopic Real-Time Histologic Assessment of Colorectal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;114(8):1219-1230. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000156.
PMID: 30848728BACKGROUNDBackes Y, Moss A, Reitsma JB, Siersema PD, Moons LM. Narrow Band Imaging, Magnifying Chromoendoscopy, and Gross Morphological Features for the Optical Diagnosis of T1 Colorectal Cancer and Deep Submucosal Invasion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;112(1):54-64. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.403. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
PMID: 27644737BACKGROUNDASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, Chauhan SS, Hwang JH, Komanduri S, Manfredi M, Maple JT, Murad FM, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
PMID: 25597420BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The participants, care providers, investigators and outcome assessors are not blinded to the assigned study arm.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2022
First Posted
August 26, 2022
Study Start
August 20, 2022
Primary Completion
August 31, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
August 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share