Comparison of Preoperative Analgesics on the Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see how preoperative oral diclofenac sodium, piroxicam, and tramadol affects inferior alveolar nerve block efficacy during root canal treatment of mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The proposed hypothesis is that the tested drug groups will improve the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block in comparison to the control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2022
CompletedAugust 5, 2022
August 1, 2022
8 months
August 2, 2022
August 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To check the efficacy of preoperative analgesics on inferior alveolar nerve block using Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale.
Study's outcome is to evaluate the efficacy of different preoperative oral analgesics on inferior alveolar nerve block during root canal procedure of mandibular teeth using Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale on symptomatic irreversible pulpitis patients Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale is a visual assessment tool to record patients pain intensity. This scale is categorized as: no pain (0mm), moderate pain (55-114mm), and severe pain (\>114mm) * Patients will register their Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale recording to the investigator before drug ingestion * Patients will re-register their Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale 1 hour after the drug ingestion, during root canal procedure after inferior alveolar nerve block * The difference in the preoperative and intraoperative Heft-Parker Visual Analogue Scale score will determine the efficacy of different analgesic interventional groups
1 hour
Study Arms (4)
Vitamin E
PLACEBO COMPARATORDiclofenac sodium
EXPERIMENTALPiroxicam
EXPERIMENTALTramadol
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients between the ages of 18 - 65 years.
- Patients with no medical or systemic conditions.
- Patients with prolonged pain response on cold pulp testing of 1st and 2nd mandibular molars.
- Patient with 1st and 2nd mandibular molars having symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with no periapical pathology or tenderness on percussion.
- Preoperative moderate to severe pain on heft parker visual analogue scale.
- Patients who can understand the recording of the pain using heft parker visual analogue scale.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
- Patients with reported allergy to diclofenac sodium, piroxicam, and tramadol.
- Patients with periodontal pathologies, necrotized pulp, ankylosed or resorbed roots, open apex and non-restorable tooth.
- Patients who have taken an analgesic in the past 24 hours.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Farjad Zafarlead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Operative Dentistry, Baqai Dental College, Baqai Medical University.
Karachi, Sindh, 75340, Pakistan
Related Publications (1)
Prasanna N, Subbarao CV, Gutmann JL. The efficacy of pre-operative oral medication of lornoxicam and diclofenac potassium on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2011 Apr;44(4):330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01833.x.
PMID: 21692235RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Farjad Zafar, BDS, MSc
Assistant Professor and Head of Department of Dental Implantology.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maryam Riaz, BDS
Lecturer in Department of Oral Biology.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zara Khalid, BDS
House officer.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tipu Sultan, BDS, MDS
Assistant Professor in Department of Periodontology.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Aisha Wali, BDS, MPH
Assistant Professor and Head of Department of Research and Development.
- STUDY CHAIR
Talha M Siddiqui, BDS, MCPS
Professor and Chairman of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- The study was designed to be a double blinded study, where the operators and the patients both were unaware of the groups of drugs that were used; this anonymity was achieved by marking the groups A, B, C and D on boxes for drugs containing a placebo, diclofenac sodium, piroxicam, and tramadol respectively.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor and Head of Department of Dental Implantology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2022
First Posted
August 5, 2022
Study Start
June 21, 2021
Primary Completion
February 18, 2022
Study Completion
February 18, 2022
Last Updated
August 5, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- The data will be made available by November 2022 and will be available for 5 years till October 2027.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who have received an ethical approval from their institution/organization will be provided with the collected IPD. The data will be sent through an email.
All collected IPD will be shared with the researchers who have received an ethical approval from their institution/organization through an email.