Safety and Efficacy of Carpal Stim in Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Two-Arm, Sham-Controlled, Parallel-Design Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Carpal Stim for Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Carpal Stim for pain relief in CTS subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 8, 2023
CompletedFebruary 27, 2023
February 1, 2023
10 months
August 9, 2022
February 23, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Effectiveness: The responder rate of the PRF group and Sham-Control group
1 hour after end of stimulation
Safety: Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs)
Up to 14 days
Safety: Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity 14th day compared to baseline
Median nerve sensory latency time change over 20%
14 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Proportion in responder in treatment and sham-controlled groups
3, 7, 14 days after end of stimulation
Change in NRS score in treatment and sham-controlled groups compared to baseline
1hr, 3, 7, 14 days after end of stimulation
Change in PGIC scale in treatment and sham-controlled compared to baseline
1hr, 3, 7, 14 days after end of stimulation
Change in GSS score in treatment and sham-controlled compared to baseline
1hr, 3, 7, 14 days after end of stimulation
Change in BCTQ-SSS score in treatment and sham-controlled compared to baseline
14 days after end of stimulation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sham Control Group
SHAM COMPARATORSubject receiving fake stimulation (no stimulation but same device procedure with PRF group)
PRF Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubject receiving 500 KHz PRF stimulation for 15 min
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects aged ≥ 20 years old during the recruitment phase
- Clinical diagnosis of CTS:
- Diagnosis of CTS was confirmed by Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV) but not limited to NCV
- Symptoms consistent with CTS for at least 3 months and the numerical rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 5 during the recruitment phase
- Willing to abstain from any other treatment or therapy for CTS throughout the trial except protocol-described medications
- The subject is willing and able to comply with the procedure and requirements of this trial
- The participant is able to understand and provide informed consent, and has signed their written informed consent in accordance with IRB requirements
You may not qualify if:
- Wrist fractures or cysts at the CTS affected side
- Wrist surgery within the past 3 months, especially carpal tunnel release surgery at the CTS affected side
- Receiving upper limb (including neck) surgery
- Injections of corticosteroids/cortisone into the wrist or hand within the past 3 months
- With a past medical history of diabetic polyneuropathy
- With a past medical history of rheumatoid arthritis
- With a past medical history of epilepsy
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
- Participation in any investigational study in the last 2 weeks or current enrollment in any trial.
- Active infection at the stimulator contact site during the recruitment phase
- Pregnant women or diagnosed with postpartum edema in the wrist per investigator's discretion
- Patients with implanted medical devices that are electronic products, such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators, pacemakers, spinal cord stimulation systems, or spinal cord drug infusion pumps
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GiMer Medicallead
Study Sites (5)
Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital
Hualien City, Taiwan
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan, Taiwan
Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
Taipei, Taiwan
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2022
First Posted
August 11, 2022
Study Start
March 9, 2022
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
February 8, 2023
Last Updated
February 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share