Comparison of Pain Relief Between High Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block and Cervical Epidural Injection
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary endpoint of this study was to identify whether there is a pain improving effect of high thoracic eretor spinae plane block (ESPB) when compared with cervical epidural injection
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2023
CompletedApril 5, 2023
April 1, 2023
9 months
August 1, 2022
April 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes of numerical rating scale
Changes of 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10)
baseline, 10 min after injection, 1wk after injection, 2 wks after injection, 4 wks after injection, 8 wks after injection
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Changes of neck disability index
baseline, 8 wks after injection
Study Arms (2)
high thoracic ESPB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup where ESPB is performed at T2 with local anesthetic mixture 20 ml
cervical epidural group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup where cervical epidural injection is performed at C6-7 or C7-T1 level
Interventions
fascial plane injection guided by ultrasound guidance
cervical epidural injection by fluoroscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- cervical spinal stenosis
- cervical intervertebral disc herniation
- cervical facet arthropathy
- cervical foraminal stenosis
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to local anesthetics or contrast medium
- Pregnancy
- Spine deformity
- Patients with coagulation abnormality
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hong ji HEE
Daegu, 42601, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ji H Hong, Ph.D
Keimyung University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2022
First Posted
August 4, 2022
Study Start
August 7, 2022
Primary Completion
April 30, 2023
Study Completion
April 30, 2023
Last Updated
April 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04