Clinical and Histological Assessment of Free Gingival Graft or Collagen Matrix for Socket Sealing After Bone Grafting
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study was to compare, clinical and histologically, the use of the suine collagen matrix (Mucograft Seal \[MS\], Geisthlich®) and the free gingival graft (FGG) for the alveolar sealing after inserted bone graft biomaterial. It was included 18 patients with tooth referred to extraction (maxilar incisives, canines, or pre-molars) which were randomly divided in 2 groups, according to the material for alveolus sealing: control (FGG) and test (MS). After the minimally traumatic extraction, all the alveoli were filled with bovine mineral matrix (Bio-Oss®), and the material for alveolar sealing were positioned and stabilized with sutures. The follow-up (clinical and photographic) happened on the immediate post-operatory period, and with 3, 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days. After 120 days, before implant placement, tissues samples were obtained with a 3.5mm punch scalpel for histological analysis. Qualitative information related to the patient's perception considering the treatment were collected.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2022
CompletedJuly 7, 2022
July 1, 2022
2.6 years
June 24, 2022
July 1, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic and clinical analysis
Socket preservation with xenograft biomaterial and another one to seal it (FGG or collagen membrane). Radiographic analysis - PA (periapical x-rays) comparing groups and periods of the follow-up. It was performed descriptive comparative analysis. Clinical evaluation - bleeding on probing (dichotomic analysis), ISQ (torque achieved - Osstell), qualitative analysis (questionnaire with 8 questions), and subjective appraisal of the soft tissue healing (according to the period of evaluation).
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Histological analysis - Gingiva
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Collagen
EXPERIMENTALThis group received a bone graft (xenograft) and had the socket covered with a collagen membrane, in order to protect the bone graft inserted and seal the socket.
Free gingival graft
EXPERIMENTALThis group received a bone graft (xenograft) biomaterial and had the socket covered with a free gingival graft material, in order to protect the bone graft inserted and seal the socket.
Interventions
Tooth extraction and preservation with a biomaterial
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients ASA I
- patients requiring single tooth extraction in the site between #4 to #13
- patients without enough bone volume for immediate implant placement.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with general contraindications for implant surgery
- pregnant or lactating women
- patients with untreated periodontitis
- bruxism or severe clenching
- immunosuppressed
- patients with a previous history of irradiation of the head and neck area
- uncontrolled diabetes
- heavy smoker (\>10 cigarettes/day)
- poor oral hygiene and low motivation
- use of bisphosphonates
- substance abuse such as alcohol or drugs and psychiatric disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UM - POM Dpt
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joly, PhD
Sao Leopoldo Mandic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2022
First Posted
July 7, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2018
Primary Completion
September 18, 2020
Study Completion
November 30, 2021
Last Updated
July 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No.