Study Stopped
The study was prematurely terminated due to a long pause in study activities and significant missing participant data.
Function, Pain, and Alignment Following Knee Replacement for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
261
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There are many factors that can influence patient satisfaction and patient related outcomes following total knee replacement including the surgical alignment of the joint components. Historically, total knee replacements have been performed with an aim aiming to achieve neutral alignment or a mechanical weight axis in the lower extremity . However, only 0.1 % of the population have a pre-surgical anatomical neutral alignment, and therefore the constitutional anatomy of the patient is neglected. There is a growing trend to return patients back their anatomical constitutional alignment after a knee replacement, referred to as Kinematic Alignment using robotics. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to examine how mechanical alignment and kinematic alignment impacts function, pain, mood and fatigue following TKR for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Outcomes will be measured at 6 week, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 8, 2024
CompletedMay 20, 2025
May 1, 2025
2.2 years
December 7, 2021
May 15, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Function
Oxford knee score
post-operatively 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Quality of Life following knee surgery
post-operatively at 2 years
Quality of Life following knee surgery
post-operatively at 6 weeks
Quality of Life following knee surgery
post-operatively at 6 months
Quality of Life following knee surgery
post-operatively at 1 year
Pain intensity and effectiveness of analgesics
Post-operatively at 6 weeks
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Health Care Utilization
Post-operatively at 6 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Manual Adjusted Mechanical Alignment
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care: * Midline incision, no tourniquet, medial Parapatellar arthrotomy, resect anterior osteophytes * Distal femoral cut with 3-5 degrees of valgus from the anatomical axis (Based on the angle measurement on the 4 foot standing Xray). Correct for flexion contracture. * Measure the femoral size with the anterior referencing guides. Use 3 degrees external rotation to the Posterior condylar axis * Perform anterior, posterior and chamfer cuts with the 4 in 1 in appropriate external rotation * Extramedullary tibial alignment guide with 3-5 degrees posterior slope, and orthogonal cut to the tibial axis. * Resect posterior osteophytes * Place trial components and perform appropriate release/balance the gaps * Patellar replacement based on surgeon's discretion * Cementing the components with tourniquet inflation
Robotic Assisted Adjusted Mechanical Alignment
EXPERIMENTAL* Midline incision, no tourniquet, medial Parapatellar arthrotomy, resect anterior osteophytes * Place the femoral pins in the proximal incision and the tibial pins 4 finger breadths under the joint line * Map the knee and perform evaluation * Assess gaps, adjust the femoral axis to decrease soft tissue release (+/- 2 degrees), correct for flexion contracture * Verify and perform distal femoral cut, proximal tibial cut orthogonal (90 Degrees) to the tibial axis * Assess and balance extension gap with appropriate releases * Remap the posterior condylar axis, assess the flexion space, 3 degrees external rotation to the posterior condylar axis * Perform anterior, posterior and chamber cuts with the 4 in 1 (appropriate external rotation), followed by posterior osteophyte resection * Place trial components and balance the knee, soft tissue releases (1-2 mm) * Patellar replacement based on surgeon's discretion * Cementing the components with tourniquet inflation
Robotic Assisted Kinematic Alignment: (Joint line restoration)
EXPERIMENTAL\-- Midline incision, no tourniquet, medial parapatellar arthrotomy, resect anterior osteophytes * Place femoral pins in proximal incision, tibial pins 4 finger breadths under joint line * Map and evaluate the knee, ROM, varus valgus testing at 0 \& 90 degrees flexion * Distal femoral cut based on cartilage loss on medial and lateral femoral condyle (9mm total cut/condyle). * Perform distal femoral cut, maintain the joint line (femoral axis +/- 5 degrees) * Perform proximal tibial cut within +/- 3 degrees, balance the gaps, differential between medial and lateral gaps = 1- 3mm. * Assess extension space, resect posterior osteophytes * Remap posterior condylar axis, place 4 in 1 at 0 degrees to the post condylar axis (aim = 9mm posterior condylar cuts) * Resect posterior osteophytes, place trial components. Adjust cuts to achieve a balanced knee, maintain HKA axis +/- 3 degrees * Patellar replacement per surgeon discretion * Cement the components with tourniquet inflation
Interventions
Surgical technique for Total knee replacement will be standardized with a MicroPort prosthetic knee joint, patella replacement is optional based on the surgeon's assessment. The participants will receive local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon, and a similar anesthetic technique with spinal anesthesia using epidural morphine and single shot peripheral nerve blocks. They will receive weight based antibiotics and tranexamic acid. Participants will be randomized to one of three groups. 1)Manual adjusted mechanical knee alignment (usual care) involves the surgeon manually. 2) Robot assisted surgery will include using the ROSA© device from Zimmer©. Robot assisted mechanical alignment aims for neutral alignment of the knee joint. 3) Robot assisted restricted kinematic alignment aims to place the knee joint closer to the participant's anatomical positioning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- undergoing unilateral TKR for the treatment of osteoarthritis
- between the age of 18 and 85 years of age
- able to read, speak and understand English, have a telephone
- are able to provide consent
You may not qualify if:
- enrolled in another study, are
- undergoing revision surgery or bilateral surgery, and are
- over the age of 85 years. Patients will also be excluded if they
- have a cognitive impairment (as indicated in the medical record) affecting their ability to comprehend the questions being asked
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
North York General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frank Mastrogiacomo, PhD
North York General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Trials Manager
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2021
First Posted
August 5, 2022
Study Start
November 16, 2021
Primary Completion
February 8, 2024
Study Completion
February 8, 2024
Last Updated
May 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Knowledge translation will occur utilizing a variety of mechanisms. The results of this study will be disseminated at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association conference. They will also be published in an high impact journal. At the provincial level, the data from this study will be shared with Health Quality Ontario, as a requirement of the bundled care program. At the local level, the investigators will disseminate the results of this study as aggregate data at North York General Hospital with to the health care practitioners and administrators involved with caring for the arthroplasty patient population.