Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Target-controlled Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol Versus Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Endovascular Thrombectomy Procedure in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: Comparison of the Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
298
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present clinical trial compares the effect of two general anesthesia (GA) modalities, the one with volatile anesthetic sevoflurane (endotracheal-intubated) and the other integrating total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol (non-intubated), on post-procedural delirium and cognitive dysfunction after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the participants with acute ischemic stroke. To assess the outcome of both modalities, the sedation depth of GA will be regulated with processed electroencephalogram monitor to reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium and the peri-procedural blood pressure will be controlled according to the guideline.Based on that, the investigators try to find a better general anesthetic modality for acute ischemic stroke participants undergoing EVT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 22, 2023
February 1, 2023
3.9 years
May 23, 2022
February 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Cognitive function and delirium evaluation
Cognitive functions (including delirium) will be assessed with the confusion assessment method. It is a validated delirium diagnostic tool, and is considered the "gold standard" for detection of delirium.: The four features of delirium are:1) acute onset and fluctuating course, 2) inattention, 3) disorganized thinking and 4) altered level of consciousness. A positive diagnosis of delirium is made if the person has feature 1 \& 2 plus either 3 or 4. A positive diagnosis of delirium means that the patient's outcome is poor.
Baseline
Change in Cognitive function and delirium evaluation
Cognitive functions (including delirium) will be assessed with the confusion assessment method. It is a validated delirium diagnostic tool, and is considered the "gold standard" for detection of delirium.: The four features of delirium are:1) acute onset and fluctuating course, 2) inattention, 3) disorganized thinking and 4) altered level of consciousness. A positive diagnosis of delirium is made if the person has feature 1 \& 2 plus either 3 or 4. A positive diagnosis of delirium means that the patient's outcome is poor.
Day 1 after procedure
Change in Cognitive function and delirium evaluation
Cognitive functions (including delirium) will be assessed with the confusion assessment method. It is a validated delirium diagnostic tool, and is considered the "gold standard" for detection of delirium.: The four features of delirium are:1) acute onset and fluctuating course, 2) inattention, 3) disorganized thinking and 4) altered level of consciousness. A positive diagnosis of delirium is made if the person has feature 1 \& 2 plus either 3 or 4. A positive diagnosis of delirium means that the patient's outcome is poor.
Day 7 after procedure
Change in Cognitive function and delirium evaluation
Cognitive functions (including delirium) will be assessed with the confusion assessment method. It is a validated delirium diagnostic tool, and is considered the "gold standard" for detection of delirium.: The four features of delirium are:1) acute onset and fluctuating course, 2) inattention, 3) disorganized thinking and 4) altered level of consciousness. A positive diagnosis of delirium is made if the person has feature 1 \& 2 plus either 3 or 4. A positive diagnosis of delirium means that the patient's outcome is poor.
Month 3 after procedure
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Neurological function: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
Baseline
Neurological function: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
Day 1 after procedure
Neurological function: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
Day 7 after procedure
Neurological function: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
Month 3 after procedure
Neurological function: modified Rankin scale
Baseline
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intubated Sevoflurane-GA group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter preoxygenation for 3 minutes with 100% oxygen, anesthesia is induced with intravenous injection of propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg), remifentanil infusion (Ce value around 1-1.5 ng/kg), and cisatracurium (0.15-0.2 mg/kg), and followed by endotracheal intubation. General anesthesia is maintained with cisatracuirum (0.03 mg/kg every 45-50 min), remifentanil (Ce value around 1-1.5 ng/kg) and sevoflurane inhalation. Sevoflurane concentration will be adjusted to keep BIS value within the range of 40-60. Mechanical ventilation will be processed at volume-controlled mode with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 60%, tidal volume 6 ml/kg, and respiratory rate 9-12/min to keep normocapnia and avoid desaturation during the EVT procedure.
Non-intubated TIVA-propofol group
ACTIVE COMPARATORWith the application of Optiflow nasal high flow set at a flow rate of 20 L/min and 60% FiO2, total intravenous anesthesia is induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol (effect site (Ce) concentration around 1.5-2 μg/ml) and remifentanil (Ce value around 1.0-1.5 ng/ml), and adjusted as required.
Interventions
Cognitive functions (including delirium) will be assessed pre-procedure (baseline) and emergency department (before EVT), on day 1 and 7 and 3 months after EVT procedure
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) will be assessed before (baseline but after stroke) and after EVT on days 1 and 7 after procedure up to 3 months follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion who are scheduled to undergo endovascular thrombectomy procedure, and
- Must be age of 20 to 90
- Must fulfill the indications for endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke according to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke and 2019 Taiwan stroke society guideline for endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke, and
- Must agree to enroll into the clinical trial and sign the written informed consent from patients or delegates
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to allergy to the anesthetics used in this clinical study
- Refusal for enrolling in study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hsu Ma, MD, PhD
Institutional Review Board, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients who meet the enrollment criteria and who provide written informed consent will be randomly assigned to either of the intubated Sev-GA or non-intubated TIVA-propofol groups according to either the discretion of anesthesiologist in charge or random allocation. If the patient was in critical situation, uncooperative, or with uncontrolled movement, the anesthesiologist would choose the intubated Sev-GA instead of the scheduled randomization. However, if patient is cooperative and not critical, the patient would be randomly assigned according to the randomization list created with the use of computer-generated, permuted-block sequences. Only the anesthesiologist and physicians involved in EVT are aware of the anesthesia assignment. On the contrary, patients, personnel who collect data, fill out questionnaire and scale measurement, and personnel who assess outcomes are unaware of the group assignments.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2022
First Posted
August 9, 2022
Study Start
February 15, 2022
Primary Completion
December 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share