BEACON: A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of BEAM-101 in Patients With Severe Sickle Cell Disease
BEACON
A Phase 1/2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Dose of Autologous CD34+ Base Edited Hematopoietic Stem Cells (BEAM-101) in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Severe Vaso-Occlusive Crises (Beacon Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
19
Brief Summary
This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, Phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the administration of autologous base edited CD34+ HSPCs (BEAM-101) in patients with severe SCD
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Aug 2022
Longer than P75 for phase_1
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 30, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2028
December 16, 2025
December 1, 2025
5.4 years
June 23, 2022
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in annualized number of severe VOCs (Vascular-occlusive Crisis) relative to baseline
6 months to time of analysis as compared to baseline
Proportion of patients with successful neutrophil engraftment
BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Time to neutrophil engraftment
BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Time to platelet engraftment
BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Transplant-related mortality within 100 days after beam-101 treatment
BEAM-101 administration to day 100
Safety and tolerability assessments based on frequency, severity and seriousness of adverse events (AE's)
BEAM-101 administration through month 24
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Proportion of patients experiencing at least 75% reduction in annualized rate of severe VOCs
Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Proportion of patients experiencing no severe VOCs
6 months to time of analysis as compared to baseline
Change in annualized number of hospitalizations for VOCs
Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in annualized duration of hospitalizations for VOCs
Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in RBC transfusions per month and per year for SCD-related indications
Month 2 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
BEAM-101
EXPERIMENTALBEAM-101 manufactured with autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells collected by plerixafor mobilization and edited ex vivo. No maximum dose has been set for BEAM-101; all of the gene edited cells that pass release specifications will be administered to the patient. BEAM 101 will be administered as a single dose by IV infusion.
Interventions
Single dose of BEAM-101 administered by IV following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥12 years to ≤35 years
- Documented diagnosis of sickle cell disease with βS/βS, βS/β0, or βS/β+ genotypes.
- Severe SCD defined by the occurrence of at least 4 severe VOCs in the 24 months prior to screening despite receiving hydroxyurea or other supportive care measures
You may not qualify if:
- HbF levels \>20%, obtained at the time of screening on or off hydroxyurea therapy
- Previous receipt of an autologous or allogeneic HSCT or solid organ transplantation
- Available and willing matched sibling donor
- Definitive diagnosis of moyamoya syndrome based on screening brain MRA
- History of overt stroke
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136-1005, United States
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center - Egleston Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Henry Ford Cancer Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
St Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105, United States
The Children's Hospital at TriStar Centennial
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (3)
Ligon JA, Cupit-Link MC, Yu C, Levine J, Foley T, Rotz S, Sharma A, Gomez-Lobo V, Shah NN. Pediatric Cancer Immunotherapy and Potential for Impact on Fertility: A Need for Evidence-Based Guidance. Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Aug;30(8):737-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
PMID: 38866240DERIVEDSharma A, Young A, Carroll Y, Darji H, Li Y, Mandrell BN, Nelson MN, Owens CL, Irvine M, Caples M, Jerkins LP, Unguru Y, Hankins JS, Johnson LM. Gene therapy in sickle cell disease: Attitudes and informational needs of patients and caregivers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Jun;70(6):e30319. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30319. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
PMID: 36975201DERIVEDPersaud Y, Mandrell BN, Sharma A, Carroll Y, Irvine M, Olufadi Y, Kang G, Hijano DR, Rai P, Hankins JS, Johnson LM. Attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccine among pediatric patients with sickle cell disease and their caregivers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 May;70(5):e30274. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30274. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
PMID: 36860093DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2022
First Posted
July 13, 2022
Study Start
August 30, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Last Updated
December 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share