Impact of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Breast Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
1,206
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) has an incidence of 46% in patients after breast cancer surgery, which seriously affects patients' physiological and psychological function, as well as quality of life. Acute pain is an independent risk factor for persistent pain after surgery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) provided excellent perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing breast surgery. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant of local anesthetics prolongs the duration of peripheral nerve block and decreases the requirements of postoperative analgesia. The investigators hypothesize that, for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy, ESPB (with a combination of 0.5% ropivacaine 35 ml and dexmedetomidine 1 microgram/kg) can reduce the occurrence of CPSP. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the impact of ESPB with adjuvant dexmedetomidine on the incidence of CPSP in breast cancer patients after mastectomy. We will also observe the impact of ESPB on long-term survival in these patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
ExpectedJuly 31, 2025
July 1, 2025
2.4 years
August 8, 2022
July 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) at 6 months after surgery
CPSP is defined as pain persisting for at least three months after surgery that was not present before surgery or that had different characteristics, and other possible causes of pain were excluded (e.g., cancer recurrence, infection).
At 6 months after surgery
Progression-free survival (long-term outcomes)
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (recurrence or metastasis) or death from any cause.
Up to 3 years after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) at 3 and 12 months after surgery
At 3 and 12 months after surgery
Incidence of neuropathic pain at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
At 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Overall survival (long-term outcome)
Up to 3 years after surgery
Event-free survival (long-term outcome)
Up to 3 years after surgery
Quality of life (long-term outcome)
At 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery
Other Outcomes (7)
Pain intensity within the first 3 postoperative days
At 1 hour, 6 hours, 1 day, 2 days, and 3 days after surgery.
Subjective sleep quality within the first 3 postoperative days
At 1 hour, 6 hours, 1 day, 2 days, and 3 days after surgery.
Patient-reported quality of recovery
At day 1 after surgery
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Erector spinae plane block group
EXPERIMENTALPrior to general anesthesia, ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB; performed with 0.5% ropivacaine 35 ml with dexmedetomidine 1microgram/kg) is performed at T2 level (15 ml) and T4 level (20 ml).
Control group
SHAM COMPARATORGeneral anesthesia alone.
Interventions
Prior to general anesthesia, ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB; performed with 0.5% ropivacaine 35 ml with dexmedetomidine 1 microgram/kg) is performed at T2 level (15 ml) and T4 level (20 ml).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of 18 years or over, but less than 85 years;
- Scheduled to undergo mastectomy for primary unilateral breast cancer.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous breast cancer surgery with an incision of \>2 cm;
- Chronic opioid dependence or long-term intake of analgesic medicines (\>3 months);
- Any contraindication to erector spinae plane block, including intrathoracic infection, infection at the puncture site, cancer invasion of the puncture site, severe spinal deformity, history of spinal surgery, and severe coagulopathy;
- Inability to communicate in the preoperative period because of profound dementia, deafness, language barriers, or end-stage disease;
- History of malignant tumor in other organs, or a current combination of malignant tumor of other organs;
- History of coronary heart disease (diagnosed coronary stenosis, previous myocardial infarction, previous percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting); preoperative hepatic or renal impairment (alanine transaminase and/or aspartate transaminase ≥2 times of upper limit of normal, or serum creatinine\>133 µmol/L); history of peptic ulcer or hemorrhage; ASA classification IV or above;
- Allergy to ropivacaine.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034, China
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142, China
Related Publications (16)
Schug SA, Lavand'homme P, Barke A, Korwisi B, Rief W, Treede RD; IASP Taskforce for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain. Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):45-52. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001413.
PMID: 30586070BACKGROUNDWang L, Cohen JC, Devasenapathy N, Hong BY, Kheyson S, Lu D, Oparin Y, Kennedy SA, Romerosa B, Arora N, Kwon HY, Jackson K, Prasad M, Jayasekera D, Li A, Guarna G, Natalwalla S, Couban RJ, Reid S, Khan JS, McGillion M, Busse JW. Prevalence and intensity of persistent post-surgical pain following breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;125(3):346-357. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.088. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
PMID: 32611524BACKGROUNDSaporito A, Aguirre J, Borgeat A, Perren A, Anselmi L, Poggi R, Minotti B, Cafarotti S, La Regina D, Ceruti S. Persistent postdischarge pain and chronic postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery under general anesthesia and single-shot paravertebral block: incidence, characteristics and impact on quality of life and healthcare costs. J Pain Res. 2019 Apr 16;12:1193-1199. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S195702. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31114301BACKGROUNDKojic K, Clarke H. Important considerations with respect to reducing the transition from acute to persistent postoperative pain. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 May;22(7):779-782. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1892073. Epub 2021 Feb 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 33634743BACKGROUNDRabbitts JA, Palermo TM, Lang EA. A Conceptual Model of Biopsychosocial Mechanisms of Transition from Acute to Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Children and Adolescents. J Pain Res. 2020 Nov 24;13:3071-3080. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S239320. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33262642BACKGROUNDLavand'homme P. The progression from acute to chronic pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):545-50. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834a4f74.
PMID: 21772141BACKGROUNDChin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;68(3):387-408. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
PMID: 33403545BACKGROUNDSaadawi M, Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Leurcharusmee P, Tran Q. Erector spinae plane block: A narrative review with systematic analysis of the evidence pertaining to clinical indications and alternative truncal blocks. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110063. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110063. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
PMID: 33032124BACKGROUNDZhang Y, Liu T, Zhou Y, Yu Y, Chen G. Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 20;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01277-x.
PMID: 33610172BACKGROUNDLi Y, Wang B, Zhang LL, He SF, Hu XW, Wong GT, Zhang Y. Dexmedetomidine Combined with General Anesthesia Provides Similar Intraoperative Stress Response Reduction When Compared with a Combined General and Epidural Anesthetic Technique. Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):1202-10. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001165.
PMID: 26991622BACKGROUNDDesai N, Kirkham KR, Albrecht E. Local anaesthetic adjuncts for peripheral regional anaesthesia: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76 Suppl 1:100-109. doi: 10.1111/anae.15245.
PMID: 33426668BACKGROUNDVorobeichik L, Brull R, Abdallah FW. Evidence basis for using perineural dexmedetomidine to enhance the quality of brachial plexus nerve blocks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Feb;118(2):167-181. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew411.
PMID: 28100520BACKGROUNDPerez-Gonzalez O, Cuellar-Guzman LF, Soliz J, Cata JP. Impact of Regional Anesthesia on Recurrence, Metastasis, and Immune Response in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):751-756. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000662.
PMID: 28953508BACKGROUNDRamirez MF, Cata JP. Anesthesia Techniques and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes. Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 8;11:788918. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.788918. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34956903BACKGROUNDDockrell L, Buggy DJ. The role of regional anaesthesia in the emerging subspecialty of onco-anaesthesia: a state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76 Suppl 1:148-159. doi: 10.1111/anae.15243.
PMID: 33426658BACKGROUNDZhang J, Chang CL, Lu CY, Chen HM, Wu SY. Paravertebral block in regional anesthesia with propofol sedation reduces locoregional recurrence in patients with breast cancer receiving breast conservative surgery compared with volatile inhalational without propofol in general anesthesia. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Oct;142:111991. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111991. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
PMID: 34449311BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dong-Xin Wang, M.D., Ph.D.
Peking University First Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2022
First Posted
August 10, 2022
Study Start
May 23, 2023
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share