Evaluation of Implant-prosthetic Rehabilitation Performed With Two Implants With Different Surface Characteristics
Evaluation of a Bioactive Surface in Post-extraction Sites: Case Control Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this case-control study a bioactive implant surface was compared with traditional surfaced implants. Primary objectives: Test the implant stability in post-extractive sites, comparing traditional surfaced implants (MultiNeO CS, control group) to bioactive surfaced implants (NINA- MultiNeO NH, treatment group). Primary outcome endpoints were Implant stability, assessed through Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values and Marginal bone loss (MBL)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2023
CompletedSeptember 4, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.4 years
August 9, 2022
September 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Marginal bone loss
Radiographic evaluation of the marignal bone level around the implant using a periapical x ray. marginal bone loss is in millimeters and indicates how many millimeters of bone has been lost
6 months after implant placement
Marginal bone loss
Radiographic evaluation of the marignal bone level around the implant using a periapical x ray. marginal bone loss is in millimeters and indicates how many millimeters of bone has been lost
12 months after implant placement
Implant stability
check implant stability using resonant frequency analysis (RFA)
immediately after implant placement
Implant stability
check implant stability using resonant frequency analysis (RFA)
30 days after implant placement
Implant stability
check implant stability using resonant frequency analysis (RFA)
45 days after implant placement
Secondary Outcomes (1)
insertion torque curve
During implant placement (T0 baseline)
Study Arms (2)
NINA- MultiNeO NH
EXPERIMENTALimplant with bioactive surface
MultiNeO CS
ACTIVE COMPARATORimplant with traditional surface
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with type 1-2 post extraction sites
- Subject is 30-80 years old
- Patient ASA 1 or 2
- Patients with healthy periodontal conditions (Treated periodontitis, PI\<25%, BoP\<25%)
- Patients that are willing to sign an informed consent and participate in a clinical study
You may not qualify if:
- Absence Type 1-2 post extraction sites
- Patient ASA 3 or 4
- Untreated Periodontitis
- Any sites where an implant already failed sites
- Allergy declared to one or more medicaments to be used during treatment
- Pregnancy (confirmed by verbal inquiry)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Luigi Canullolead
Study Sites (1)
Studio Odont.Associato Dr.P.Cicchese E L.Canullo
Rome, Italy/Rome, 00198, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:172-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x.
PMID: 19663964BACKGROUNDHan J, Lulic M, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jun;21(6):605-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01909.x.
PMID: 20666787BACKGROUNDGianfreda F, Antonacci D, Raffone C, Muzzi M, Pistilli V, Bollero P. Microscopic Characterization of Bioactivate Implant Surfaces: Increasing Wettability Using Salts and Dry Technology. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 17;14(10):2608. doi: 10.3390/ma14102608.
PMID: 34067747BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luigi Canullo, DDS PhD
Studio odontoiatrico associato Cicchese Canullo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2022
First Posted
August 10, 2022
Study Start
April 22, 2022
Primary Completion
September 15, 2023
Study Completion
September 15, 2023
Last Updated
September 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- the data will be available for the duration of the study
- Access Criteria
- the data will be available for the duration of the study
Clinical data will be first recorded in EDC (electronic data capture). Then data will be entered into one-central computerized database. Patient adverse events will be reported, including during implant placement and throughout follow-up period. Implant details parameters and data will be recorded into EDC. The data then will be entered into one central computerized database and analyzed statistically for evaluation of the results. The study database will be designed and maintained using Microsoft Excel. an identification code will be assigned to each patient