ESWL on Disintegration of Renal Stones
Impact of Different Shock Wave Release Frequencies on Disintegration of Renal Stones in Assuit Urology & Nephrology University Hospital
1 other identifier
observational
90
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The impact of different frequencies on pattern of disintegration of renal stones
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2019
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedMay 6, 2019
May 1, 2019
1.1 years
May 3, 2019
May 3, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
stone free rate
complete disintegration of renal stones or having clinically insignificant gravel smaller than 2 mm
2 weeks
Study Arms (3)
first group
patient who exposed to frequency 60 shock wave per min
second group
patient who exposed to frequency 80 shock wave per min
third group
patient who exposed to frequency 100 shock wave per min
Interventions
The impact of different frequencies on pattern of disintegration of renal stones
Eligibility Criteria
Patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic from age 18 years to 70 years old with renal stone who candidate for ESWL
You may qualify if:
- Pelvic and upper ureteric stones
- Stone size less than 2 cm
- Stone density up to 1000 HU
You may not qualify if:
- Lower calycle stone
- Stone size 2 cm or more
- Stone denstiy more than 1000
- age group less than 18 y
- uncontrolled hypertension patient and bleeding disorder
- Pregnancy
- Patients with UPJ obstruction, ureteral strictures,
- Congenital anomalies
- Previous stented ureter
- Narrow neck of the calycx less than 30 %
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Shinde S, Al Balushi Y, Hossny M, Jose S, Al Busaidy S. Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment. Oman Med J. 2018 May;33(3):209-217. doi: 10.5001/omj.2018.39.
PMID: 29896328BACKGROUNDMcClinton S, Cameron S, Starr K, Thomas R, MacLennan G, McDonald A, Lam T, N'Dow J, Kilonzo M, Pickard R, Anson K, Keeley F, Burgess N, Clark CT, MacLennan S, Norrie J; TISU Study Group. TISU: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, as first treatment option, compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment, for ureteric stones: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018 May 22;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2652-1.
PMID: 29788982BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Weeks
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.B.B.CH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2019
First Posted
May 6, 2019
Study Start
May 5, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05