NCT05492032

Brief Summary

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a pervasive and lifelong developmental disorder that currently affects 1 in 54 children. Individuals with autism are often severely impaired in communication, social skills, and cognitive functions. Particularly detrimental characteristics typical of ASD include the inability to relate to people and the display of repetitive stereotyped behaviors and uncontrollable temper outbursts over trivial changes in the environment, which often cause emotional stress for the children, their families, schools and neighborhood communities. To date, there is no cure for ASD, and the disorder remains a highly disabling condition. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive neuromodulation technique, has shown great promise as an effective and cost-effective tool for reducing core symptoms, such as anxiety, aggression, impulsivity, and poor social communication, in patients with autism. Although the empirical findings in patients with ASD are encouraging, it remains to be determined whether these experimental data can be translated into real-world benefits. An important next step is to better understand the factors affecting the long-term efficacy of tDCS treatment - in particular, the possible risk factors associated with relapse in patients with ASD and the role of booster session tDCS as an add-on treatment to induce long-lasting neuroplastic effects in ASD.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Jun 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress86%
Jun 2022Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 2, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 8, 2022

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

November 26, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

AutismASDtDCSTreatment outcomeEEGE/I ratioBooster effectsCognitive function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in social responsiveness - Social Responsiveness Scale-2nd edition (SRS-2)

    SRS-2 is a sensitive measure of social functioning in children that detects even subtle symptoms that are highly related to ASD. It uses a four-point scale and focuses on different aspects of socialization. The total score reflects the clinical effectiveness of tDCS, and higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. It has been shown that SRS-2 is sensitive to detect changes in social communication improvement related to improved cognitive functioning after treatment. SRS-2 assessments will be conducted before and immediately after tDCS treatment.

    First day of intervention, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months after treatment (5 time points)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • tDCS safety and clinical response in tDCS outcome

    First day of intervention, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months after treatment (5 time points)

  • Change in neuropsychological measures - CANTAB® cognitive tests

    First day of intervention, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months after treatment (5 time points)

  • Change in EEG E/I ratio measurement

    First day of intervention, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months after treatment (5 time points)

Study Arms (3)

Active cathodal (inhibitory) tDCS vs. Sham-tDCS condition

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: sham multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether active cathodal \[inhibitory\] tDCS over the left dlPRC will facilitate learning through stimulation and thus improve cognitive function in patients with ASD, the primary outcomes (SRS-2 scores) of the two groups at the start (T0), 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2), 6-month (T3), and at the end of study i.e. 12-months (T4) will be compared.

Device: Active-tDCSDevice: Sham-tDCSBehavioral: Cognitive training

Active booster tDCS treatment vs. Sham booster tDCS treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: active multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether booster treatment cycles of tDCS will prolong the cognitive benefits in individuals with ASD), the primary outcome, the total SRS-2 score, and the secondary outcomes, the E/I ratio and the cognitive composite score at the start (T0), 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2), 6-month (T3), and at the end of study i.e. 12-months (T4), will be compared.

Device: Active-tDCSDevice: Sham-tDCSBehavioral: Cognitive training

Change in EEG E/I ratios in the active tDCS vs. sham tDCS groups

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: sham multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether enhanced neuronal network organization, as indicated by EEG E/I ratios, in patients with ASD will mediate the beneficial effects of tDCS in terms of improvements in cognitive function, measurements taken at baseline, 1-day and 1-month after tDCS treatment will be compared. The change in EEG E/I ratios in patients in the active tDCS and sham tDCS groups will be compared using E/I ratios averaged from channels Fp1, F3, and F7 to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the EEG data and to represent the left frontal E/I ratio.

Device: Active-tDCSDevice: Sham-tDCSBehavioral: Cognitive training

Interventions

For active-tDCS condition, participants will receive stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with ramp up and ramp down mode for 10 seconds, eliciting a tingling sensation on the scalp that fades over seconds. Following that, a twenty-minute executive functional training task will be initiated five minutes subsequent to the stimulation mode, and the stimulation will be terminated when the training task ends.

Active booster tDCS treatment vs. Sham booster tDCS treatmentActive cathodal (inhibitory) tDCS vs. Sham-tDCS conditionChange in EEG E/I ratios in the active tDCS vs. sham tDCS groups
Sham-tDCSDEVICE

For sham-tDCS condition, participants will receive initial stimulation with ramp up and ramp down mode for 30 seconds, eliciting a tingling sensation on the scalp then it will be discontinued. Participants will also receive the twenty-minute executive functional training task five minutes subsequent to the stimulation mode.

Active booster tDCS treatment vs. Sham booster tDCS treatmentActive cathodal (inhibitory) tDCS vs. Sham-tDCS conditionChange in EEG E/I ratios in the active tDCS vs. sham tDCS groups

Participants will complete an online cognitive training program consisting of 10 consecutive daily weekday training sessions while they receive either the active or sham tDCS stimulation. Each training session will last for 20 minutes. The online cognitive training program will comprise five exercises assessing information processing speed and executive function capacities. Each exercise will take approximately 4 minutes to complete. Given many studies, across different neurological/neuropsychiatric diagnoses, especially for people with autism, it has long been established that social skills and functioning are closely related, and multiple studies have shown that executive function training can improve social functioning in autism or vice versa (i.e. social skills training improves executive functioning in autism), it is reasonable to include cognitive training in this tDCS protocol.

Active booster tDCS treatment vs. Sham booster tDCS treatmentActive cathodal (inhibitory) tDCS vs. Sham-tDCS conditionChange in EEG E/I ratios in the active tDCS vs. sham tDCS groups

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 21 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals who are confirmed by a clinical psychologist based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Ed (DSM-V) criteria of Autism spectrum disorder and structured interview with their parents or primary caregivers on their developmental history using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R).
  • Individuals with ASD who are comorbid with ADHD symptoms will be included if they were willing to abstain from the use of these medications at least 96 hours before the commencement, until the completion, of the treatment.
  • In view of the fact that neuroadaptation to antipsychotics typically occurs within six months, potential participants who are prescribed antipsychotic medications will only be included if the dosage of the medication remained unchanged for six months or more before the experimental period.

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals without a confirmed diagnosis from the clinical psychologist, with a history of other neurological and psychiatric disorders and head trauma, or on psychiatric medication will be excluded from the study.
  • In view of the possibility of seizure induction by tDCS, potential ASD participants comorbid with epilepsy will be excluded.
  • Potential participants comorbid with mood or anxiety disorders will also be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic Disorder

Interventions

Cognitive Training

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Child Development Disorders, PervasiveNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurological RehabilitationRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Yvonne Han, PhD

    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a one-year parallel design (triple-arm), double-blind RCT. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either (1) active daily tDCS with computerized executive function training in weeks 0-2, followed by active bimonthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 3-14, and active monthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 15-52; (2) active daily tDCS with computerized executive function training in weeks 0-2, followed by sham bimonthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 3-14, and sham monthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 15-52, or sham daily tDCS with computerized executive function training in weeks 0-2, followed by sham bimonthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 3-14, and sham monthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 15-52.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2022

First Posted

August 8, 2022

Study Start

June 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

November 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Locations