Spyglass-guided Lithotripsy Versus ESWL for Pancreatic Duct Stones
Spyglass-guided Lithotripsy Vs ESWL for Pancreatic Duct Stones
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Overall stone clearance with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for pancreatic duct stones is a amjor problem, especially bigger size stones. After ERCP failure, surgery was the only option but patients not suitable for surgery were treated through stenting. But had to undergo multiple ERCPs and show lower success rate. Recently, SpyGlass and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) have been applied for the treatment of huge stones. The present study aims to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of SpyGlass-guided lithotripsy and ESWL procedures for the removal of pancreatic duct stones.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2023
CompletedAugust 15, 2023
August 1, 2023
2.9 years
July 25, 2022
August 13, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Technical success
Successfull intervention
Intraoperative
Clinical success
Pancreatic duct stone clearance rate
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Adverse events
1 month
Total number of ERCP
1 month
Procedure sessions
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Spyglass group
ACTIVE COMPARATORlithotripsy through Spyglass and ERCP
ESWL group
EXPERIMENTALLithotripsy through ESWL and ERCP
Interventions
Spyglass-guided lithotripsy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pancreatic duct sone
- Falied to eliminate through ERCP only
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Refusal of written informed consent
- Patients not suitable for ESWL/ Spyglass
- Contraindications to ERCP exist
- Complicated with acute pancreatitis or acute cholangitis
- Coagulation dysfunction#thrombocytopenia
- Patients after gastrointestinal reconstruction
- Allergic to drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hangzhou First People's Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, China
Related Publications (5)
Guzman-Calderon E, Martinez-Moreno B, Casellas JA, Aparicio JR. Per-oral pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy for the endoscopic management of pancreatolithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis. 2021 Oct;22(10):572-581. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13041.
PMID: 34436824BACKGROUNDBick BL, Patel F, Easler JJ, Tong Y, Watkins JL, McHenry L, Lehman G, Fogel EL, Gromski MA, Sherman S. A comparative study between single-operator pancreatoscopy with intraductal lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the management of large main pancreatic duct stones. Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3217-3226. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08631-7. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
PMID: 34264399BACKGROUNDTandan M, Reddy DN. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic and large common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct 21;17(39):4365-71. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i39.4365.
PMID: 22110261RESULTvan Huijgevoort NCM, Veld JV, Fockens P, Besselink MG, Boermeester MA, Arvanitakis M, van Hooft JE. Success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ERCP in symptomatic pancreatic duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Aug;8(8):E1070-E1085. doi: 10.1055/a-1171-1322. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
PMID: 32743061RESULTBeyna T, Neuhaus H, Gerges C. Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones under direct vision: Revolution or resignation? Systematic review. Dig Endosc. 2018 Jan;30(1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/den.12909. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
PMID: 28656688RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jianfeng Yang, MD
Affilated Hangzhou First People Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2022
First Posted
July 27, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
November 30, 2023
Study Completion
November 30, 2023
Last Updated
August 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share