Diathermy vs Scalpel in Abdominal Incision in Women Undergoing CS
Diathermy Versus Scalpel in the Transverse Abdominal Incision in Primigravida Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cesarean section is surging worldwide. For an extended period of surgical practice, the scalpel has been well-known as a gold-standard tool for making surgical incisions. The diathermy, electrocautery, is a substitute.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2023
CompletedJuly 18, 2022
July 1, 2022
6 months
July 14, 2022
July 14, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
blood loss
assess and compare intraoperative blood loss between both studied groups. This was done using visualization technique detecting numbers of fully soaked pads used during the incision.
30 min
Study Arms (2)
diathermy group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients' incisions are completed using the unipolar diathermy from Whiteline until we reach the parietal peritoneum (cutting the Whiteline then coagulating until reaching the peritoneum). The used diathermy frequency was 50-70 MHz.
scalpel
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients had their incisions completed using the surgical scalpel till we reach the parietal peritoneum.
Interventions
incisions completed using use the unipolar diathermy from Whiteline till we reach the parietal peritoneum (cutting the Whiteline then coagulation till reaching the peritoneum). The used diathermy frequency was 50-70 MHz.
patients had their incisions completed using the surgical scalpel till we reach the parietal peritoneum.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with BMI 30- 40 Kg/m2.
- Women pregnant with singletons and planned to have a repeat elective lower-segment CS at 38-39 weeks' gestation due to having had one previous CS.
- Women pregnant with singletons and planned to deliver by lower-segment CS at 38-39 weeks' gestation for the first time (primi-section) due to obstetric indication.
You may not qualify if:
- Cases with coagulopathies eg. Hemophilia, von Willebrand disease
- Cases on anti-coagulant therapy eg. Heparin, warfarin
- Cases with chronic diseases expected to affect wound healing, such as diabetes, hypertension, liver diseases, chronic anemia, and renal impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
faculty of medicine - Cairo university
Cairo, Kasr El Ainy, 11562, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammed A Taymour, MD
Cairo University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2022
First Posted
July 18, 2022
Study Start
July 15, 2022
Primary Completion
January 15, 2023
Study Completion
February 15, 2023
Last Updated
July 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share