Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Remedies on Migraine: a Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo Controlled Study.
HOMEOMIG
Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Remedies With High Grade of Pathological Similarity vs Conventional Standardized Pharmacological Treatment in Patients With Migraine.
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Migraine, a chronic and often lifelong neurological disorder, is the second leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. To reduce this global burden, concerted efforts are needed to implement and improve migraine health-care policies. Several observational studies showed significant improvement of different headaches types with homeopathy. The purpose of this study is the assessment of the efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Remedies (specific remedies for each patient) versus Conventional pharmacological treatment in patients with migraine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2023
CompletedJuly 21, 2022
July 1, 2022
4.3 years
July 10, 2022
July 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of migraine attacks
Assess the efficacy of chosen individualized homeopathic remedy in the preventive treatment of migraine, measuring the change in the number of weekly migraine attacks comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo.
Baseline - Month 3
Number of migraine days
Assess the efficacy of chosen individualized homeopathic remedy in the preventive treatment of migraine, measuring the change in the number of monthly migraine days comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo.
Baseline - Month 3
Responder in frequency of migraine attacks
Number of subjects achieving diminution in more than 50% of migraine attacks per month comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo
Baseline - Month 3
Responder in quantity of migraine days
Number of subjects achieving diminution in more than 50% of migraine days per month comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo
Baseline - Month 3
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Migraine acute medication usage doses
Baseline - Month 3
Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Baseline - Month 3
Study Arms (2)
Individualized Homeopathic Remedy plus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment
EXPERIMENTALEach subject receives an individually selected homeopathic remedy (individualized homeopathic remedy) as an add on to the conventional standardized pharmacological treatment he/she is receiving prior and during study. Standardized pharmacological treatment will be monitored and approved at first hospital neurological visit and as a requirement needs to be unchanged within 3 months prior inclusion and throughout the study.
Placebo plus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects receive an indistinguishable placebo plus the conventional standardized pharmacological treatment he/she is receiving prior and during study. Standardized pharmacological treatment will be monitored and approved at first hospital neurological visit and as a requirement needs to be unchanged within 3 months prior inclusion and throughout the study.
Interventions
An individualized homeopathic remedy selected for each subject according clinical homeopathic parameters will be administered daily in the form of oral globules as an add on to conventional treatment.
Placebo plus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with certified diagnosis of migraine with or with out aura of at least one year of evolution according to the Subcommittee of Headaches Classification of the International Headache Association 3rd edition (ICHD-III)
- Patients do not have chronic migraine defined as Headache occurring on 15 or more days per month for more than 3 months, which has the features of migraine headache on at least 8 days per month (ICHD-III)
- Patients meeting ICHD-III criteria of probable medication overuse headache (MOH)
- Female patients in reproductive age that are correctly using a standardized contraceptive method
- Participants who are able to maintain a prospectively collected simple headache diary
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under standardized pharmacological treatment who have significantly (\>50%) added or modified migraine preventive drugs doses within 3 months prior to study baseline
- Patients who have initiated or significantly (\>50%) modified doses of any drug for any chronic treatment with any agent with proven analgesic action or psychiatric action (antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, etc) or neurological action (anticonvulsivants, antiparkinsonians, etc) within 3 months prior to study baseline
- Patients suffering any cause of secondary headache like trauma, metabolic or vascular disorders, non vascular intracranial lesions, abuse of alcohol or other psychoactive substances.
- Pregnant or probably pregnant patients according to date of last menstruation referred by the patient of more than 35 days in women with regular cycles or plasma beta sub-unit of human chorionic gonadotrophin in women with irregular menstrual cycles
- Patients with history of anaphylaxis, non controlled diabetes, severe disorders being neurological, cardiac, pulmonary and/or hepatic as well as psychosis or suicide ideation and/or attempts.
- Patients with other acute or chronic pain disorders, history of hemiplegic migraine or migraine with brain stem aura, history of cerebral-vascular accident, convulsions, severe coronary disease, non controlled hypertension or cognitive dysfunctions.
- Patients not meeting homeopathic clinical criteria of High Pathological Similitude defined as an homeopathic previous success probability for the selected homeopathic remedy of of 5 to 7 points in a probability scale of 1 to 7
- NOTE: Please contact the investigator for additional information about Homeopathic criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Bernardino Rivadavia
Buenos Aires, 1425, Argentina
Related Publications (18)
Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Ashina M, Becker WJ, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Pozo-Rosich P, Wang SJ; International Headache Society Clinical Trials Standing Committee. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 2018 Apr;38(5):815-832. doi: 10.1177/0333102418758283. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
PMID: 29504482BACKGROUNDHeadache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.
PMID: 23771276BACKGROUNDEisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):246-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280406.
PMID: 8418405BACKGROUNDSteinsbekk A, Ludtke R. Patients' assessments of the effectiveness of homeopathic care in Norway: a prospective observational multicentre outcome study. Homeopathy. 2005 Jan;94(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.11.016.
PMID: 15751329BACKGROUNDMathie RT, Lloyd SM, Legg LA, Clausen J, Moss S, Davidson JR, Ford I. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 6;3:142. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-142.
PMID: 25480654BACKGROUNDMathie RT. Controlled clinical studies of homeopathy. Homeopathy. 2015 Oct;104(4):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2015.05.003.
PMID: 26678738BACKGROUNDKristoffersen ES, Aaseth K, Grande RB, Lundqvist C, Russell MB. Self-reported efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine: the Akershus study of chronic headache. J Headache Pain. 2013 Apr 18;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-36.
PMID: 23596996BACKGROUNDDanno K, Colas A, Masson JL, Bordet MF. Homeopathic treatment of migraine in children: results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Feb;19(2):119-23. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0821. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
PMID: 22978244BACKGROUNDOwen JM, Green BN. Homeopathic treatment of headaches: a systematic review of the literature. J Chiropr Med. 2004 Spring;3(2):45-52. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60085-8.
PMID: 19674623BACKGROUNDMathie RT, Roniger H, Van Wassenhoven M, Frye J, Jacobs J, Oberbaum M, Bordet MF, Nayak C, Chaufferin G, Ives JA, Dantas F, Fisher P. Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Apr 17;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-49.
PMID: 22510227BACKGROUNDBell IR, Lewis DA 2nd, Brooks AJ, Schwartz GE, Lewis SE, Walsh BT, Baldwin CM. Improved clinical status in fibromyalgia patients treated with individualized homeopathic remedies versus placebo. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 May;43(5):577-82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh111. Epub 2004 Jan 20.
PMID: 14734789BACKGROUNDAghadiuno M. A study of the inter-observer reliability of paper case analysis. Homeopathy. 2002 Jan;91(1):10-7. doi: 10.1054/homp.2001.0016.
PMID: 12371444BACKGROUNDBrien S, Prescott P, Owen D, Lewith G. How do homeopaths make decisions? An exploratory study of inter-rater reliability and intuition in the decision making process. Homeopathy. 2004 Jul;93(3):125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.04.001.
PMID: 15287431BACKGROUNDSouter K. Heuristics and bias in homeopathy. Homeopathy. 2006 Oct;95(4):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2006.07.008.
PMID: 17015195BACKGROUNDVos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basanez MG, Baxter A, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bernabe E, Bhalla K, Bhandari B, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Black JA, Blencowe H, Blore JD, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Bonaventure A, Boufous S, Bourne R, Boussinesq M, Braithwaite T, Brayne C, Bridgett L, Brooker S, Brooks P, Brugha TS, Bryan-Hancock C, Bucello C, Buchbinder R, Buckle G, Budke CM, Burch M, Burney P, Burstein R, Calabria B, Campbell B, Canter CE, Carabin H, Carapetis J, Carmona L, Cella C, Charlson F, Chen H, Cheng AT, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahiya M, Dahodwala N, Damsere-Derry J, Danaei G, Davis A, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Dellavalle R, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Derrett S, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dherani M, Diaz-Torne C, Dolk H, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Edmond K, Elbaz A, Ali SE, Erskine H, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ewoigbokhan SE, Farzadfar F, Feigin V, Felson DT, Ferrari A, Ferri CP, Fevre EM, Finucane MM, Flaxman S, Flood L, Foreman K, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Franklin R, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabbe BJ, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Ganatra HA, Garcia B, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gmel G, Gosselin R, Grainger R, Groeger J, Guillemin F, Gunnell D, Gupta R, Haagsma J, Hagan H, Halasa YA, Hall W, Haring D, Haro JM, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Higashi H, Hill C, Hoen B, Hoffman H, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Huang JJ, Ibeanusi SE, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jarvis D, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Jonas JB, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Kawakami N, Keren A, Khoo JP, King CH, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Lalloo R, Laslett LL, Lathlean T, Leasher JL, Lee YY, Leigh J, Lim SS, Limb E, Lin JK, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Liu W, Loane M, Ohno SL, Lyons R, Ma J, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Malekzadeh R, Mallinger L, Manivannan S, Marcenes W, March L, Margolis DJ, Marks GB, Marks R, Matsumori A, Matzopoulos R, Mayosi BM, McAnulty JH, McDermott MM, McGill N, McGrath J, Medina-Mora ME, Meltzer M, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Meyer AC, Miglioli V, Miller M, Miller TR, Mitchell PB, Mocumbi AO, Moffitt TE, Mokdad AA, Monasta L, Montico M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Moran A, Morawska L, Mori R, Murdoch ME, Mwaniki MK, Naidoo K, Nair MN, Naldi L, Narayan KM, Nelson PK, Nelson RG, Nevitt MC, Newton CR, Nolte S, Norman P, Norman R, O'Donnell M, O'Hanlon S, Olives C, Omer SB, Ortblad K, Osborne R, Ozgediz D, Page A, Pahari B, Pandian JD, Rivero AP, Patten SB, Pearce N, Padilla RP, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Pesudovs K, Phillips D, Phillips MR, Pierce K, Pion S, Polanczyk GV, Polinder S, Pope CA 3rd, Popova S, Porrini E, Pourmalek F, Prince M, Pullan RL, Ramaiah KD, Ranganathan D, Razavi H, Regan M, Rehm JT, Rein DB, Remuzzi G, Richardson K, Rivara FP, Roberts T, Robinson C, De Leon FR, Ronfani L, Room R, Rosenfeld LC, Rushton L, Sacco RL, Saha S, Sampson U, Sanchez-Riera L, Sanman E, Schwebel DC, Scott JG, Segui-Gomez M, Shahraz S, Shepard DS, Shin H, Shivakoti R, Singh D, Singh GM, Singh JA, Singleton J, Sleet DA, Sliwa K, Smith E, Smith JL, Stapelberg NJ, Steer A, Steiner T, Stolk WA, Stovner LJ, Sudfeld C, Syed S, Tamburlini G, Tavakkoli M, Taylor HR, Taylor JA, Taylor WJ, Thomas B, Thomson WM, Thurston GD, Tleyjeh IM, Tonelli M, Towbin JA, Truelsen T, Tsilimbaris MK, Ubeda C, Undurraga EA, van der Werf MJ, van Os J, Vavilala MS, Venketasubramanian N, Wang M, Wang W, Watt K, Weatherall DJ, Weinstock MA, Weintraub R, Weisskopf MG, Weissman MM, White RA, Whiteford H, Wiersma ST, Wilkinson JD, Williams HC, Williams SR, Witt E, Wolfe F, Woolf AD, Wulf S, Yeh PH, Zaidi AK, Zheng ZJ, Zonies D, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2163-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2.
PMID: 23245607BACKGROUNDHepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Jan;20(1):22-33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22.
PMID: 24372457BACKGROUNDStub T, Musial F, Kristoffersen AA, Alraek T, Liu J. Adverse effects of homeopathy, what do we know? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2016 Jun;26:146-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
PMID: 27261996BACKGROUNDAshina M, Katsarava Z, Do TP, Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Ozge A, Krymchantowski AV, Lebedeva ER, Ravishankar K, Yu S, Sacco S, Ashina S, Younis S, Steiner TJ, Lipton RB. Migraine: epidemiology and systems of care. Lancet. 2021 Apr 17;397(10283):1485-1495. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32160-7. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
PMID: 33773613BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Samuel M Arrues, MD
Researcher
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Remedy vials will be filled according randomized allocation in 2 number sets; one for the experimental group and two for the control group. Randomization information will be kept by the Study pharmaceutical responsible who will be the only person in possession of the sequence from the beginning of the study. Only the pharmaceutical responsible will have access to the randomization codes during the study and only in case of clinical emergency can break the code of an individual patient. The pharmaceutical responsible will never have any direct nor indirect contact with the study subjects. The The study statistician/s will be masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD Family Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2022
First Posted
July 21, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
November 1, 2023
Last Updated
July 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available 6 months after study termination, for a 12 months period.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be shared via e-mail.
After study conclusion individual participant data will be shared, specifically 1- clinical and neurological evolution previous to entering the study; 2- previous treatments; 3- bio psycho social and homeopathic relevant data pre and post treatment period to help understand homeopathic remedy action.