Testing P2Y12 Platelet Inhibitors Generics Beyond Bioequivalence
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a pilot study that was conducted to prove the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor generically named Ticaloguard® compared to its brand Brilique® in healthy volunteers. we advocate comparing the clinical efficacy rather than simple bioequivalence comparison.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 cardiovascular-diseases
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 cardiovascular-diseases
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 13, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2022
CompletedJuly 26, 2022
July 1, 2022
15 days
July 19, 2022
July 21, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
testing degree of platelet inhibition of Ticalouguard versus the brand Brilique
Testing the degree of platelet inhibition in both groups through performing platelet aggregation testing using Adenosine diphosphate as agonist
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Brilique group
EXPERIMENTALvolunteers in the Brilique group received a loading dose of 180 mg brand Brilique® (AstraZeneca , Sweden) then 90 mg twice daily regimen for 4 days
Ticaloguard group
EXPERIMENTALvolunteers in the Ticaloguard group received the Egyptian made generic ticalogaurd in a loading dose of 180 mg then 90 mg twice daily regimen for 4 day
Interventions
compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor generically named Ticaloguard® compared to its brand Brilique® in healthy volunteers
compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor generically named Ticaloguard® compared to its brand Brilique® in healthy volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- volunteers of both sexes, aged between 18-64 years old
You may not qualify if:
- volunteers with any abnormalities in the complete blood count (CBC) at entry time
- those with any medical conditions contraindicated with antiplatelet therapy
- those taking aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or any over the counter medications (OTC) that contain medication such as, antihistamines, antibiotics in the previous month
- volunteers with history of blood disorders or bleeding diathesis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, 4262004, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nirmeen sabry, MD
Faculty of pharmacy, Cairo university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The volunteers were randomly allocated to 2 groups, one receiving the brand drug and the other receiving the generic, each receiving a code indicating his/her group and the key of the codes could only be revealed by the principal investigator.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2022
First Posted
July 26, 2022
Study Start
November 13, 2021
Primary Completion
November 28, 2021
Study Completion
November 28, 2021
Last Updated
July 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share