Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of mental disorder that disrupts the person's ability of moving, maintaining their balance and posture. Cerebral palsy is a motor disorganization in Childhood. Cerebral palsy can occur before birth, during birth, within a month after birth, or during 1st year of life when brain is under development. Symptoms vary from person to person in case of severe CP child must needs the equipment used to enhance their mobility and to train muscles. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is method of relieving pain by using mild electric current. Purpose of this study will be to determine effects of TENS on spasticity and gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. TENS is a small machine operated with battery containing attached sticky pads known as electrodes placed on stiffed and painful area of muscles. Classified by Ashworth Scale and Modified Tardieu Scale. Subjects will be randomly divided into four groups 1) Group A= TENS on spastic muscle/agonist, 2) Group B= TENS on antagonist, 3) GroupC= TENS on both agonist and antagonist muscle, Group D= conventional physiotherapy total treatment period is about 3 to 6 weeks. This study will help to discuss how much extent TENS will effect spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Data will be analyzed through SPSS 22
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2022
CompletedJuly 18, 2022
July 1, 2022
7 months
June 20, 2022
July 14, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale
The modified Ashworth scale(MAS) is a 6-point rating scale that is used to measure muscle tone. 0 No increase in tone 1 slight increase in tone giving a catch when slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by the limb was moved in flexion or extension. 1+ slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout (ROM ) 2 more marked increase in tone but more marked increased in muscle tone through most limb easily flexed 3 considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult 4 limb rigid in flexion or extension
Baseline and 4th week
Change in Modified Tardieu Scale
The Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) is an often-recommended spasticity assessment.The MTS classifies the response of a relaxed muscle to a fast, passive stretch (V3). The assessment protocol involves a clinician moving the joint "as fast as possible" through its full range of motion (ROM) without specifying or measuring the speed of completion. The MTS is applied according to this standardized protocol regardless of the functional status or goals of the patient.
Baseline and 4th week
Study Arms (4)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALparticipants in this group will be given with TENS to spastic Hams, Adductor and TA along with stretchings and ROM as baseline treatment
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORparticipants in this group will be given with TENS to opposite of spastic muscles, i.e. quards, abductor and dorsiflexors along with stretchings and ROM as baseline treatment
Group C
ACTIVE COMPARATORparticipants in this group will be given with TENS to both spastic muscles and opposite of spastic muscle along with stretchings and ROM as baseline treatment
Group D
ACTIVE COMPARATORparticipants in this group will be given with stretchings and ROM as baseline treatment
Interventions
All children received 30 min of conventional TENS (continuous stimulation with all parameters constant) with a frequency of 100 Hz and a pulse width of 200 µs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 6-12
- Both Male and Female
- Spastic Cerebral Palsy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with History of uncontrolled seizures
- Patients undergoing previous tendon lengthening surgery
- History of Botox Injection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
DHQ Hospital
Vehari, Punjab Province, 61100, Pakistan
Related Publications (5)
Alhusaini AA, Fallatah S, Melam GR, Buragadda S. Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with therapeutic exercise on hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Somatosens Mot Res. 2019 Mar;36(1):49-55. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2019.1584555. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
PMID: 30913943BACKGROUNDSolopova IA, Sukhotina IA, Zhvansky DS, Ikoeva GA, Vissarionov SV, Baindurashvili AG, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Moshonkina TR. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on motor functions in children with cerebral palsy. Neurosci Lett. 2017 Feb 3;639:192-198. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
PMID: 28063935BACKGROUNDBakaniene I, Urbonaviciene G, Janaviciute K, Prasauskiene A. Effects of the Inerventions method on gross motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018 Sep-Oct;52(5):581-586. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
PMID: 30061001BACKGROUNDAlabdulwahab SS. Electrical stimulation improves gait in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(1):37-43. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0675.
PMID: 21876294BACKGROUNDAlabdulwahab SS, Al-Gabbani M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of hip adductors improves gait parameters of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;26(2):115-22. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2010-0542.
PMID: 20203376BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fareeha Kausar, PP-DPT
Riphah International University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2022
First Posted
July 18, 2022
Study Start
January 13, 2022
Primary Completion
July 30, 2022
Study Completion
August 15, 2022
Last Updated
July 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share