NCT05491707

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of listening to music, to a control group (no music), on peri-operative anxiety using the validated VAS-A, in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty procedures under spinal anaesthesia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
58

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable anxiety

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable anxiety

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 4, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 8, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 18, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

August 1, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 15, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

MusicPerioperative anxietySpinal anaesthesiaLower limb arthroplasty

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Describe the pre-operative anxiety scores measured by the visual analogue scale for anxiety

    Describe the pre-operative anxiety scores measured by the visual analogue scale for anxiety in both the intervention and the control group. The minimum score on this scale is zero and the maximum score is ten. Zero indicates that the patients have no anxiety and ten indicates that the patient is extremely anxious.

    Pre-operative visit (T1)

  • Describe and compare the change in anxiety scores, on the visual analogue scale for anxiety, at the pre-operative visit (T1) and at skin incision (T3) in the control group.

    Describe and compare the change anxiety scores, visual analogue scale for anxiety, at the pre-operative visit (T1) and at skin incision (T3) in the control group. The minimum score on this scale is zero and the maximum score is ten. Zero indicates that the patients have no anxiety and ten indicates that the patient is extremely anxious.

    Pre-operatively and skin incision

  • Describe and compare the change in anxiety scores, on the visual analogue scale for anxiety, at the pre-operative visit (T1) and at skin incision (T3) in the music group.

    Describe and compare the change in anxiety scores, on the visual analogue scale for anxiety, at the pre-operative visit (T1) and at skin incision (T3) in the music group. The minimum score on this scale is zero and the maximum score is ten. Zero indicates that the patients have no anxiety and ten indicates that the patient is extremely anxious.

    Pre-operatively and skin incision.

  • Describe and compare the change in anxiety scores, on the visual analogue scale for anxiety, at each time point (T1-T4) between the control group and the music group.

    Describe and compare the change in anxiety scores, on the visual analogue scale for anxiety, at each time point (T1-T4) between the control group and the music group. The minimum score on this scale is zero and the maximum score is ten. Zero indicates that the patients have no anxiety and ten indicates that the patient is extremely anxious.

    Pre-operatively, prior to surgery, at skin incision and immediately after surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Describe the difference in the anxiety scores, on the visual analogue scale for anxiety, between male and female patients.

    Pre-operatively, prior to surgery, at skin incision and immediately after surgery.

  • Describe the difference in anxiety scores, on the visual analogue scale for anxiety, between knee and hip arthroplasty.

    Pre-operatively, prior to surgery, at skin incision and immediately after surgery.

  • Describe and compare the total propofol dose between the two groups.

    Immediately after surgery

  • Describe patient satisfaction, assessed by a questionnaire, in the intervention group.

    Immediately after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Music

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in the intervention group will receive music after the ASA monitors are applied. The music will be played at a self-selected volume, on Pro Bass Swagger Series Aux disposable earphones and will be played for the duration of the surgical procedure. The music will be played from an iPhone which will be placed in a plastic bag for infection control purposes. These patients will receive standard anaesthetic care.

Other: Music

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will not receive music. These patients will receive standard anaesthetic care.

Interventions

MusicOTHER

Patients will choose a genre of music from the following list; pop, gospel, classical, jazz, and soul, at the preoperative visit. This will be played on disposable ear phones at a self-selected volume for the duration of the surgical procedure.

Music

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 105 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • all patients, aged 18 years and older,
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I, II or III,
  • patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty surgery under spinal anaesthesia,
  • patients with the mental capacity to consent to the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with significant visual or hearing loss,
  • patients with any contra-indications to spinal anaesthesia,
  • patients with any contra-indications to moderate sedation including moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea (indicated by a "STOPBANG" score of 5-8) (46),
  • patients with pre-existing diagnosed anxiety disorders or other serious mental disturbances,
  • revision arthroplasty (this may require deviation from the standardised anaesthetic technique used for this trial),
  • anxious patients who cannot be reassured and require additional anxiolytic agents.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic hospital

Johannesburg, Gauteng, 1864, South Africa

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Disorders

Interventions

Music Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensory Art TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CarePsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Samantha A Ballard, MBBCH

    University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In this randomised controlled trial, patients will be identified on the arthroplasty lists. Criteria for inclusion will be determined at the pre-operative assessment. After enrolment, participants will be randomised into two groups in a 1:1 ratio, music (intervention group) and no music (control group). Randomisation will be done using a simple randomisation chart.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2022

First Posted

August 8, 2022

Study Start

January 4, 2022

Primary Completion

July 1, 2022

Study Completion

June 15, 2023

Last Updated

June 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification will be shared

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.
Access Criteria
Researches who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Locations