Sedation and Nursing Management in EEG Recording in Children
Evaluation of the Effect of Chloral Hydrate, Hydroxyzine and Melatonin Used as Sedative Drugs in EEG Recording in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Electroencephalogram (EEG) has an important place in establishing the correct diagnosis, providing appropriate intervention, and predicting the prognosis in the long term in children. When the literature is examined, it is seen that different sedative drugs (benzodiazepines, barbiturates, phenothiazine, chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, melatonin, etc.) and their combinations are used to provide sedation during EEG recordings, but there is no ideal sedative drug. Nurses working in the field of pediatric neurology in EEG recordings; It has important roles in preparing the child and parent for the procedure, applying sedation before the procedure, performing the EEG recording properly, monitoring vital signs during the procedure, monitoring the effects of the sedative substance after the procedure, and sending the patient home safely. Pediatric nurses fulfill these roles by adopting a multidisciplinary team approach. In this context, the aim of our research is; The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine and melatonin, which are used as sedative agents before EEG recording in children, on sleep success, time to fall asleep, side effects and EEG background.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2022
CompletedAugust 9, 2022
August 1, 2022
12 months
July 15, 2022
August 8, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Success in falling asleep
After the sedative drug administration, the child was taken to a quiet and dark sleep room in the polyclinic environment with his parents in order to enable the child to fall asleep. In this process, the child was evaluated by the nurse every 5 minutes with the Ramsay Sedation Score. Children with a Ramsay Sedation Score of 4-6 were taken to the electroencephalogram room for recording.
12 month
Sleep Time
After the sedative drug administration, the child was taken to a quiet and dark sleep room in the polyclinic environment with his parents in order to enable the child to fall asleep. In this process, the child was evaluated by the nurse every 5 minutes with the Ramsay Sedation Score. Children with a Ramsay Sedation Score of 4-6 were taken to the electroencephalogram room for recording.The time elapsed during this period was recorded as the time to fall asleep.
12 month
Ramsay Sedation Score on electroencephalogram background
After the sedative drug administration, the child was taken to a quiet and dark sleep room in the polyclinic environment with his parents in order to enable the child to fall asleep. In this process, the child was evaluated with the Ramsay Sedation Score. Children with a Ramsay Sedation Score of 4-6 were taken to the electroencephalogram room for recording. Electroencephalogram electrodes were placed in accordance with the international 10-20 electrode positioning system. An average of 30 minutes of electroencephalogram recording was made for each patient. Post-extraction records were evaluated by a pediatric neurologist and recorded in the data collection form.
12 month
Study Arms (3)
Chloral Hydrate
EXPERIMENTALChloral hydrate was administered orally to children at a dose of 25-50 mg/kg/dose. After the sedative drug administration, the child was taken to a quiet and dark sleep room in the polyclinic environment with his parents in order to enable the child to fall asleep. In this process, the child was evaluated by the nurse every 5 minutes with the Ramsay Sedation Score. Children with a Ramsay Sedation Score of 4-6 were taken to the EEG room for recording. During the sedation, the child's blood pressure, oxygen saturation and pulse were checked every 5 minutes. EEG electrodes were placed in accordance with the international 10-20 electrode positioning system. An average of 30 minutes of EEG recording was made for each patient. The awakening process of children whose EEG recordings were completed was evaluated with the Steward Recovery Score. Individuals with a score of 6 were accepted as awake, and the child's procedure was completed.
Hydroxyzine
EXPERIMENTALHydroxyzine was administered orally to children at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg/dose. After the sedative drug administration, the child was taken to a quiet and dark sleep room in the polyclinic environment with his parents in order to enable the child to fall asleep. In this process, the child was evaluated by the nurse every 5 minutes with the Ramsay Sedation Score. Children with a Ramsay Sedation Score of 4-6 were taken to the EEG room for recording. During the sedation, the child's blood pressure, oxygen saturation and pulse were checked every 5 minutes. EEG electrodes were placed in accordance with the international 10-20 electrode positioning system. An average of 30 minutes of EEG recording was made for each patient. The awakening process of children whose EEG recordings were completed was evaluated with the Steward Recovery Score. Individuals with a score of 6 were accepted as awake, and the child's procedure was completed.
Melatonin
EXPERIMENTALMelatonin was administered orally 3 mg up to 15 kilograms, and 6 mg after 15 kilograms.After the sedative drug administration, the child was taken to a quiet and dark sleep room in the polyclinic environment with his parents in order to enable the child to fall asleep. In this process, the child was evaluated by the nurse every 5 minutes with the Ramsay Sedation Score. Children with a Ramsay Sedation Score of 4-6 were taken to the EEG room for recording. During the sedation, the child's blood pressure, oxygen saturation and pulse were checked every 5 minutes. EEG electrodes were placed in accordance with the international 10-20 electrode positioning system. An average of 30 minutes of EEG recording was made for each patient. The awakening process of children whose EEG recordings were completed was evaluated with the Steward Recovery Score. Individuals with a score of 6 were accepted as awake, and the child's procedure was completed.
Interventions
Evaluation of the effect of sedative agents applied during EEG recording in children
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- According to the classification determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) (Dripps, 1963; Daabis, 2011), in the risk group of ASA I (normal healthy individual), ASA II (with mild systemic disease), the procedure preparation given by the EEG nurse is in accordance with the educational steps. The children who came to the shooting were included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe systemic disease (neurological, cardiac, respiratory, metabolic and gastrointestinal system), known hypersensitivity to the sedative agent, vomiting after sedative drug administration, waking up during the shooting, failing to fall asleep, and the procedure preparation training steps given by the EEG nurse Children who were not prepared properly were not included in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Suleyman Demirel University
Isparta, 32000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Şerife Tutar
Suleyman Demirel University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2022
First Posted
August 9, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
August 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Will be shared after the research is published