Efficacy of Diathermy on Healing Power of Cesarean Section Scar
EDHPCS
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the effects of electro-surgery on healing power as a primary outcome (from skin to the peritoneum. And volume of blood loss, incision time and postoperative surgical wound pain as secondary outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2019
CompletedJanuary 22, 2020
January 1, 2020
6 months
June 11, 2019
January 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cosmosis
The primary objective is to compare healing power between two methods then will be followed at 3, 7, 11, and 15 days post-operative using: Visual Analogue Scale The original VAS consisted of a 100-mm line with "worst scar" at the right end of the line and "best scar" at the left end of the line. In this study, VAS ranged from 0 to 10cm. Using the line as a continuous entity, the patient mark on the line where they thought the scar fit.
15 days after CS
Healing power
The wound score addresses 6 clinical variables: absence of stepoff, contour ir- regularities, wound margin separation \>2 mm, edge inversion, excessive distortion, and overall cosmetic appearance. Each of these categories is graded on a O-or-l-point scale. A total cosmetic score is derived by the addition of the scores of the 6 categorical variables. A score of 6 is considered optimal, while a score of ≤5 suboptimal.
15 days after cs
Secondary Outcomes (1)
postoperative surgical wound pain: VAS scale
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
diathermy group
EXPERIMENTALDiathermy incisions will be carried out using monopolar blade pen electrode, set on cutting mode and delivering a 35 continuous current. Electrosurgical cutting was performed without pressure or mechanical displacement. 'Bleeders' will be controlled by using diathermy, on coagulating mode, and will be applied to a hemostat on the vessels
scalpel group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIncisions made by the scalpel will be done by the traditional method, with proper hemostasis by application of pressure to skin blood vessels and by ligating the subcutaneous bleeders.
Interventions
In women undergoing C.S, is healing power after diathermy equally to healing power after scalpel?
Incisions made by the scalpel will be done by the traditional method, with proper hemostasis by application of pressure to skin blood vessels and by ligating the subcutaneous bleeders.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primi-section
- BMI (18-29) kg/m\^2.
- Age from (18-40).
- Women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision.
You may not qualify if:
- Women with one of the following conditions:
- Patients requiring midline incision or on anti-coagulant therapy
- Cardiac patients on pacemakers and patients with chronic diseases expected to affect wound healing, such as diabetes, liver diseases, chronic anemia and renal impairment
- Obese patients BMI (\>30) kg/m\^2.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain shams maternity teaching hospital
Cairo, Abbasia, 11591, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed abd elfatah elsenity, lecturer
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- allocation done by a person not involved in the study.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of obstetrics and gynecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2019
First Posted
June 18, 2019
Study Start
February 6, 2019
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion
August 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
will be shared in amaster sheet