Light-induced Effects on Dental Implant Stability

NCT05467488 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 32/ERC/CMH/LMC
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 66
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Until now, limited research has observed the stability of photo functionalized sandblasted acid-etched (SLA) titanium implants. The study includes a sample size of sixty otherwise healthy patients with implant replacement, comparing nonirradiated, irradiated UVA and UVC titanium implants. It was an interventional study with a sample size divided into three groups using simple randomization. Patients with nonirradiated dental implants make the control group A with UVA and UVC dental implants forming groups B and C, respectively. Before functional loading, implant stability was measured on days zero and eight weeks. SPSS 26.0 is used for data analysis. The data for implant stability quotient (ISQ) levels and osseointegration speed index (OSI) were presented as mean ± SD for each group. The effect of UVA and UVC on ISQ2 compared with the baseline ISQ was done by applying multiple simple regression analysis models, whereas the distinction between UVA and UVC was made through a t-test. p ≤ 0.05 was kept statistically significant. The implants irradiated with UVA significantly affected ISQ levels compared to other groups.

Conditions

Missing Teeth

Keywords

dental implants

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• ISQ measurement through Ostelltm Mentor device

  The Ostelltm device was initially calibrated using a test peg called the ISQ. A smart peg was used for assessment. The smart peg tightened with 5 Ncm torque is then mounted on implant fixture and the transducer connected perpendicular to the implant . The measuring probe is brought closer to the smart peg without touching it. A beeping sound displays the reading on the monitor. Two successive readings are taken mesiodistally along the jaw and buccolingually perpendicular to the jaw .The RFA measurements taken twice during implant treatment are recorded. All the ISQ values were recorded from one to hundred and a mean was taken.

  eight months

Study Arms (3)

Non irradiated implants (group A)

NO INTERVENTION

UVA irradiated group (group B)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure: photofunctionalization

UVC irradiated group (group C)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure: photofunctionalization

Interventions

photofunctionalization PROCEDURE

UVA and UVC photofunctionalization of dental implants

UVA irradiated group (group B); UVC irradiated group (group C)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 21 Years - 60 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• systemically healthy patients with age \> 20 with at least one tooth or more missing

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Prof. Abdul Mueed Zaigham: lead

Study Sites (1)

Institute of Dentistry; CMH Lahore Medical College

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anodontia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth Abnormalities; Stomatognathic System Abnormalities; Stomatognathic Diseases; Tooth Diseases; Congenital Abnormalities; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 13, 2022
• First Posted: July 20, 2022
• Study Start: June 15, 2017
• Primary Completion: March 15, 2018
• Study Completion: June 15, 2018
• Last Updated: September 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Locations

PA (1)