Ventilatory Effects of THRIVE During EBUS
Does High Flow Nasal Canula (HFNC) Prevent Hypercapnia During EBUS Under Procedural Sedation?
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is used in interventional procedures to prevent hypoxia during sedation. In patients with a patent airway, HFNC reduces dead space ventilation as well. It is unknown if dead space ventilation is also reduced by HFNC in an EndoBroncheal UltraSound procedure, in which the airway is partially blocked by the endoscope. Especially in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) the partial blocking of the airway may reduce ventilation. If HFNC is able to reduce dead space during an EBUS-procedure, it may facilitate CO2 clearance, which may lead to a reduction in work of breathing. This study aims to investigate if HFNC reduces dead space ventilation in patients undergoing an EBUS-procedure and if this is flow-dependent. A randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study is designed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 8, 2024
CompletedAugust 15, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.8 years
August 10, 2022
August 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Inspiratory CO2 at 10 minutes (baseline)
Inspiratory CO2, measured at the carinal level
at t=10 minutes
Inspiratory CO2 at 25 minutes
Inspiratory CO2, measured at the carinal level
at=25 minutes
Inspiratory CO2 at 45 minutes
Inspiratory CO2, measured at the carinal level
at t=45 minutes
expiratory CO2 at 10 minutes (baseline)
Expiratory CO2, measured at the carinal level
at t=10 minutes
expiratory CO2 at 25 minutes
Expiratory CO2, measured at the carinal level
at t=25 minutes
expiratory CO2 at 45 minutes
Expiratory CO2, measured at the carinal level
t=45 minutes
Slope of capnography at 10 minutes (baseline)
Angle of the D-E segment (inspiratory slope)
At t=10 minutes
Slope of capnography at 25 minutes
Angle of the D-E segment (inspiratory slope)
At t=25 minutes
Slope of capnography at 45 minutes
Angle of the D-E segment (inspiratory slope)
At t=45 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Respiratory rate
At t=10 minutes
Respiratory rate
At t=25 minutes
Respiratory rate
At t=45 minutes
The level of HFNC dead space washout
At t=10 minutes
The level of HFNC dead space washout
At t=25 minutes
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
30 L - 70 L
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitially, all patients will receive 3L/min of oxygen for 10 minutes. Than, patients in this arm will receive 30L/min of High Flow Nasal Oxygen for 15 minutes and subsequently 70 L/min for another 15 minutes.
70 L - 30 L
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitially, all patients will receive 3L/min of oxygen for 10 minutes. Than, patients in this arm will receive 70L/min of High Flow Nasal Oxygen for 15 minutes and subsequently 30 L/min for another 15 minutes.
Interventions
2 different rates of nasal flow compared to each other and a baseline of level of nasal oxygen
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients with COPD Gold classification 3 or 4
- Scheduled EBUS with sedation
You may not qualify if:
- Known neurodegenerative diseases, such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, dementia, Multiple Sclerosis or Guillain-Barré.
- Allergy or intolerance for propofol or esketamine
- Severe pulmonary hypertension (PAPsyst \> 60 mmHg)
- Pregnancy
- upper airway obstruction, such as subglottic stenosis or obstructing tumors.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rijnstate Hospitallead
- Fisher and Paykel Healthcarecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Rijnstate Hospital
Arnhem, 6815 AD, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey Miechels
Dept. of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem
- STUDY CHAIR
Mark V Koning, MD, PhD
Dept. of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Niels Claessens, MD, PhD
Dept. of Pulmonology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient is sedated and the investigators are blinded for the randomization. Only the care provider is aware of the randomisation.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2022
First Posted
August 17, 2022
Study Start
October 5, 2022
Primary Completion
August 8, 2024
Study Completion
August 8, 2024
Last Updated
August 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Upon reasonable request and within the limits of the law on patient data distribution.